Methyl acrylate molecular weight

Kragl 13) pioneered the use of membranes to recycle dendritic catalysts. Initially, he used soluble polymeric catalysts in a CFMR for the enantioselective addition of Et2Zn to benzaldehyde. The ligand a,a-diphenyl-(L)-prolinol was coupled to a copolymer prepared from 2-hydroxyethyl methyl acrylate and octadecyl methyl acrylate (molecular weight 96,000 Da). The polymer was retained with a retention factor > 0.998 when a polyaramide ultrafiltration membrane (Hoechst Nadir UF PA20) was used. The enantioselectivity obtained with the polymer-supported catalyst was lower than that obtained with the monomeric ligand (80% ee vs 97% ee), but the activity of the catalyst was similar to that of the monomeric catalyst. This result is in contrast to observations with catalysts in which the ligand was coupled to an insoluble support, which led to a 20% reduction of the catalytic activity. 

M. M. Taylor, E. H. Harris, and S. H. Feairheller, Effect of Chain Transfer Agents on the Viscosity Molecular Weight of Methyl Methacrylate Grafted onto Chromium-III Crosslinked Collogen, Polym. Prepr. 19, 618 (1978). Semi-I IPNs based on leather and acrylics. Molecular weight control of graft. 

The polymeric products can be made to vary widely in physical properties through controlled variation in the ratios of monomers employed in thek preparation, cross-linking, and control of molecular weight. They share common quaHties of high resistance to chemical and environmental attack, excellent clarity, and attractive strength properties (see Acrylic ester polymers). In addition to acryHc acid itself, methyl, ethyl, butyl, isobutyl, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylates are manufactured on a large scale and are available in better than 98—99% purity (4). They usually contain 10—200 ppm of hydroquinone monomethyl ether as polymerization inhibitor. 

The molecular weight of a polymer can be controlled through the use of a chain-transfer agent, as well as by initiator concentration and type, monomer concentration, and solvent type and temperature. Chlorinated aUphatic compounds and thiols are particularly effective chain-transfer agents used for regulating the molecular weight of acryUc polymers (94). Chain-transfer constants (C at 60°C) for some typical agents for poly(methyl acrylate) are as follows (87) ... 

T is the glass-transition temperature at infinite molecular weight and is the number average molecular weight. The value of k for poly(methyl methacrylate) is about 2 x 10 the value for acrylate polymers is approximately the same (9). A detailed discussion on the effect of molecular weight on the properties of a polymer may be found in Reference 17. 

Intrinsic viscosity—molecular weight relationships have been obtained for copolymers in methyl ethyl ketone. The value for a 15 wt % ethyl acrylate (EA) copolymer is [77] = 2.88 x 10 . ... 

Other commercially relevant monomers have also been modeled in this study, including acrylates, styrene, and vinyl chloride.55 Symmetrical a,dienes substituted with the appropriate pendant functional group are polymerized via ADMET and utilized to model ethylene-styrene, ethylene-vinyl chloride, and ethylene-methyl acrylate copolymers. Since these models have perfect microstructure repeat units, they are a useful tool to study the effects of the functionality on the physical properties of these industrially important materials. The polymers produced have molecular weights in the range of 20,000-60,000, well within the range necessary to possess similar properties to commercial high-molecular-weight material. 

Recently, Tong et al. [195] have shown that in methyl methacrylate-b-alkyl acrylate-b-methyl methacrylate (MAM) and SIS-type triblock copolymers, the ultimate tensile strength is inversely proportional to the molecular weight between the chain entanglements in the middle soft block at comparable proportion of the outer block. 

Methyl acrylate Free radical polymerization similar to the above —CHr-CH— ( OOCHs 0 Amorphous, even when stretched. Soft, rubbery if molecular weight is high. Readily soluble... 

Various substituted styrene-alkyl methacrylate block copolymers and all-acrylic block copolymers have been synthesized in a controlled fashion demonstrating predictable molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distributions. Table I depicts various poly (t-butylstyrene)-b-poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PTBS-PTBMA) and poly(methyl methacrylate)-b-poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PMMA-PTBMA) samples. In addition, all-acrylic block copolymers based on poly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate)-b-poly(t-butyl methacrylate) have been recently synthesized and offer many unique possibilities due to the low glass transition temperature of PEHMA. In most cases, a range of 5-25 wt.% of alkyl methacrylate was incorporated into the block copolymer. This composition not only facilitated solubility during subsequent hydrolysis but also limited the maximum level of derived ionic functionality. 

Increasing the molecular weight of a copolymer containing 5% methyl acrylate (MA) from 100,000 to 1,000,000 daltons had little effect on silica stabilization effectiveness (see Table IX). Increasing the methyl acrylate content from 5% to 30% had also little effect on silica fines stabilization effectiveness. Acidizing substantially reduced the effectiveness of this class of copolymer. Results for the injection of 10,000 pore volumes of water indicated that silica fines elution from the test column was substantially reduced on a long-term basis. 

A half-metallocene iron iodide carbonyl complex Fe(Cp)I(CO)2 was found to induce the living radical polymerization of methyl acrylate and f-bulyl acrylate with an iodide initiator (CH3)2C(C02Et)I and Al(Oi- Pr)3 to provide controlled molecular weights and rather low molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn < 1.2) [79]. The living character of the polymerization was further tested with the synthesis of the PMA-fc-PS and PtBuA-fi-PS block copolymers. The procedure efficiently provided the desired block copolymers, albeit with low molecular weights. 

Experimental studies of the adsorption of polyelectrolyte have been reported by several authors Pefferkom, Dejardin, and Varoqui (3) measured the hydrodynamic thickness of an alternating copolymer of maleic acid and ethyl vinyl ether adsorbed on the pore walls in cellulose ester filter as a function of the molecular weight and the concentration of NaCl. Robb et al. (4) studied the adsorption of carboxy methyl cellulose and poly (acrylic acid) onto surfaces of insoluble inorganic salts. However, their studies are limited to the measurements of adsorbance and the fraction of adsorbed segments. 

A prime example of these features can be found in the synthesis of styrene/ (meth)acrylate random copolymers. By controlling the initiator/total monomer ratio, the molecular weight can be accurately controlled for both styrene/methyl methacrylate and styrene/butyl acrylate random copolymers. As can be seen in Figure 2.3 the polydispersity for both systems is essentially 1.10-1.25 over comonomer ratios ranging from 1/9 to 9/1. 

At 24 °C and 15-60 bar ethylene, [Rh(Me)(0H)(H20)Cn] catalyzed the slow polymerization of ethylene [4], Propylene, methyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate did not react. After 90 days under 60 bar CH2=CH2 (the pressure was held constant throughout) the product was low molecular weight polyethylene with Mw =5100 and a polydispersity index of 1.6. This is certainly not a practical catalyst for ethylene polymerization (TOP 1 in a day), nevertheless the formation and further reactions of the various intermediates can be followed conveniently which may provide ideas for further catalyst design. For example, during such investigations it was established, that only the monohydroxo-monoaqua complex was a catalyst for this reaction, both [Rh(Me)3Cn] and [Rh(Me)(H20)2Cn] were found completely ineffective. The lack of catalytic activity of [Rh(Me)3Cn] is understandable since there is no free coordination site for ethylene. Such a coordination site can be provided by water dissociation from [Rh(Me)(OH)(H20)Cn] and [Rh(Me)(H20)2Cn] and the rate of this exchange is probably the lowest step of the overall reaction.The hydroxy ligand facilitates the dissociation of H2O and this leads to a slow catalysis of ethene polymerization. 

---