Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Methods of detection

Another method of detection of overfitting/overtraining is cross-validation. Here, test sets are compiled at run-time, i.e., some predefined number, n, of the compounds is removed, the rest are used to build a model, and the objects that have been removed serve as a test set. Usually, the procedure is repeated several times. The number of iterations, m, is also predefined. The most popular values set for n and m are, respectively, 1 and N, where N is the number of the objects in the primary dataset. This is called one-leave-out cross-validation. [Pg.223]

Multiplying the transmittance by 100 gives the percent transmittance (%T), which varies between 100% (no absorption) and 0% (complete absorption). All methods of detection, whether the human eye or a modern photoelectric transducer, measure the transmittance of electromagnetic radiation. [Pg.384]

In a quantitative flow injection analysis a calibration curve is determined by injecting standard samples containing known concentrations of analyte. The format of the caK-bration curve, such as absorbance versus concentration, is determined by the method of detection. CaKbration curves for standard spectroscopic and electrochemical methods were discussed in Chapters 10 and 11 and are not considered further in this chapter. [Pg.655]

The array system is discussed in Chapter 29. With array detection, resolution of m/z values depends both on the analyzer and the collector. Historically, the method for recording ions dispersed in space was to use a photographic plate, which was placed in the focal plane such that all ions struck the photographic plate simultaneously but at different positions along the plate, depending on m/z value. This method of detection is now rarely used because of the inconvenience of having to develop a photographic plate. [Pg.212]

In considering the molecules in Table 5.2 it should be remembered that the method of detection filters out any molecules with zero dipole moment. There is known to be large quantities of FI2 and, no doubt, there are such molecules as C2, N2, O2, FI—C=C—FI and polyacetylenes to be found in the clouds, but these escape detection by radioffequency, millimetre wave or microwave spectroscopy. [Pg.121]

The special problems for vaUdation presented by chiral separations can be even more burdensome for gc because most methods of detection (eg, flame ionization detection or electron capture detection) in gc destroy the sample. Even when nondestmctive detection (eg, thermal conductivity) is used, individual peak collection is generally more difficult than in Ic or tic. Thus, off-line chiroptical analysis is not usually an option. Eortunately, gc can be readily coupled to a mass spectrometer and is routinely used to vaUdate a chiral separation. [Pg.71]

Analytical and Test Methods. In addition to the modem spectroscopic methods of detection and identification of pyrroles, there are several chemical tests. The classical Runge test with HCl yields pyrrole red, an amorphous polymer mixture. In addition, all pyrroles with a free a- or P-position or with groups, eg, ester, that can be converted to such pyrroles under acid conditions undergo the Ehrlich reaction with p-(dimethylamino)henzaldehyde to give purple products. [Pg.357]

The methods for detection and quantitation of radiolabeled tracers are deterrnined by the type of emission, ie, y-, or x-rays, the tracer affords the energy of the emission and the efficiency of the system by which it is measured. Detection of radioactivity can be achieved in all cases using the Geiger counter. However, in the case of the radionucHdes that emit low energy betas such as H, large amounts of isotopes are required for detection and accurate quantitation of a signal. This is in most cases undesirable and impractical. Thus, more sensitive and reproducible methods of detection and quantitation have been developed. [Pg.439]

Liquid scintillation counting is by far the most common method of detection and quantitation of -emission (12). This technique involves the conversion of the emitted P-radiation into light by a solution of a mixture of fluorescent materials or fluors, called the Hquid scintillation cocktail. The sensitive detection of this light is affected by a pair of matched photomultiplier tubes (see Photodetectors) in the dark chamber. This signal is amplified, measured, and recorded by the Hquid scintillation counter. Efficiencies of detection are typically 25—60% for tritium >90% for and P and... [Pg.439]

A number of techniques have been developed for the trace analysis of siUcones in environmental samples. In these analyses, care must be taken to avoid contamination of the samples because of the ubiquitous presence of siUcones, particularly in a laboratory environment. Depending on the method of detection, interference from inorganic siUcate can also be problematic, hence nonsiUca-based vessels are often used in these deterrninations. SiUcones have been extracted from environmental samples with solvents such as hexane, diethyl ether, methyl isobutylketone, ethyl acetate, and tetrahydrofuran (THF)... [Pg.59]

GB and other G-agents react with perhydryl ions at pH 9—10 to form a perphosphonate ion, CH2P(0)(0C2H2)00 , which has a sufficiendy high redox potential to oxidize iadole or o-dianisidine to produce colored products. This reaction is thus useful as a method of detection, and less than 1 p.g of GB can be detected ia this manner (15). [Pg.399]

A method of detecting herbicides is proposed the photosynthetic herbicides act by binding to Photosystem II (PS II), a multiunit chlorophyll-protein complex which plays a vital role in photosynthesis. The inhibition of PS II causes a reduced photoinduced production of hydrogen peroxide, which can be measured by a chemiluminescence reaction with luminol and the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The sensing device proposed combines the production and detection of hydrogen peroxide in a single flow assay by combining all the individual steps in a compact, portable device that utilises micro-fluidic components. [Pg.332]

The method of detecting dimethylterephthalate (DMTP), dibuthyl-phthalate (DBP) and diocthylphthalate (DOP) in aqueous extract is based on their extraction with an organic solvent (hexane) and subsequent concentration using gas-liquid chromatography and an electron-absorbing detector. The detection limit is 0.05 mg/dirf for DMTP and DBP, and 0,01 mg/dm for DOP. [Pg.389]

The detection and analysis, including quantification, of cyanobacterial toxins are essential for monitoring their occurrence in natural and controlled waters used for agricultural purposes, potable supplies, recreation and aquaculture. Risk assessment of the cyanobacterial toxins for the protection of human and animal health, and fundamental research, are also dependent on efficient methods of detection and analysis. In this article we discuss the methods developed and used to detect and analyse cyanobacterial toxins in bloom and scum material, water and animal/clinical specimens, and the progress being made in the risk assessment of the toxins. [Pg.111]

It is obvious from the provisional risk assessment values for microcystins, and, being of the same order of magnitude of mammalian toxicity, similar values may be calculated for the cyanobacterial neurotoxins, that sensitive detection methods are required to detect these low concentrations of toxins. Of the biological methods of detection discussed earlier, the mouse and invertebrate bioassays are not sensitive enough without concentration of water samples, in that they are only able to detect mg of microcystins per litre. Only the immunoassays (ng-/rg 1 and the protein phosphatase inhibition assays (ng O... [Pg.121]

Mattauch-Herzog geometry, which simultaneously focuses all resolved masses onto one plane, allowing the integrating properties of an ion-sensitive emulsion to be used as the detector. Although electrical detection with an electron multiplier can be applied, the ion-sensitive emulsion-coated glass photographic plate is the most common method of detection and will be described in this article. [Pg.600]

An FMEA is a qualitative, systematic table of equipment, failure modes, and their effects. For each item of equipment, the failure modes and root causes for that failure are identified along with a worst-case estimate of the consequences, the method of detecting the failure and mi "ation ofits effects. Tables 3.3.5-2 and 3.3.5-3 present partial examples ofFMEAs addressing the Cuoling Tower Chlorination System, and the Dock 8 HF Supply System. [Pg.95]

In spite of numerous advances in the field of detection there are not and never have been any genuinely substance-specific chemical detection reactions. This means that, unlike the spectrometric methods, the methods of detection normally employed in chromatography cannot be employed for an unequivocal identification of compounds, they can only provide more or less definite indications for the characterization of the separated substances. Universal reagents are usually employed for a first analysis of the separation of samples of unknowns. This is then followed by the use of group-specific reagents. The more individual the pieces of information that can be provided from various sources for a presumed substance the more certainly is its presence indicated. However, all this evidence remains indicative it is not a confirmation of identity. [Pg.4]

We intend to devote separate volumes to each method of detection in the order discussed above. [Pg.7]

This method of detection is at its most sensitive if the absorption maximum (A a,) of the sample molecule is exactly at the wavelength of the UV light employed for irradiation. The further lies from this the less radiation is absorbed and the lower the sensitivity of detection. If the compound does not absorb at the wavelength of radiation or if it possesses an absorption minimum just there then such components are not detected by this method. Figure 4C illustrates this with the sweeteners saccharin and dulcin as examples. [Pg.10]

Treatment of the solvent-free chromatogram with iodine vapor or by dipping in or spraying with iodine solution (0.5 — 1%) is a rapid and economical universal method of detecting lipophilic substances. Molecular iodine is enriched in the chromatogram zones and colors them brown. [Pg.46]


See other pages where Methods of detection is mentioned: [Pg.2061]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.48]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.388 , Pg.389 ]




SEARCH



Detection methods

© 2024 chempedia.info