Method development Flow chart

In the following case study for this pharmaceutical compound M, the method development scenario and rationale for each iteration in the method development process is highlighted. Also, a method development flow chart for gradient separations is included which can be used as a general strategy for method development (Figure 8-37). References are made in this case study to the flow chart in Figure 8-37. 

Figure 8-37. Method development flow chart for gradient separations.

Figure 12-7. Methods development flow chart based upon compound solubility.

Fig. 8.1. SFE method development flow-chart. After ref. [24]. Reprinted with permission from LC.GC Inti, Vol. 7, Number 7, July 1994. LC.GC Inti, is a copyrighted publication of Advanstar Communications Inc. All rights reserved.

For method development and display of the run status, a flow-chart of the TraceCon preconcentration system is used to visuahze the current system state. During the execution of a method the flow chart displays the current activity of the TraceCon apparatus in the run mode. Run errors can also be easily identified, so that runs can be aborted if parts of the system fail. 

In 1972 a paper on venting by Huff 2J documented concerns that many designers suspected that to truly be safe the vent sizing of many systems should be based on assuming two-phase flashing flow in the vent system. A two-phase flow vent method developed by Huff was compared with Boyle s all-liquid method, and values from the FIA chart in Figure 2. It can be seen that under many conditions, previous methods were not... 

A strategy for the enantioseparation of basic compounds was described by SokolieP and Koller [35] and is displayed in Figure 3.7. All steps from method development till validation are included in the flow chart. Perhaps a disadvantage in this approach is that sequential screening and optimization steps are used (i.e., every factor is optimized individually). The use of the developed scheme was demonstrated for one compound, for which the method was developed, optimized, and validated. The generic applicability of this approach was not considered and is unknown. 

Implications For B ethod Development. The effects of the calibration process on precision suggest the need for an additional step in the development of an analytical method. A suggested flow chart is shown in Figure 9. The analyst should first develop a method of adequate accuracy and precision without using calibration curves. The calibration step is then added, and the precision is rechecked. If precision has been excessively degraded, the analyst can choose among alternative calibration strategies, such as use of more standard measurements and use of the multiple-curve procedure. 

A variety of methods have been developed to review software (e.g., inspections, walkthrough, and audit). Flow charts graphically representing data flow and software module architecture will clearly aid the review, particularly when verifying design requirements. 

In 1995, an elaborated method was developed for accurate structure analysis using X-ray powder diffraction data, that is, the MEM/Rietveld method [1,9]. The method enables us to construct the fine structural model up to charge density level, and is a self-consistent analysis with MEM charge density reconstruction of powder diffraction data. It also includes the Rietveld powder pattern fitting based on the model derived from the MEM charge density. To start the methods, it is necessary to have a primitive (or preliminary) structural model. The Rietveld method using this primitive structural model is called the pre-Rietveld analysis. It is well known that the MEM can provide useful information purely from observed structure factor data beyond a presumed crystal structure model used in the pre-Rietveld analysis. The flow chart of the method is shown in Fig. 2. 

Information concerning the method of manufacture may be presented in the form of a flow chart. Supply a brief description of the methods of isolation (e.g., synthetic process, fermentation, extraction, recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] procedure) and purification (solvent recrystallization, column chromatography, distillation). Include all synthetic pathways that have been adequately characterized during the investigational stages of drug development. 

Figure 3 Flow chart for methods development by MECC.

Figure 15 Flow chart for the new developed methods. In this flow chart x,. is the end-point of integration, x5 is the start-point of integration and NSTEP is the number of steps. The computation of q, z i = 1(1)3 is based on the Runge-Kutta-Nystrom method of Dormand and Prince 8(7) (see Dormand et al., 1987)...

FIGURE 6 Flow chart for the proactive role of purposeful degradation as an integral part of the method development process. 

The first assay platform, developed by Illumina, combines allele-specific ligation with an extension reaction. The method, called the GoldenGate assay, uses the BeadArray technology, a method using fiberoptic substrates with randomly assembled arrays of beads. Detailed information and flow charts of the methodology can be found at the Illumina website (http //www.illumina.com/products/prod snp. ilmn). 

Nyiredy, S. (2002) Planar chromatographic method development using the PRISMA optimization system and flow charts. 

Sinclair and Boxall [7] focused their screening method on identifying transformation products of pesticides that were more toxic than their parent. They concluded that the majority of transformation products are less toxic than their parent compound. Exceptions are products that are more hydrophobic and thus more bio accumulative than their precursor, or those with a more potent mode of action. The latter can be explained as follows (1) by the presence of a toxicophore that is formed during transformation of a propesticide into its active product, (2) the pesticide toxicophore remains intact during transformation but hydrophobicity increases, or (3) a different toxicophore is formed during the transformation. On the basis of these rules they developed a flow chart to select appropriate assessment factors that relate the toxicity of the parent compound to the predicted toxicity of the transformation product. This approach is valuable for preliminary hazard assessment and prioritization of further testing but cannot give a quantitative account of the risk associated with transformation products. 

Figure 19.12 illustrates a flow chart for the development of the cIEF method. At the beginning, it is recommended that the initial conditions described in Section 19.5.1 are tested. The second step should then involve adjusting the sample concentration. The third step is the critical step in the method development because a high-resolution method is based on good reproducibility. All methods should be attempted to ensure a reproducible peak pattern. Then, the separation resolution should be enhanced with the use of narrow pH range CAs. The final step in the method development is pl determination and sample peak identification. 

Method of Purification. Develop a flow chart that summarizes the sequence of operations that will be used to purify the desired product. The chart will show at what stages of the work-up procedure unchanged starting materials and unwanted by-products are removed. By understanding the logic of the purification process, you will know why each of the various operations specified in the purification process is performed. 

Fig. 8.27. Flow chart of a development method for active systems [142,162]...

To better identify the boundaries of the oil-in-water phase and how its characteristics vary with small fluctuations in composition, we extended our analyses of the ternary phase diagram to include more detailed characterization of each phase and a higher resolution map of the oil-water phase. Two lipids— DOPA, an anionic lipid, and lecithin, a zwitterionic neutral lipid—were compared to determine the effect of lipid head group. Five different characterization methods were employed (1) visual classification of the phases, (2) buoyant density, (3) fluorescence quenching, (4) FT-IR, and (5) Cryo-TEM. The rationale for each technique is summarized in Table 15.2. A flow chart for utilizing the information obtained from these methods was developed to objectively evaluate the oil-in-water phase (Fig. 15.5). 

Hence, estimation of the pressure drop in turbulent, horizontal slurry flow in a pipe, based on the method developed by Hedstrom, involves using the friction factor chart given in Figure 4.6 and Equation (4.12). 

During the development method the applied development mode, forced-flow technique, and development distance always depends on the separation distance, as is summarized in Figure 7a and 7b in a flow chart. 

---