Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mechanical test adhesive

Rheometric Scientific markets several devices designed for characterizing viscoelastic fluids. These instmments measure the response of a Hquid to sinusoidal oscillatory motion to determine dynamic viscosity as well as storage and loss moduH. The Rheometric Scientific line includes a fluids spectrometer (RFS-II), a dynamic spectrometer (RDS-7700 series II), and a mechanical spectrometer (RMS-800). The fluids spectrometer is designed for fairly low viscosity materials. The dynamic spectrometer can be used to test soHds, melts, and Hquids at frequencies from 10 to 500 rad/s and as a function of strain ampHtude and temperature. It is a stripped down version of the extremely versatile mechanical spectrometer, which is both a dynamic viscometer and a dynamic mechanical testing device. The RMS-800 can carry out measurements under rotational shear, oscillatory shear, torsional motion, and tension compression, as well as normal stress measurements. Step strain, creep, and creep recovery modes are also available. It is used on a wide range of materials, including adhesives, pastes, mbber, and plastics. [Pg.202]

It is only in the context of the systematic variation of the properties of the adhesive and/or the adherend surface in a set of otherwise identical specimens subjected to a given mechanical testing procedure that it is reasonable to think of predicting relative interfacial strength. [Pg.4]

As is true for macroscopic adhesion and mechanical testing experiments, nanoscale measurements do not a priori sense the intrinsic properties of surfaces or adhesive junctions. Instead, the measurements reflect a combination of interfacial chemistry (surface energy, covalent bonding), mechanics (elastic modulus, Poisson s ratio), and contact geometry (probe shape, radius). Furthermore, the probe/sample interaction may not only consist of elastic deformations, but may also include energy dissipation at the surface and/or in the bulk of the sample (or even within the measurement apparatus). Study of rate-dependent adhesion and mechanical properties is possible with both nanoindentation and... [Pg.193]

Moore, D., Pavan, A., and Williams, J. 2001. Fracture Mechanics Testing Methods for Polymers, Adhesives, and Composites. Elsevier, New York. [Pg.481]

The three principal forces to which adhesive bonds are subjected are a shear force in which one adherend is forced past the other, peeling in which at least one of the adherends is flexible enough to be bent away from the adhesive bond, and cleavage force. The cleavage force is very similar to the peeling force, but the former applies when the adherends are nondeformable and the latter when the adherends are deformable. Appropriate mechanical testing of these forces are used. Fracture mechanics tests are also typically used for structural adhesives. [Pg.33]

Both fiber-matrix interphase-sensitive mechanical tests (interlaminar shear strength, 90° flexure) and interphase-insensitive tests (0° flexure) were conducted on high volume composite samples fabricated from the same materials and in the same manner as discussed above to see if the interphase and its properties altered the composite mechanical properties and in what manner. A summary of the data is plotted as a bar graph in Fig. 7. The first set of bars represents the difference in fiber-matrix adhesion measured between the bare fibers and the sized fibers by the ITS. The composite properties plotted on the figure also show increased values for the epoxy-sized material over the bare fiber composite. [Pg.524]

Various mechanical testing methods have been used to assess the bioadhesive properties of materials and formulations. Review of the literature reveals that the technique most commonly used is the tensile test [82,85]. This test provides the measure of the force needed to detach a layer of the tested material or formulation from a mucosal substrate as a function of the displacement occurring at the bioadhesive interface. Besides maximum force of detachment, another parameter provided by tensile test is the work of adhesion calculated as the area under the force versus displacement curve. Such a parameter gives more complete... [Pg.456]

With time (under increased temperature and humidity) the crack tip continues to a weaker region which for this surface treatment appears to be near the oxide/alloy interface. Figure 11 summarizes the analysis of the bond failure for this particular surface treatment. The important aspect here is that under identical conditions, different surface preparations show different modes of failure. Weak boundary layers are not developed using some treatment/bonding combinations. Processes have been developed in which the locus of failure remains in the adhesive ("a cohesive failure") and it is necessary to use a mechanical test in which even more stress is placed on the interfacial region (19). [Pg.138]

Fundamental mechanisms of adhesion. All classical adhesion tests involve a rheological component, in the deformation of the near-interface material, and a surface chemical component. With the recent availability of microscopic techniques to study surface forces, one can possibly go after the surface chemical component, separately from the rheological component. More generally, the configurational and dynamic behavior of macromolecular interfacial regions remains a very rich area. [Pg.342]

When subject to 90° peel test, adhesion values of 7-10 lbs/in have been obtained under ambient conditions. Interestingly, the adhesion after the solder float test retained 4-6 lbs/in. This high adhesion is believed to be primarily due to the mechanical interlocking facilitated by the textured Kapton polyimide. [Pg.240]

Moore DR, Pavan A, Williams JG, eds.. Fracture Mechanics Testing methods for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites, ESIS Publication 28, 2001, Elsevier. [Pg.292]

Davies, P., B.R.K. Blackman, and A.J. Brunner, Mode II delamination, in Fracture mechanics testing methods for polymers adhesives and composites, D.R. Moore, A. Pavan, and J.G, Williams, Editors. 2001, Elsevier Amsterdam, London, New York. p. 307-334. [Pg.304]

ESIS 28 Fracture Mechanics Testing Methods for Polymers Adhesives and Composites. [Pg.581]


See other pages where Mechanical test adhesive is mentioned: [Pg.106]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.282]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.115 ]




SEARCH



Adhesion mechanics

Adhesion mechanisms

Adhesion test

Adhesion testing

Adhesion tests mechanical pull

Adhesive Tests

Adhesive bond strength tests mechanical

Adhesive testing

Adhesiveness test

Mechanical adhesion

Mechanical adhesion tests

Mechanical adhesion tests

Mechanical and adhesion testing methods of thin films

Mechanical testing

Mechanical tests

Test, testing adhesion

© 2024 chempedia.info