Measured adiabatic calorimeter

In chemical and biological experiments processes are normally exothermic. In case an endothermic process is measured, adiabatic calorimeters can be operated... 

Although it is difficult to identify Tg in water, it is nevertheless interesting, after the TMSC [130], to also measure adiabatic calorimeters. These measurements are usually carried out by intermittently heating or cooling the sample under adiabatic... 

The heat capacity of a gas at constant pressure is nonually detenuined in a flow calorimeter. The temperature rise is detenuined for a known power supplied to a gas flowing at a known rate. For gases at pressures greater than about 5 MPa Magee et al [13] have recently described a twin-bomb adiabatic calorimeter to measure Cy. 

Adiabatic calorimeters are complex home-made instruments, and the measurements are time-consuming. Less accurate but easy to use commercial differential scanning calorimeters (DSCs) [18, 19] are a frequently used alternative. The method involves measurement of the temperature of both a sample and a reference sample and the differential emphasizes the difference between the sample and the reference. The two main types of DSC are heat flux and power-compensated instruments. In a heat flux DSC, as in the older differential thermal analyzers (DTA), the... 

Since the determination of absolute rate constants is one of the most urgent problems in cationic polymerization, and the styrene-perchloric acid system seemed to be so clean and simple, Gandini and Plesch set out first to check Pepper and Reilly s results by determining spectroscopically the concentration of carbonium ions during polymerization, and they intended then to extend the method to other monomers. However, their findings were not as expected. A comparison of spectroscopic and conductivity measurements with rate measurements in an adiabatic calorimeter showed [4] that in methylene dichloride solution ... 

The versatility of the DSC method and the high speed of the experiments have costs in terms of accuracy. For example, the best accuracy in the determination of heat capacities of solids by DSC is typically 1% [3,248-250], at least one order of magnitude worse than the accuracy of the corresponding measurements by adiabatic calorimetry [251]. This accuracy loss may, however, be acceptable for many purposes, because DSC experiments are much faster and require much smaller samples than adiabatic calorimetry experiments. In addition, they can be performed at temperatures significantly above ambient, which are outside the normal operating range of most adiabatic calorimeters. 

The RSST calorimeter (see Annex 2) is a pseudo-adiabatic, low thermal inertia calorimeter, intended for screening purposes. It can identify the system type and measure adiabatic rate of temperature-rise and rate of gas generation by the reacting mixture. It is therefore well-suited to the task of selecting the overall worst case scenario from a small number of candidates. Alternatively, a calorimeter designed to obtain relief system sizing data may be used for this purpose (see Annex 2). 

To overcome these effects, a suitable adiabatic calorimeter, for measuring runaway reaction relief sizing data, will11,21 ... 

A variation, which results in a more simple apparatus, is the drop calorimeter. The test piece is heated (or cooled) externally, dropped into the calorimeter and the resultant change in temperature monitored. For the simplest measurements, the calorimeter need not be surrounded by an adiabatic jacket but in that case, corrections for the heat exchange with the surroundings must be applied. A procedure using a drop calorimeter has been standardized for thermal insulation in ASTM C35l". It is possible to combine the adiabatic and drop calorimeter methods by dropping a heated sample into an adiabatic chamber and this has been used for plastics12. 

Except where the very highest precision is required, when an adiabatic calorimeter would be used, it is usual nowadays to measure specific heat by... 

Since autocatalytic reactions often show only a low initial heat release rate, the temperature rise under adiabatic condition will be difficult to detect. Therefore, the sensitivity of the adiabatic calorimeter must be carefully adjusted. A small deviation in temperature control may lead to large differences in the measured time to maximum rate. This method should only be applied by specialists and is often used to confirm results obtained by other methods. 

A diagram of a constant-volume adiabatic calorimeter, called a bomb calorimeter, used for measuring the A U of combustion reactions is shown in Fig. 3. 

The evaluation of chemical reaction hazards involves establishing exothermic activity and/or gas evolution that could give rise to incidents. However, such evaluation cannot be carried out in isolation or by some simple sequence of testing. The techniques employed and the results obtained need to simulate large-scale plant behavior. Adiabatic calorimeters can be used to measure the temperature time curve of selfheating and the induction time of thermal explosions. The pertinent experimental parameters, which allow the data to be determined under specified conditions, can be used to simulate plant situations. 

In an ideal adiabatic calorimeter, there is no heat exchange between the calorimetric vessel and the surroundings. This implies that the temperature in the calorimetric vessel will increase (exothermic processes) or decrease (endothermic processes) during the measurement. The heat quantity, evolved or absorbed during an experiment, is in the ideal case equal to the product between the temperature change, AT, and the heat capacity of the calorimetric vessel (including its content), C ... 

For adiabatic type calorimeters, the initial and the final temperatures are by definition different. To which temperature will a derived A//-value then refer In connection with microcalorimetric measurements, the problem may merely be academic as the temperature change may be very small. However, it is at this point instructive to analyze in some detail what we do when we calibrate an adiabatic calorimeter. Let the initial and the final state of the experimental process be represented by A and B and the corresponding temperatures by TA and TB, respectively. The experimental process is thus ... 

In a recent.comprehensive investigation, an optical integrating sphere was used to measure the effects of radiation and its component parts, absorptivity, reflectivity, and transmissivity, of a fabric. Emissivity of the textile wrapped around a heated brass cylinder was measured by thermoprobes in an evacuated environment (3.). The specific heat of textiles is usually measured with adiabatic calorimeters other thermal characteristics such as heat of fusion of absorbed water in fibers were also measured by this technique (19). 

For chemical reactions, AU values can be obtained by allowing the reaction to proceed in an adiabatic calorimeter, in which temperature changes during the reaction can be measured and converted to values for Aq. The most common source of work in chemical reactions is changes in volume (U) during the reaction. The work done against a pressure P is given by ... 

Let us now consider step I, the adiabatic step, and the measurement of the temperature difference (Tj Tq), which is the fundamental measurement of calorimetry. If this step could be carried out in an ideal adiabatic calorimeter, the temperature variation would be like that shown in Fig. la. In this case there would be no difficulty in determining the temperature change AT = Tj - Tq, since (dT/dt) = 0 before the time of mixing the reactants and after the products achieve thermal equilibrium. The only cause of temperature change here is the chemical reaction. However, it is an unrealistic idealization to assume that step I is traly adiabatic as no thermal insulation is perfect, some heat will in general leak into or out of the system during the time required for the change in state to occur and for the thermometer to come into equilibrium with the product system. 

Rooney has recently revived work on this monomer in an investigation of its polymerisation by trityl hexafluoroantimonate - He used a spectroscopic stop-flow apparatus to follow initiation and an adiabatic calorimeter to measure rates of polymerisation. Propagation was shown to compete effectively with initiation to the point that some initiator was often present at the end of the polymerisations. These observations cast some doubts on the assumption made in the paper by the Liverpool school discussed above. A kinetic analysis of the initiation reaction showed it to be bimolecular, with a rate constant of about 130 sec at 20°C. The determination of the propagation rate constant was less strai tforward despite the fact that further monomer-addition experiments seemed to rule out any appreciable termination. The kp values fluctuated considerably as the initial catalyst concentration was varied, a fact which induced Rooney to propose that the empirical constant was a composite function of kp and kp. Experiments with a common-anion salt supported this proposal and their kinetic treatment led to the individual values of kp = 6 x 10 sec and kp = 5 x 10 sec. It is difficult to assess the reliability of these values in view of the following statement by the author the reaction at a 5 x 10 M concentration of initiator, thought to proceed exclusively through paired ions. .. . This statement is certainly incorrect as far as the initiator is concerned for which the proportion of ion pairs for a concentration 5 x 10 M at 20°C is only about 20% in methylene chloride However, the experiments... 

Measurements were made from 20° to 300 °K using an adiabatic calorimeter. Before each filling of the container, the zeolite was baked out for at least 1 week while pumping on the system. The amount of sorbate sealed into the platinum-iridium sample container was determined gasometrically, and a small known amount of He also was added to facilitate thermal equilibrium as is normal practice in low-temperature calorimetry. Since the sample container was baked at T > 300 °C, it was necessary to use glass-coated wires and pyromellitimide varnish for the heater of the sample container. The zeolite was a sample of 5A sieve given by Union Carbide Corp. and had the composition 0.23 Na O, 0.77 CaO, ALO3, 1.89 SiOo. 

Paukov et al. (6) have measured low temperature heat capacities from 12.11 to 312.22 K in an adiabatic calorimeter. 

Turdakin and Tarasov (9) also measured low temperature heat capacities (55-300 K) in an adiabatic calorimeter. Their values deviate from the adopted Cp by approximately 2%. 

---