Mean spherical approximation MSA

Another linearization of the HNC closure leads to the mean spherical approximation (MSA). For a fluid with a hard core, the MSA is... 

Motivated by a puzzling shape of the coexistence line, Kierlik et al. [27] have investigated the model with Lennard-Jones attractive forces between fluid particles as well as matrix particles and have shown that the mean spherical approximation (MSA) for the ROZ equations provides a qualitatively similar behavior to the MFA for adsorption isotherms. It has been shown, however, that the optimized random phase (ORPA) approximation (the MSA represents a particular case of this theory), if supplemented by the contribution of the second and third virial coefficients, yields a peculiar coexistence curve. It exhibits much more similarity to trends observed in... 

Secondly, the solvent has been introduced on the same footing as the ions. For low values of the charge the mean spherical approximation (MSA) has been extensively used, whereas some more complicated approximations are needed to describe the nonlinear behavior versus cr or 0. 

Recent developments of the chemical model of electrolyte solutions permit the extension of the validity range of transport equations up to high concentrations (c 1 mol L"1) and permit the representation of the conductivity maximum Knm in the framework of the mean spherical approximation (MSA) theory with the help of association constant KA and ionic distance parameter a, see Ref. [87] and the literature quoted there in. 

Carnie and Chan and Blum and Henderson have calculated the capacitance for an idealized model of an electrified interface using the mean spherical approximation (MSA). The interface is considered to consist of a solution of charged hard spheres in a solvent of hard spheres with embedded point dipoles, while the electrode is considered to be a uniformly charged hard wall whose dielectric constant is equal to that of the electrolyte (so that image forces need not be considered). 

The Born equation, proposed in 1920, has been modified in various ways in order to get a single equation that can express the experimental ionic solvation energies. In recent years, the so-called mean spherical approximation (MSA) has often been used in treating ion solvation. In the MSA treatment, the Gibbs energy of ion solvation is expressed by... 

The concept of mean spherical approximation (MSA, 3) in Chapter 2) has also been used to reproduce the conductivity data of electrolytes of fairly high concentration [23]. The MSA method applies to both associated and non-associated electrolytes and can give the values of association constant, KA. Although not described here,... 

An important advance in the understanding of microscopic solvation and Onsager s snowball picture has recently been made through the introduction of the linearized mean spherical approximation (MSA) model for the solvation dynamics around ionic and dipolar solutes. The first model of this type was introduced by Wolynes who extended the equilibrium linearized microscopic theory of solvation to handle dynamic solvation [38]. Wolynes further demonstrated that approximate solutions to the new dynamic MSA model were in accord with Onsager s predictions. Subsequently, Rips, Klafter, and Jortner published an exact solution for the solvation dynamics within the framework of the MSA [43], For an ionic solute, the exact results from these author s calculations are in agreement with Onsager s inverted snowball model and the previous numerical calculations of Calef and Wolynes [37]. Recently, the MSA model has been extended by Nichols and Calef and Rips et al. [39-43] to solvation of a dipolar solute. 

Models for solvation in water that allow for a structured solvent do indeed predict a multiexponential response. For instance, the dynamical mean spherical approximation (MSA) for water solvation predicts that solvation of an ion in water is well represented by two characteristic times [38]. Nonetheless, the specific relaxation times differ substantially from the observed behavior [33],... 

From the various possible closures, the mean spherical approximation (MSA) [189] has found particularly wide attention in phase equilibrium calculations of ionic fluids. The Percus-Yevick (PY) closure is unsatisfactory for long-range potentials [173, 187, 190]. The hypemetted chain approximation (HNC), widely used in electrolyte thermodynamics [168, 173], leads to an increasing instability of the numerical algorithm as the phase boundary is approached [191]. There seems to be no decisive relation between the location of this numerical instability and phase transition lines [192-194]. Attempts were made to extrapolate phase transition lines from results far away, where the HNC is soluble [81, 194]. 

This another popular closure [43] deals with spherical particles fluids that interact through an infinite repulsive potential at short range u(r) = +oo for r mean-spherical approximation (MSA) is formulated in terms of an ansatz for the direct correlation function. In this approach, c(r) is supposed to be... 

If the structure is decided by an effective potential ues (r), it was demonstrated in the mean spherical approximation (MSA) that the direct correlation function c(r) should rapidly approach — pMerr (r) for large r (see Section IE). According to Reatto and Tau [131], this relationship, which is asymptotically exact for large distance and low density, holds quite well when the long-range dispersion term of the AS potential, - Cg / r6, and the AT triple-dipole potential, < m3 (r) > (8n/3)vp/r6, are considered, so that the direct correlation function reads... 

The simplest closure relation is the so-called mean spherical approximation (MSA). This approximation is defined by the conditions [25,32]... 

In the mean spherical approximation (MSA) treatment of the ion association in aqueous solutions, the linearity of the relative permittivity and of the hydrated cation diameters with the electrolyte concentration was taken into account and a good fit of the experimental activity and osmotic coefficient was obtained [72-75]. The MSA model was elaborated on the basis of cluster expansion considerations involving the direct correlation function the treatment can deal with the many-body interaction term and with a screening parameter and proved expedient for the interpretation of experimental results concerning inorganic electrolyte solutions [67,75-77]. 

The latest models propose to represent electrolyte solutions as a collections of hard spheres of equal size, ions, immersed in a dielectric continuum, the solvent. For such a system, what is called the Mean Spherical Approximation, MSA, has been successful in estimating osmotic and mean activity coefficients for aqueous 1 1 electrolyte solutions, and has provided a reasonable fit to experimental data for dilute solutions of concentrations up to -0.3 mol dm". The advantage in this approach is that only one... 

The so-called mean spherical approximation (MSA) treatment of the solvation energy should also be mentioned. Within the frame work of that model the electrostatic energy of ions is given by a Born-like expression [25], where the effective radius of the ion is considered to be the sum of the ionic radius and a correction term which depends not only on the solvent molecule diameter but also on the dielectric permittivity. Thus, the effective radius is a function of the frequency of the electromagnetic field. 

One should also mention the so-called mean spherical approximation (MSA) treatment of solvent reorganization [25]. McManis and Weaver [125] considered how the solvent radius and dielectric parameters affect the electron transfer within the frame of this theory. The frequency dependence of the effective radius should cause significant deviations from the Marcus expression for the activation energy of... 

In addition to the short-range interactions between species in all solutions, long-range electrostatic interactions are found in electrolyte solutions. The deviation from ideal solution behavior caused by these electrostatic forces is usually calculated by some variation of the Debye-Huckel theory or the mean spherical approximation (MSA). These theories do not include terms for the short-range attractive and repulsive forces in the mixtures and are therefore usually combined with activity coefficient models or equations of state in order to describe the properties of electrolyte solutions. 

In the physical picture ion-pairs are just consequences of large values of the Mayer /-functions that describe the ion distribution [22], The technical consequence, however, is a major complication of the theory the high-temperature approximations of the /-functions applied, e.g. in the mean spherical approximation (MSA) or the Percus-Yevick approximation (PY) [25], suffice in simple fluids but not in ionic systems. 

In addition to the repulsive part of the potential given by Eq. (4), a short-range attraction between the macroions may also be present. This attraction is due to the van der Waals forces [17,18], and can be modelled in different ways. The OCF model can be solved for the macroion-macroion pair-distribution function and thermodynamic properties using various statistical-mechanical theories. One of the most popular is the mean spherical approximation (MSA) [40], The OCF model can be applied to the analysis of small-angle scattering data, where the results are obtained in terms of the macroion-macroion structure factor [35], The same approach can also be applied to thermodynamic properties Kalyuzhnyi and coworkers [41] analyzed Donnan pressure measurements for various globular proteins using a modification of this model which permits the protein molecules to form dimers (see Sec. 7). 

The result (10) is consistent with the observation that energy of interaction is proportional to the diameter I) of the macrospheres. Thus, the HNC approximation predicts correctly that W (x) is proportional to D whereas both the PY approximation and mean spherical approximation (MSA) both lead to the incorrect prediction that W(x) is proportional to the logarithm of D. This is because both the PY approximation and MSA are linearized versions of the HNC approximation. If the PY approximation or the MSA are used for the macroparticle correlations then the ansatz,... 

This approximation is known as the mean spherical approximation (MSA). For the case of a hard-sphere fluid for which u r) = 0, the MSA is equivalent to the PY approximation. For the case that the hard spheres have embedded point charges, the function u(r) is simply Coulomb s law. Although the MSA provides the least detailed expression for c(r), it is popular because the OZ equation can often be solved using this approximation to yield an analytical expression for g(r). The equation for g(r) within a hard sphere is... 

For separations outside the hard core, the direct correlation functions have to be approximated. Classic closure approximations recently applied to QA models axe the Percus-Yevick (PY) closure [301], the mean spherical approximation (MSA) [302], and the hypernetted chain (HNC) closure [30]. None of these relations, when formulated for the replicated system, contains any coupling between different species, and wc can directly proceed to the limit n — 0. The PY closure then implies... 

---