Reorganization solvent

Bimolecular electron-transfer reactions in solutions frequently have rates limited by the diffusion of the donor and acceptor molecules, because one or both of the reactant species is usually at a low concentration relative to the solvent. To obtain a detailed mechanistic and kinetic understanding of electron-transfer reactions in solutions, chemists have devised ingenious schemes in which the two reactants, the donor and acceptor, are held in a fixed distance and orientation so that diffusion will not complicate the study of the intrinsic electron-transfer rates. Recent developments, however, have led to theoretical models in which the orientation and the distance are changeable (see Rubtsov et al. 1999). 

Last time, electron-transfer reactions were frequently performed in micellar media. Analyzing temperature effects on electron transfer from aromatic amines to coumarins in aqueous Trilon X-100 micelles, Kumbhakar et al. (2006) deduced that the two-dimensional electron-transfer (2DET) model is more suitable to explain the results obtained than the conventional electron-transfer theories. The model is detailed in the article by Kumbhakar et al. (2006) and references therein. 

---

The latter is, except for a couple of terms related to solvent reorganization, the Marcus equation. The central idea is that the activation energy can be decomposed into a component characteristic of the reaction type, the intrinsic activation energy, and a correction due to the reaction energy being different from zero. Similar reactions should have similar intrinsic activation energies, and the Marcus equation obeys both the BEP... 

In order to simplify the expression for G, one has to employ a sufficiently simple model for the vibrational modes of the system. In the present case, the solvent contribution to the rate constant is expressed by a single parameter E, the solvent reorganization energy. In addition, frequency changes between the initial and final states are neglected and it is assumed that only a single internal mode with frequency co and with the displacement Ar is contributing to G. Thus the expression for G reduces to [124] ... 

In Eq. (77), x = h(o/2kg T is the reduced internal frequency, q = EJhoi the reduced solvent reorganization energy, p = hElha> the reduced electronic energy gap and / (z) the modified Bessel function of order m. The quantity S is a coupling parameter which defines the contribution of the change in the internal normal mode ... 

In the conversion case, the solvent reorganization energy is very small and thus the one-mode expression [124] for the vibrational overlap factor G is generally adequate such that ... 

Fig. 14. Dependence of the quantity (fito/gy l V )k where k is the rate constant for spin conversion on halkgT as calculated from the single-mode approximation Eq. (79) solid lines) and the full expression Eq. (77) for the value q = 0.3 of the solvent reorganization parameter dashed lines). Data are given for p = — 2.0, 0, -I- 2.0 and for the value of the coupling parameter S = 15. According to Ref. [117]...

In typical outer sphere electron transfer on metal electrodes, A is in the weakly adiabatic region and thus sufficiently large to ensure adiabaticity, but too small to lead to a noticeable reduction of the activation energy. In this case, the rate is determined by solvent reorganization, and is independent of the nature of the metal [Iwasita et al., 1985 Santos et al., 1986]. 

In the case where the bond coordinate can be treated as classical, and when the electronic interaction A is much smaller than the solvent reorganization, the energy of activation can be calculated explicitly in Saveant s [1993] model ... 

The CDC-MOVB method is the appropriate computational approach for studying properties associated with the adiabatic ground state such as the reaction barrier for a chemical reaction and the solvent reorganization energy. 

Such a rate increase at short distances has been observed also by M.E. Michel-Beyerle [12] in time resolved experiments with a photoactivated acri-dinium ion as electron acceptor. This effect can be explained by the influence of the distance on the solvent reorganization energy The solvent reorganization energy is small for charge shifts over short distances, and it increases with the distance until it reaches a plateau. In this plateau area the solvent reorganization energy remains constant and Eq. (1) can be applied ... 

The solvent reorganization term reflects the changes in solvent polarization during electron transfer. The polarization of the solvent molecule can be divided into two components (1) the electron redistribution of the solvent molecules and (2) the solvent nuclear reorientation. The latter corresponds to a slow and rate-determining step involving the dipole moments of the solvent molecules that... 

In this section, we switch gears slightly to address another contemporary topic, solvation dynamics coupled into the ESPT reaction. One relevant, important issue of current interest is the ESPT coupled excited-state charge transfer (ESCT) reaction. Seminal theoretical approaches applied by Hynes and coworkers revealed the key features, with descriptions of dynamics and electronic structures of non-adiabatic [119, 120] and adiabatic [121-123] proton transfer reactions. The most recent theoretical advancement has incorporated both solvent reorganization and proton tunneling and made the framework similar to electron transfer reaction, [119-126] such that the proton transfer rate kpt can be categorized into two regimes (a) For nonadiabatic limit [120] ... 

Fig. 1 Free energy reaction coordinate profiles for hydration and isomerization of the alkene [2] through the simple tertiary carbocation [1+], The rate constants for partitioning of [1 ] to form [l]-OSolv and [3] are limited by solvent reorganization (ks = kteorg) and proton transfer (kp), respectively. For simplicity, the solvent reorganization step is not shown for the conversion of [1+] to [3], but the barrier for this step is smaller than the chemical barrier to deprotonation of [1 ] (kTtOTg > kp).

The difference in the values of ATadd = 900 for hydration of [2] and Kadd 40 for hydration of X-[7] (Table 1) shows that an a-aryl substituent provides substantial stabilization of an alkene relative to the alcohol. The value of kjkp = 1400 for partitioning of Me-[6+]14 is slightly larger than (ks)chem/kp = 600 for partitioning of [1+] that can be calculated by correcting the observed ratio of ks/kp = 60 (Table 1) for the difference in the values of ks = fcreorg = 1011 s -1 for solvent addition that is limited by solvent reorganization and ( s)chem = 1012 s I estimated for chemical bond formation between solvent and [1+] (see previous section). 

As with the Marcus-Hush model of outer-sphere electron transfers, the activation free energy, AG, is a quadratic function of the free energy of the reaction, AG°, as depicted by equation (7), where the intrinsic barrier free energy (equation 8) is the sum of two contributions. One involves the solvent reorganization free energy, 2q, as in the Marcus-Hush model of outer-sphere electron transfer. The other, which represents the contribution of bond breaking, is one-fourth of the bond dissociation energy (BDE). This approach is... 

Carbonyl compounds are also suited to the investigation of the role of solvent reorganization in the dynamics of intramolecular dissociative electron transfer as observed in a series of phenacyl derivatives bearing various leaving groups.199... 

---