Matrix model resolution

The estimated model parameters are the wt ighled averages of t.hc true model parameters, where the weights are deti rmined l.)v the rows of the modt l resolution matrix. In the case when R, I. llu model ])aranietcrs are exactly determined. Like the data re.solutioii matrix, tlu model resolution matiix is corntiletely dt termined l)y the matrix of the opt iator of the forward problem. 

A method of resolution that makes a very few a priori assumptions is based on principal components analysis. The various forms of this approach are based on the self-modeling curve resolution developed in 1971 (55). The method requites a data matrix comprised of spectroscopic scans obtained from a two-component system in which the concentrations of the components are varying over the sample set. Such a data matrix could be obtained, for example, from a chromatographic analysis where spectroscopic scans are obtained at several points in time as an overlapped peak elutes from the column. 

The picture of cement microstructure that now emerges is of particles of partially degraded glass embedded in a matrix of calcium and aluminium polyalkenoates and sheathed in a layer of siliceous gel probably formed just outside the particle boundary. This structure (shown in Figure 5.17) was first proposed by Wilson Prosser (1982, 1984) and has since been confirmed by recent electron microscopic studies by Swift Dogan (1990) and Hatton Brook (1992). The latter used transmission electron microscopy with high resolution to confirm this model without ambiguity. 

The spatial temperature distribution established under steady-state conditions is the result both of thermal conduction in the fluid and in the matrix material and of convective flow. Figure 2. 9.10, top row, shows temperature maps representing this combined effect in a random-site percolation cluster. The convection rolls distorted by the flow obstacles in the model object are represented by the velocity maps in Figure 2.9.10. All experimental data (left column) were recorded with the NMR methods described above, and compare well with the simulated data obtained with the aid of the FLUENT 5.5.1 [40] software package (right-hand column). Details both of the experimental set-up and the numerical simulations can be found in Ref. [8], The spatial resolution is limited by the same restrictions associated with spin... 

At this point it is important to note that the flow model (a hydrologic cycle model) can be absent from the overall model. In this case the user has to input to the solute module [i.e., equation (1)] the temporal (t) and spatial (x,y,z) resolution of both the flow (i.e., soil moisture) velocity (v) and the soil moisture content (0) of the soil matrix. This approach is employed by Enfield et al. (12) and other researchers. If the flow (moisture) module is not absent from the model formulation (e.g., 14). then the users are concerned with input parameters, that may be frequently difficult to obtain. The approach to be undertaken depends on site specificity and available monitoring data. 

One recent advance in MS hardware that has been found to be useful for metabolite identification studies is the Orbitrap. This MS has a mass resolution of 30,000 to 100,000 (two models). For many applications, 30,000 mass resolution capability is sufficient. While only a few current literature references cite the Orbitrap MS for metabolite identification, it is safe to predict that the Orbitrap will be the subject of many references in the future. Two references related to its use for metabolite identification are Peterman et al.190 and Lim et al.182 Lim s group related an an impressive example of the use of high mass resolution to differentiate a metabolite from a co-eluting isobaric matrix component, as shown in Figure 7.14. 

More commonly, we are faced with the need for mathematical resolution of components, using their different patterns (or spectra) in the various dimensions. That is, literally, mathematical analysis must supplement the chemical or physical analysis. In this case, we very often initially lack sufficient model information for a rigorous analysis, and a number of methods have evolved to "explore the data", such as principal components and "self-modeling analysis (21), cross correlation (22). Fourier and discrete (Hadamard,. . . ) transforms (23) digital filtering (24), rank annihilation (25), factor analysis (26), and data matrix ratioing (27). 

Another classification of model is related to the time and space scales of interest. Ambient air quality standards are stated for measurement averaging periods varying from an hour to a year. However, for computational purposes, it is often necessary to use periods of less than an hour for a typical resolution-cell size in a model. Spatial scales of interest vary from a few tenths of a meter (e.g., for the area immediately adjacent to a roadway) up to hundreds of kilometers (e.g., in simulations that will elucidate urban-rural interactions). Large spatial scales are also warranted when multiday simulations are necessary for even a moderate-sized urban area. Under some climatologic conditions, recirculations can cause interaction of today s pollution with tomorrow s. Typical resolution specifications couple spatial scales with temporal sc es. Therefore, the full matrix of time scales and space scales is not needed, because of the dependence of time scales on space scales. Some typical categories by scale are as follows ... 

Snel M, Fuller M (2010) High-spatial resolution matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization imaging analysis of glucosylceramide in spleen sections from a mouse model of gaucher disease. Anal Chem 82(9) 3664-3670. doi 10.1021/ac902939k... 

The resolution of a multicomponent system involves the description of the variation of measurements as an additive model of the contributions of their pure constituents [1-10]. To do so, relevant and sufficiently informative experimental data are needed. These data can be obtained by analyzing a sample with a hyphenated technique (e.g., HPLC-DAD [diode array detection], high-performance liquid chromatography-DAD) or by monitoring a process in a multivariate fashion. In these and similar examples, all of the measurements performed can be organized in a table or data matrix where one direction (the elution or the process direction) is related to the compositional variation of the system, and the other direction refers to the variation in the response collected. The existence of these two directions of variation helps to differentiate among components (Figure 11.1). 

Resolution methods are often divided in iterative and noniterative methods. Most noniterative methods are one-step calculation algorithms that focus on the one-at-a-time recovery of either the concentration or the response profile of each component. Once all of the concentration (C) or response (S) profiles are recovered, the other member of the matrix pair, C and S, is obtained by least-squares according to the general CR model, D = CST [32-38],... 

Both PCA and MCR-ALS can be easily extended to complex data arrays ordered in more than two ways or modes, giving three-way data arrays (data cubes or parallelepipeds) or multiway data arrays. In PCA and MCR-ALS, the multiway data set is unfolded prior to data analysis to give an augmented two-way data matrix. After analysis is complete, the resolved two-way profiles can be regrouped to recover the profiles in the three modes. The current state of the art in multiway data analysis includes, however, other methods where the structure of the multiway data array is explicitly built into the model and fixed during the resolution process. Among these... 

Principal component analysis (PCA) and multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) were applied to the augmented columnwise data matrix D1"1", as shown in Figure 11.16. In both cases, a linear mixture model was assumed to explain the observed data variance using a reduced number of contamination sources. The bilinear data matrix decomposition used in both cases can be written by Equation 11.19 ... 

---