Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Matrix effects physical

Other effects. In addition to the compound formation and ionisation effects which have been considered, it is also necessary to take account of so-called matrix effects. These are predominantly physical factors which will influence the amount of sample reaching the flame, and are related in particular to factors such as the viscosity, the density, the surface tension and the volatility of the solvent used to prepare the test solution. If we wish to compare a series of solutions, e.g. a series of standards to be compared with a test solution, it is clearly essential that the same solvent be used for each, and the solutions should not differ too widely in their bulk composition. This procedure is commonly termed matrix matching. [Pg.794]

Discontinuity between the physical form of the sample and reference material used can lead to error. This is another manifestation of the matrix effect, but one which has to be considered when analyzing biological and environmental samples. There is no easy answer to the relationship between partide size and homogeneity. It is a popular assumption that the smaller the partide size the less the degree of heterogeneity. In some cases this may be true but there are a number of considerations. [Pg.243]

The method using GC/MS with selected ion monitoring (SIM) in the electron ionization (El) mode can determine concentrations of alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor and other major corn herbicides in raw and finished surface water and groundwater samples. This GC/MS method eliminates interferences and provides similar sensitivity and superior specificity compared with conventional methods such as GC/ECD or GC/NPD, eliminating the need for a confirmatory method by collection of data on numerous ions simultaneously. If there are interferences with the quantitation ion, a confirmation ion is substituted for quantitation purposes. Deuterated analogs of each analyte may be used as internal standards, which compensate for matrix effects and allow for the correction of losses that occur during the analytical procedure. A known amount of the deuterium-labeled compound, which is an ideal internal standard because its chemical and physical properties are essentially identical with those of the unlabeled compound, is carried through the analytical procedure. SPE is required to concentrate the water samples before analysis to determine concentrations reliably at or below 0.05 qg (ppb) and to recover/extract the various analytes from the water samples into a suitable solvent for GC analysis. [Pg.349]

Practically all classical methods of atomic spectroscopy are strongly influenced by interferences and matrix effects. Actually, very few analytical techniques are completely free of interferences. However, with atomic spectroscopy techniques, most of the common interferences have been studied and documented. Interferences are classified conveniently into four categories chemical, physical, background (scattering, absorption) and spectral. There are virtually no spectral interferences in FAAS some form of background correction is required. Matrix effects are more serious. Also GFAAS shows virtually no spectral interferences, but... [Pg.606]

ICP-AES and ICP-MS analyses are hampered in almost all cases by the occurrence of sample matrix effects. The origins of these effects are manifold, and have been traced partly to physical and chemical aerosol modifications inside sample introduction components (nebulisation effects). Matrix effects in ICP-AES may also be attributed to effects in the plasma, resulting from easily ionised elements and spectral background interferences (most important source of systematic errors). Atomic lines are usually more sensitive to matrix effects than are ionic lines. There exist several options to overcome matrix interferences in multi-element analysis by means of ICP-AES/MS, namely ... [Pg.621]

Measurement caused by concurrent reactions or incomplete reaction processes in the case of chemical principles, and by instrumental deviations and wrong adjustment in the case of physical methods. A frequently encountered reason for the occurrence of systematic deviations is erroneous calibration due to unsuitable calibration standards, matrix effects, or insufficient methodical or theoretical foundation. [Pg.93]

It is critical when performing quantitative GC/MS procedures that appropriate internal standards are employed to account for variations in extraction efficiency, derivatization, injection volume, and matrix effects. For isotope dilution (ID) GC/MS analyses, it is crucial to select an appropriate internal standard. Ideally, the internal standard should have the same physical and chemical properties as the analyte of interest, but will be separated by mass. The best internal standards are nonradioactive stable isotopic analogs of the compounds of interest, differing by at least 3, and preferably by 4 or 5, atomic mass units. The only property that distinguishes the analyte from the internal standard in ID is a very small difference in mass, which is readily discerned by the mass spectrometer. Isotopic dilution procedures are among the most accurate and precise quantitative methods available to analytical chemists. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that internal standards of the same basic structure compensate for matrix effects in MS. Therefore, in the ID method, there is an absolute reference (i.e., the response factors of the analyte and the internal standard are considered to be identical Pickup and McPherson, 1976). [Pg.183]

This book shows that great progress has been made in using the 2-matrix effectively, especially in chemistry. 1 believe that the role of RDM for condensed matter physics is just as important as in chemistry. Some of these connections will be explored in later chapters. [Pg.9]

One hypothesis is that this phenomenon may be due to a competition between nonvolatile matrix components and analyte ions for access to the droplet surface for transfer to the gas phase. This competition can enhance or suppress the signal depending on the environment in which the ionization and the ion evaporation processes take place therefore, the presence of a matrix can influence ion formation. Chemical-physical properties of the analytes, and in particular polarity, play a role on the degree of matrix effects that have a strong influence on the analytical precision of the method, and in particular, on the sensitivity and the limit of quantification [37]. [Pg.238]

APCI is widely used nowadays in different application fields for low molecular weight analytes. Many of them can either be analyzed with ESI or APCI, and the choice of the method should take into account several aspects, such as the physical-chemical properties of the molecule, the mobile phase composition and the required flow rate, and possible matrix effects. Typical APCI applications are in pharmaceutical, environmental, and food safety analysis. [Pg.241]

After immobilizing this enzyme on the surface of insoluble matrix by physical adsorption, it was found that the Ka% value was increased to 0.08 mol/L whereas the rfl ax value stayed the same as rmax. What is the effectiveness factor of the immobilized enzyme when the substrate concentration is 1 mol/L ... [Pg.67]

For some thermoplastics such as PEI, a toughening effect is observed even in the absence of reactive end groups (no covalent bonds are formed with the matrix). Possibly, physical interactions are strong enough to produce an adequate adhesion level for toughening purposes. [Pg.416]

This paper discusses SIMS as a multi-dimensional technique for the analysis of inorganic and organic materials. The paper is divided into two parts inorganic and organic (or molecular) SIMS. The inorganic SIMS part focuses on the methods of quantitative analysis and depth profiling applications. In particular, SIMS matrix effects are defined and the physical models and empirical methods used to quantify SIMS results are reviewed. [Pg.162]

Different developed analytical method are discussed in this chapter related to the determination of illicit substances in blood (either whole blood, plasma, or serum), OF, urine, and hair. These methods take into consideration the particular chemical and physical composition of the matrix and applies each time a suitable pretreatment to remove interfering and matrix effect, to maximize recoveries and to achieve a suitable enrichment if necessary. For liquid matrices the applications of the most common techniques are considered from simple PPT to SPE and LLE the results of recent works from literature are reported and new trends as online SPE, pSPE, automated LLE (SLE) or MAE are examined. Several stationary phases have been shown to be suitable for determination of illicit drugs Cl8, pentafluorophenyl, strong cation-exchange, and HILIC columns. The trend toward fast chromatography is investigated, both UHPLC and HPLC with appropriate arrangements moreover, results obtained with different ion sources, ESI, A PCI, and APPI are compared. [Pg.390]

Deposition of sample on the sampler, skimmer, ion optics, and other parts of the interface can lead to elevated blank levels as well as drift. This, in combination with the space-charge-induced chemical matrix effects, often requires further dilution of samples than is desirable. This can also limit the range of concentrations that can be measured for a set of samples even though the dynamic range may in theory be sufficient. An improved understanding of the chemical and physical characteristics of the deposition process and means to minimize them is needed. [Pg.143]

Physical and chemical effects can be combined for identification as sample matrix effects. Matrix effects alter the slope of calibration curves, while spectral interferences cause parallel shifts in the calibration curve. The water-methanol data set contains matrix effects stemming from chemical interferences. As already noted in Section 5.2, using the univariate calibration defined in Equation 5.4 requires an interference-free wavelength. Going to multivariate models can correct for spectral interferences and some matrix effects. The standard addition method described in Section 5.7 can be used in some cases to correct for matrix effects. Severe matrix effects can cause nonlinear responses requiring a nonlinear modeling method. [Pg.135]


See other pages where Matrix effects physical is mentioned: [Pg.215]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.33]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



Matrix effects

Physical matrix

© 2024 chempedia.info