Mass-velocity relativistic correction

The scalar relativistic contribution is computed as the first-order Darwin and mass-velocity corrections from the ACPF/MTsmall wave function, including inner-shell correlation. 

Here we propose a new reduced-cost variant of W1 theory which we shall denote Wlc (for cheap ), with Wlch theory being derived analogously from Wlh theory. Specifically, the core correlation and scalar relativistic steps are replaced by the approximations outlined in the previous two sections, i.e. the MSFT bond additivity model for inner-shell correlation and scaled B3LYP/cc-pVTZuc+l Darwin and mass-velocity corrections. Representative results (for the W2-1 set) can be seen in Table 2.1 complete data for the molecules in the G2-1 and G2-2 sets are available through the World Wide Web as supplementary material [63] to the present paper. 

It comprises the non-relativistic Hamiltonian of the form pf/2me + V and the relativistic correction terms, such as the mass-velocity operator —pf/8m c2, the Darwin term proportional to Pi E and the spin-orbit coupling term proportional... 

In M0ller-Plesset theory, first-order perturbation theory does not improve on the HF energy because the zeroth-order Hamiltonian is not itself the HF Hamiltonian. However, first-order perturbation theory can be useful for estimating energetic effects associated with operators that extend the HF Hamiltonian. Typical examples of such terms include the mass-velocity and one-electron Darwin corrections that arise in relativistic quantum mechanics. It is fairly difficult to self-consistently optimize wavefunctions for systems where these tenns are explicitly included in the Hamiltonian, but an estimate of their energetic contributions may be had from simple first-order perturbation theory, since that energy is computed simply by taking the expectation values of the operators over the much more easily obtained HF wave functions. 

The relativistic correction of the mass variation with velocity depends essentially on the fourth power of the nabla operator [68b]. In fact one can write the involved integral as ... 

The so-called mass-velocity term Hmv /which represents the first order (in a ) relativistic correction to the non-relativistic kinetic energy operator... 

We can now turn to a discussion of how relativistic effects will modify the molecular energies, Eab (or AEab )r as well as their functional dependence on the interatomic distance, Rab-There are two non-zero Relativistic corrections from the first order Hamiltonian, Hi, of Eq. (5). One is the first order correction, T to the kinetic energy from the mass-velocity term, Hmv /and... 

For heavy elements, all of the above non-relativistic methods become increasingly in error with increasing nuclear charge. Dirac 47) developed a relativistic Hamiltonian that is exact for a one-electron atom. It includes relativistic mass-velocity effects, an effect named after Darwin, and the very important interaction that arises between the magnetic moments of spin and orbital motion of the electron (called spin-orbit interaction). A completely correct form of the relativistic Hamiltonian for a many-electron atom has not yet been found. However, excellent results can be obtained by simply adding an electrostatic interaction potential of the form used in the non-relativistic method. This relativistic Hamiltonian has the form... 

The CASSCF wavefiinction is used as reference function in a second-order estimate of the remaining dynamical correlation effects. All valence electrons were correlated in this step and also the 3s and 3p shells on copper. Relativistic corrections (the Darwin and mass-velocity terms) were added to all CASPT2 energies. They were obtained at the CASSCF level using first-order perturbation theory. A level-shift (typically 0.3 Hartree) was added to the zeroth order Hamiltonian in order to remove intruder states [30]. Transition moments were conputed with the CAS state-interaction method [31] at the CASSCF level. They were... 

Spin-orbit (SO) coupling corrections were calculated for the Pt atom since the relativistic effects are essential for species containing heavy elements. Other scalar relativistic corrections like the Darwin and mass-velocity terms are supposed to be implicitly included in (quasi)relativistic pseudopotentials because they mostly affect the core region of the considered heavy element. Their secondary influence can be seen in the contraction of the outer s-orbitals and the expansion of the d-orbitals. This is considered in the construction of the pseudoorbitals. The effective SO operator can be written within pseudopotential (PS) treatment in the form71 75... 

In addition to correlation, for the transition metals one has to start worrying about relativity. The common wisdom is that relativistic corrections will have little effect on the properties of 3d systems, a small but non-negjigible influence for the 4d series and dramatic, even qualitative, consequences for 5d. For the atoms, Martin and Hay " have evaluated the scalar (mass-velocity and... 

Martin " was the first to estimate the effects of relativity on the spectroscopic constants of Cu2. The scalar relativistic (mass-velocity and Darwin) terms were evaluated perturbatively using Hartree-Fock or GVB (Two configuration SCF (ffg -mTu)) wavefunctions. At these levels the relativistic corrections for r, cu and D, were found to be — 0.05 A, 15 cm and -h0.06eV for SCF, and —0.05 A, + 14 cm and -l-0.07eV for GVB. The shrinking of the bond length is less than half of the estimate based on the contraction of the 4s atomic orbital. 

The non-relativistic PolMe (9) and quasirelativistic NpPolMe (10) basis sets were used in calculations reported in this paper. The size of the [uncontractd/contracted] sets for B, Cu, Ag, and Au is [10.6.4./5.3.2], [16.12.6.4/9.7.3.2], [19.15.9.4/11.9.5.2], and [21.17.11.9/13.11.7.4], respectively. The PolMe basis sets were systematically generated for use in non-relativistic SCF and correlated calculations of electric properties (10, 21). They also proved to be successful in calculations of IP s and EA s (8, 22). Nonrelativistic PolMe basis sets can be used in quasirelativistic calculations in which the Mass-Velocity and Darwin (MVD) terms are considered (23). This follows from the fact that in the MVD approximation one uses the approximate relativistic hamiltonian as an external perturbation with the nonrelativistic wave function as a reference. At the SCF and CASSCF levels one can obtain the MVD quasi-relativistic correction as an expectation value of the MVD operator. In perturbative CASPT2 and CC methods one needs to use the MVD operator as an external perturbation either within the finite field approach or by the analytical derivative schems. The first approach leads to certain numerical accuracy problems. 

---