Darwin correction

Owing to the divergence of the K expansion near the nuclei, the mass-velocity and Darwin corrections can only be used as first-order corrections. An alternative method is to partition eq. (8.13) as in eq (8.24), which avoids the divergence near the nucleus. 

Therefore, it appears that the Darwin corrections contribute similarly as the previous exchange relativistic corrections, but this result can be considered as spurious. It does not match with the weak relativistic limit of the fully relativistic functionals from QED but has been considered (the direct part) in previous work [26] and could be considered in the present approach just replacing the coefficient of (1.5 times n/c ) by 1.25 times tt/c. ... 

In M0ller-Plesset theory, first-order perturbation theory does not improve on the HF energy because the zeroth-order Hamiltonian is not itself the HF Hamiltonian. However, first-order perturbation theory can be useful for estimating energetic effects associated with operators that extend the HF Hamiltonian. Typical examples of such terms include the mass-velocity and one-electron Darwin corrections that arise in relativistic quantum mechanics. It is fairly difficult to self-consistently optimize wavefunctions for systems where these tenns are explicitly included in the Hamiltonian, but an estimate of their energetic contributions may be had from simple first-order perturbation theory, since that energy is computed simply by taking the expectation values of the operators over the much more easily obtained HF wave functions. 

Darwin) corrections at the Hartree-Fock level. Their results for the d" s d" s separation are shown on Fig. 4. While the common wisdom is roughly verified, the relativistic shifts for the later members of the 3d series are probably larger than many would have expected. They certainly cannot be neglected if very high accuracy is required. (A similar statement applies to molecules (see e.g. Cuj below).) Of course Fig. 4 assumes that the relativistic correction can be separated from correlation effects. Martin and Hay reasoned that, since the relativistic correction scales roughly as the valence s-orbital population, correlation effects which change this population would have the most important influence. By using the Cl coefficient for the most important (s -> p ) contribution they estimated that, for Ni, correlation could reduce the relativistic correction of 0.35 eV by about 0.07 eV (probably an upper limit). 

The spin-orbit, mass-velocity and Darwin corrections contained in 8h already appear in the normal state and are thus not of superconducting origin. Nevertheless, their effect on observables in a superconductor can be dramatically modified by superconducting coherence. An example will be given in Section 5.3.5, where we show the dichroic response of a superconductor. 

Molecules that contain heavy elements (in particular 5d transition metals) play an important role in the photochemistry and photophysics of coordination compounds for their luminescent properties as well as for their implication in catalysis and energy/electron transfer processes. Whereas molecular properties and electronic spectroscopy of light molecules can be studied in a non-relativistic quantum chemical model, one has to consider the theory of relativity when dealing with elements that belong to the lower region of the periodic table. As far as transition metal complexes are concerned one has to distinguish between different manifestations of relativity. Important but not directly observable manifestations of relativity are the mass velocity correction and the Darwin correction. These terms lead to the so-called relativistic contraction of the s- and p- shells and to the relativistic expansion of the d- and f- shells. A chemical consequence of this is for instance a destabilisation of the 5d shells with respect to the 3d shells in transition metals. 

For atoms with high atomic numbers it is important that relativistic effects are included in the band-structure calculations. In SCFC we therefore solve the Dirac rather than the Schrodinger equation, but leave out the spin-orbit interaction. In doing so we obtain an effective one-electron equation which is essentially the Schrodinger equation with the important mass-velocity and Darwin corrections included. The present technique is based on unpublished work by O.K. Andersen and U.K. Poulsen. KoelUng and Harmon [9.8] have taken a related approach. 

Finally, transition metals are heavy atoms and one should consider whether relativistic effects need to be considered [45]. In general, apart from using a relativistic effective core potential, relativity is not included for first and second-row metals but must be treated for third-row species. The relativistic effect can be broken down into three components—the Darwin correction (mass-velocity), the Zitterbewegung and spin-orbit coupling. The former two are more or less straightforward to implement and capture most of the relativistic energy. 

The Darwin correction, is a relativistic correction attributed to the electron s Zitterbewegung. It arises from the smearing of the charge of the electron due to its relativistic motion. 

A number of static perturbations arise from internal interactions or fields, which are neglected in the nonrelativistic Born-Oppenheimer electronic Hamiltonian. The relativistic correction terms of the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian are considered as perturbations in nonrelativistic quantum chemistry, including Darwin corrections, the mass-velocity correction, and spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions. Some properties, such as nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensors and shielding polarizabilities, are computed from perturbation operators that involve both internal and external fields. 

Relativistic two-electron Darwin correction to the ground state. 

For comparison, using the rl2-MR-CI method the value —24.65379 a.u., (also <0.1-10 a.u. accurate) [23] was obtained with a very large basis of Gaussian orbitals. The ab initio result from the Diffusion Monte Carlo method is —24.65357(3)a.u. [6], The estimated nonrelativistic energy using theoretical and experimental data is -24.65391 a.u. [13]. The mentioned calculations are less accurate than a microhartree. The relativistic energy value including mass and Darwin corrections is estimated to be —24.659758 a.u. 

As discussed in Sections 15.6.5 and 15.6.6, the most important corrections that must be considered to obtain the experimental equilibrium atomization energies Dg from D ) are the zero-point vibrational correction to the molecular eneigy, the spin-orbit corrections to the atomic energies, and the relativistic mass-velocity and one-electron Darwin corrections to the atomic and noolecular energies ... 

As the reactants and products are all closed-shell molecules, there are no first-order spin-orbit corrections - the only first-order relativistic corrections are the mass-velocity and Darwin corrections (15.8.5), which are similar in magnitude to the anharmonic corrections but of opposite sign. The non-Born-Oppenheimer corrections may be assumed to be small for the reactions considered here. 

---