Mass transport phenomena Diffusion

What characterises the different incubation steps is the time required to reach thermodynamic equilibrium between an antibody and an antigen in the standard format of microtitre plates. In fact the volume used in each of the incubation steps has been fixed between 100 and 200 pL to be in contact with a surface area of approx. 1 cm2 where the affinity partner is immobilised. The dimensions of the wells are such that the travel of the molecule from the bulk solution to the wall (where the affinity partner is immobilised) is in the order of 1 mm. It must be taken into account that the generation of forced convection or even of turbulence in the wells of a microtitre plate is rather difficult due to the intrinsic dimensions of the wells [10]. Indeed, even if some temperature or shaking effects can help the mass transport from the solution to the wall, the main mass transport phenomenon in these dimensions is ensured by diffusion. 

Fortunately, the effects of most mobile-phase characteristics such as the nature and concentration of organic solvent or ionic additives the temperature, the pH, or the bioactivity and the relative retentiveness of a particular polypeptide or protein can be ascertained very readily from very small-scale batch test tube pilot experiments. Similarly, the influence of some sorbent variables, such as the effect of ligand composition, particle sizes, or pore diameter distribution can be ascertained from small-scale batch experiments. However, it is clear that the isothermal binding behavior of many polypeptides or proteins in static batch systems can vary significantly from what is observed in dynamic systems as usually practiced in a packed or expanded bed in column chromatographic systems. This behavior is not only related to issues of different accessibility of the polypeptides or proteins to the stationary phase surface area and hence different loading capacities, but also involves the complex relationships between diffusion kinetics and adsorption kinetics in the overall mass transport phenomenon. Thus, the more subtle effects associated with the influence of feedstock loading concentration on the... 

Our analysis thus far has been built on a defect by defect basis. On the other hand, given the presence of mass transport via diffusion, it is possible for adjacent point defects to find each other and form complexes with yet lower free energies of formation. Two relevant examples of this phenomenon are that of vacancy-interstital pairs and divacancies. 

Permeation is a mass transport phenomenon in which molecules transfer through the polymer from one environment to another through diffusive processes. Mass transport proceeds through a combination of three factors in case of polymers. They are (1) dissolution of molecules in polymer (following absorption at the surface), (2) diffusion of molecules through the material, and (3) desorption from the surface of the material (Crank and Park 1968 Kumins and Kwei 1968). 

Surface diffusion is yet another mechanism that is often invoked to explain mass transport in porous catalysts. An adsorbed species may be transported either by desorption into the gas phase or by migration to an adjacent site on the surface. It is this latter phenomenon that is referred to as surface diffusion. This phenomenon is poorly understood and the rate of mass... 

Bulk or forced flow of the Hagan-Poiseuille type does not in general contribute significantly to the mass transport process in porous catalysts. For fast reactions where there is a change in the number of moles on reaction, significant pressure differentials can arise between the interior and the exterior of the catalyst pellets. This phenomenon occurs because there is insufficient driving force for effective mass transfer by forced flow. Molecular diffusion occurs much more rapidly than forced flow in most porous catalysts. 

In the case that the chemical reaction proceeds much faster than the diffusion of educts to the surface and into the pore system a starvation with regard to the mass transport of the educt is the result, diffusion through the surface layer and the pore system then become the rate limiting steps for the catalytic conversion. They generally lead to a different result in the activity compared to the catalytic materials measured under non-diffusion-limited conditions. Before solutions for overcoming this phenomenon are presented, two more additional terms shall be introduced the Thiele modulus and the effectiveness factor. 

The most common rate phenomenon encountered by the experimental electrochemist is mass transport. For example, currents observed in voltammetric experiments are usually governed by the diffusion rate of reactants. Similarly, the cell resistance, which influences the cell time constant, is controlled by the ionic conductivity of the solution, which in turn is governed by the mass transport rates of ions in response to an electric field. 

Laminar flow reactors are equipped with microstructured reaction chambers that have the desired low Reynolds numbers due to their small dimensions. Mass transport perpendicular to the laminar channel flow is dominated by diffusion, a phenomenon known as dispersion. Without the influence of diffusion, laminar flow reactors could not be used in heterogeneous catalysis. There would be no mass transport from the bulk flow to the walls as laminar flow, in contrast to turbulent flow, cannot mix the flow macroscopically. 

Dispersion is a band-spreading or mixing phenomenon that results from the coupling of fluid flow with molecular diffusion. Diffusion is mass transport due to a concentration gradient. 

Diffusion is one of the basic mass transport mechanisms, which is involved in the control of drag release from numerous drag delivery systems (14-16). Pick was the first to treat this phenomenon in a quantitative way (21), and the textbook of Crank (22) provides various solutions of Pick s second law for different device geometries and initial and boundary conditions. A very interesting introduction into this type of mass transport is given by Cussler (23). 

The present equations relate to nonequilibrium phenomena with the diffu-sivity D referred to as the coefficient of transport diffusion. Following Pick s first law, it is defined as the factor of proportionahty between the particle flux, i.e., a phenomenon of genuine mass transport, and the concentration gradient. Note that this definition does not imply any assumption on the concentration dependence of D (which, as we still shall see, may most significantly depend on the concentration) [87]. This dependence has to be taken... 

---