Mass transfer limitations performance

Metal monoliths have a number of advantages compared to ceramics. They are more robust than ceramic monoliths and have excellent resistance to thermal shock, provided that the metal is not oxidized at high temperatures. The foil sheet that is used to manufacture the walls of the metal monolith is much thinner than the walls in a ceramic monolith (typically 0.05 mm in the metal vesus 0.25 mm in the ceramic). The thinner walls give a larger surface to volume ratio which produces a smaller pressure drop for a given mass transfer limited performance. 

This is explained by a possible higher activity of pure rhodium than supported metal catalysts. However, two other reasons are also taken into account to explain the superior performance of the micro reactor boundary-layer mass transfer limitations, which exist for the laboratory-scale monoliths with larger internal dimensions, are less significant for the micro reactor with order-of-magnitude smaller dimensions, and the use of the thermally highly conductive rhodium as construction material facilitates heat transfer from the oxidation to the reforming zone. 

Owing to its nature as a test reaction, rather the reactor and its operational modes were tested, mainly to determine mass transfer limits (see Section 3.3.11.3). It was also used for kinetic studies on the performance of various catalysts. 

The difference in reactor performance is due to the difference in hydraulic diameters of the reaction channels, i.e. related to varying mass-transfer limitations. The micro channels of the p-gauze platinum catalyst amount to 70 pm, whereas the monoliths have channel/pore diameters of 500-1200 pm. 

Figure 4.55 Varyiation of flow velocities to increase the nitration performance within the mass-transfer limited regime [311.

Since the initial work of Onto et al. (1) a considerable amount of work has been performed to improve our understanding of the enantioselective hydrogenation of activated ketones over cinchona-modified Pt/Al203 (2, 3). Moderate to low dispersed Pt on alumina catalysts have been described as the catalysts of choice and pre-reducing them in hydrogen at 300-400°C typically improves their performance (3, 4). Recent studies have questioned the need for moderate to low dispersed Pt, since colloidal catalysts with Pt crystal sizes of <2 nm have also been found to be effective (3). A key role is ascribed to the effects of the catalyst support structure and the presence of reducible residues on the catalytic surface. Support structures that avoid mass transfer limitations and the removal of reducible residues obviously improve the catalyst performance. This work shows that creating a catalyst on an open porous support without a large concentration of reducible residues on the Pt surface not only leads to enhanced activity and ee, but also reduces the need for the pretreatment step. One factor... 

The effect of the cell density was studied in biodesulfurization of diesel oil by P. delafieldii R-8 [259], An optimum was reported to exist for this biocatalyst as well. Above 25g/L cell density, the specific desulfurization rate decreased. In this case a statistical analysis was not performed to identify the point of mass transfer limitation. 

Intraparticle Mass Transfer. One way biofilm growth alters bioreactor performance is by changing the effectiveness factor, defined as the actual substrate conversion divided by the maximum possible conversion in the volume occupied by the particle without mass transfer limitation. An optimal biofilm thickness exists for a given particle, above or below which the particle effectiveness factor and reactor productivity decrease. As the particle size increases, the maximum effectiveness factor possible decreases (Andrews and Przezdziecki, 1986). If sufficient kinetic and physical data are available, the optimal biofilm thickness for optimal effectiveness can be determined through various models for a given particle size (Andrews, 1988 Ruggeri et al., 1994), and biofilm erosion can be controlled to maintain this thickness. The determination of the effectiveness factor for various sized particles with changing biofilm thickness is well-described in the literature (Fan, 1989 Andrews, 1988)... 

The performance of adsorption processes results in general from the combined effects of thermodynamic and rate factors. It is convenient to consider first thermodynamic factors. These determine the process performance in a limit where the system behaves ideally i.e. without mass transfer and kinetic limitations and with the fluid phase in perfect piston flow. Rate factors determine the efficiency of the real process in relation to the ideal process performance. Rate factors include heat-and mass-transfer limitations, reaction kinetic limitations, and hydro-dynamic dispersion resulting from the velocity distribution across the bed and from mixing and diffusion in the interparticle void space. 

The basic idea is to examine operating parameters to find the optimum combination of them for optimum performance. A short list of the most important might include the following Fj, Cjo, Cj, v, V, T, Tq, u, P, and, of course. For catalytic processes additional variables include D, d, Sg, e, shape, and catalyst chemical properties such as chemical composition, activity, and selectivity. Most catalytic reactors operate with significant mass transfer limitations because one usually wants to raise the temperature until mass transfer becomes noticeable in order to attain the highest rate possible. In all cases one determines the effects of these variables on reactor performance. 

The use of a monolithic stirred reactor for carrying out enzyme-catalyzed reactions is presented. Enzyme-loaded monoliths were employed as stirrer blades. The ceramic monoliths were functionalized with conventional carrier materials carbon, chitosan, and polyethylenimine (PEI). The different nature of the carriers with respect to porosity and surface chemistry allows tuning of the support for different enzymes and for use under specific conditions. The model reactions performed in this study demonstrate the benefits of tuning the carrier material to both enzyme and reaction conditions. This is a must to successfully intensify biocatalytic processes. The results show that the monolithic stirrer reactor can be effectively employed in both mass transfer limited and kinetically limited regimes. 

Catalytic tests were performed in a glass vessel equipped with a stirrer motor. Two monoliths (diameter 4.3 cm, length 4 cm) were mounted in plane on the stirrer axis. The total reaction volume was 2.5 1. Lipase was assayed in the acylation of vinyl acetate with butanol in toluene. Initial reaction rate was followed by GC analysis. Immobilized trypsin was used in the hydrolysis of N-benzoyl-l-arginine ethyl ester (BAEE) in a 0.01 M phosphate buffer pH 8 at 308 K. The reaction was followed by UV-VIS at 253 nm, and reaction rate was calculated in the mass transfer limited situation. 

We have presented a general reaction-diffusion model for porous catalyst particles in stirred semibatch reactors applied to three-phase processes. The model was solved numerically for small and large catalyst particles to elucidate the role of internal and external mass transfer limitations. The case studies (citral and sugar hydrogenation) revealed that both internal and external resistances can considerably affect the rate and selectivity of the process. In order to obtain the best possible performance of industrial reactors, it is necessary to use this kind of simulation approach, which helps to optimize the process parameters, such as temperature, hydrogen pressure, catalyst particle size and the stirring conditions. 

The application of SCF as reaction media for enzymatic synthesis has several advantages, such as the higher initial reaction rates, higher conversion, possible separation of products from unreacted substrates, over solvent-free, or solvent systems (where either water or organic solvents are used). Owing to the lower mass-transfer limitations and mild (temperature) reaction conditions, at first the reactions which were performed in non-aqueous systems will be transposed to supercritical media. An additional benefit of using SCFs as... 

---