Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mass spectrometry quantitative comparison

Chang, Y.-C., Li, C.-M., Li, L.-A., Jong, S.-B., Liao, P.C. and Chang, L.W. (2003). Quantitative measurement of male steroid hormones using automated on-line solid phase extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and comparison with radioimmunoassay. Analyst, 128, 363-368. [Pg.29]

Quantitation using mass spectrometry is no different to quantitation using other techniques and, as discussed above in Section 2.5, involves the comparison of the intensity of a signal generated by an analyte in a sample to be determined with that obtained from standards containing known amounts/concentrations of that analyte. [Pg.70]

Figure 5.67 Reconstructed ion chromatograms for Idoxifene and internal standard (ds-Idoxifene using LC-ToF-MS for (a) double-blank human plasma extract, (b) extract of blank human plasma containing internal standard (IS), and (c) control-blank human plasma spiked with Idoxifene at 5 gml , the LOQ of the method. Reprinted from 7. Chromatogr., B, 757, Comparison between liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and selected-reaction monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantitative determination of Idoxifene in human plasma , Zhang, H. and Henion, J., 151-159, Copyright (2001), with permission from Elsevier Science. Figure 5.67 Reconstructed ion chromatograms for Idoxifene and internal standard (ds-Idoxifene using LC-ToF-MS for (a) double-blank human plasma extract, (b) extract of blank human plasma containing internal standard (IS), and (c) control-blank human plasma spiked with Idoxifene at 5 gml , the LOQ of the method. Reprinted from 7. Chromatogr., B, 757, Comparison between liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and selected-reaction monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantitative determination of Idoxifene in human plasma , Zhang, H. and Henion, J., 151-159, Copyright (2001), with permission from Elsevier Science.
Residues of isoxaflutole, RPA 202248 and RPA 203328 are extracted from surface water or groundwater on to an RP-102 resin solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge, then eluted with an acetonitrile-methanol solvent mixture. Residues are determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) on a Cg column. Quantitation of results is based on a comparison of the ratio of analyte response to isotopically labeled internal standard response versus analyte response to internal standard response for calibration standards. [Pg.510]

Table 8.60 shows the main features of GD-MS. Whereas d.c.-GD-MS is commercial, r.f.-GD-MS lacks commercial instruments, which limits spreading. Glow discharge is much more reliable than spark-source mass spectrometry. GD-MS is particularly valuable for studies of alloys and semiconductors [371], Detection limits at the ppb level have been reported for GD-MS [372], as compared to typical values of 10 ppm for GD-AES. The quantitative performance of GD-MS is uncertain. It appears that 5 % quantitative results are possible, assuming suitable standards are available for direct comparison of ion currents [373], Sources of error that may contribute to quantitative uncertainty include sample inhomogeneity, spectral interferences, matrix differences and changes in discharge conditions. [Pg.651]

Moritz, T. Olsen, J.E. Comparison Between High-Resolution Selected Ion Monitoring, Selected Reaction Monitoring, and Four-Sector Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Quantitative Analysis of Gib-berellins in Milligram Amounts of Plant Tissue. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1711-1716. [Pg.494]

Zhang, H., and Henion, J. (2001). Comparison between liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and selected reaction monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantitative determination of idoxifene in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 757 151-159. [Pg.85]

Gobey, J. S., Janiszewski, J., Credo, G. M., and Bouvier, E. S. P. (2004). A comparison of desorption ionization techniques for small molecule quantitation. In Proceedings of The 52nd ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Nashville, TN. [Pg.357]

Quantitation Once protein expression profiling activities characterize qualitative features, the attention turns to delineating protein interactions and mechanistic pathways responsible for disease. These studies also require rapid sequence determination/confirmation combined with accurate and sensitive quantitative analysis. The quantitation approaches would allow for direct comparison of protein amounts (absolute or relative) from a variety of cellular states. Because of the reasons stated previously, quantitative applications are likely to be less dependent on 2-DGE and rely primarily on formats that involve specific purification and/or chromatographic separation with mass spectrometry. [Pg.76]


See other pages where Mass spectrometry quantitative comparison is mentioned: [Pg.203]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.1029]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.1013]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.52]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.212 ]




SEARCH



Mass spectrometry quantitation

Quantitation spectrometry

Quantitative mass spectrometry

© 2024 chempedia.info