Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spectrometry, mass molecular interferences

Spectral lines of molecular bands emitted by molecules and radicals present in a plasma often interfere with the atomic spectral lines in atomic emission spectrometry. However, in atomic absorption spectrometry the absorption by molecular bands stemming from undissodated molecules in the atom reservoir also leads to systematic errors and requires correction. Furthermore, in mass spectrometry molecular fragments give rise to signals, which can also interfere with the signals... [Pg.25]

Enhanced molecular ion implies reduced matrix interference. An SMB-El mass spectrum usually provides information comparable to field ionisation, but fragmentation can be promoted through increase of the electron energy. For many compounds the sensitivity of HSI can be up to 100 times that of El. Aromatics are ionised with a much greater efficiency than saturated compounds. Supersonic molecular beams are used in mass spectrometry in conjunction with GC-MS [44], LC-MS [45] and laser-induced multiphoton ionisation followed by time-of-flight analysis [46]. [Pg.361]

The table below lists some common spectral interferences that are encountered in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), as well as the resolution that is necessary to analyze them.1 The resolution is presented as a dimensionless ratio. As an example, the relative molecular mass (RMM) of the polyatomic ion 15N160+would be 15.000108 + 15.994915 = 30.995023. This would interfere with 31P at a mass of 30.973762. The required resolution would be RMM/8RMM, or 30.973762/0.021261 = 1457. One should bear in mind that as resolution increases, the sensitivity decreases with subsequent effects on the price of the instrument. Note that small differences exist in the published exact masses of isotopes, but for the calculation of the required resolution, these differences are trivial. Moreover, recent instrumentation has provided rapid, high-resolution mass spectra with an uncertainty of less than 0.01%. [Pg.470]

FAB is most often compared to the soft ionization method known as field desorption (FD) mass spectrometry, a technique in which the sample, deposited on an emitter wire coated with microcrystalline carbon needles, is desorbed under the influence of a high electric field gradient. As usual, bioorganic systems are best represented by both techniques (21, 33). Though FAB is the easier of the two, they are complementary, FAB being particularly suited for the case of extreme thermal lability and FD for the case of chemical lability or matrix interference. Cerny et al. (33) compare the two techniques for the study of coordination complexes and conclude FD is better for molecular-ion determination, while FAB provides better fragmentation information, which is useful in elucidating structures. [Pg.6]

Ion-molecular reactions are used to resolve isobaric interferences, as discussed, in ICP-MS with a collision/reaction cell or by utilizing ion traps. The mass spectra of Sr, Y and Zr (Fig. 6.10a) without O2 admitted into the collision cell and (Fig. 6.10b) with 10 Pa Oj are different. By introducing oxygen, selective formation of YO and ZrO, but not SrO, is observed. This behaviour of different oxide formation is relevant for an interference free determination of Sr. Ultrahigh mass resolving power ICP mass spectrometry (at m/Am 260 000) selectively removes unwanted ions prior to transfer to the FTICR analyzer cell by gas-phase chemical reactions, e.g., for separation of Ca from " Ar+ obtained with a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) mass spectrometer equipped with a 3 tesla superconducting magnet. ... [Pg.187]

Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) extends the capabilities of atom-counting using conventional mass spectrometry, by removing whole-mass molecular interferences without the need for a mass resolution very much better than the mass difference between the atom and its molecular isobar. This technique has been used with great success for the routine measurement of C, Be, " Al, C1 and, recently, (see Table 5.15). Analysis of " C by AMS can, for example, generate dates with a precision that is at least equal to the best conventional beta-particle-counting facility. In many cases, where small sample analysis is required, the AMS method has proved superior (Benkens, 1990). A complete description of AMS can be found in review articles (Litherland et al., 1987 Elmore and Philips, 1978) or recent conference publications. The application of AMS to measurement has been discussed in detail in Kilins et al. (1992). [Pg.223]

The straightforward detection and the identification of chlorinated bisbibenzyls of the bazzanin type were facilitated using laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry without the addition of chemical matrix. The degree of chlorination could be described by the eharacteristic isotope patterns excluding the artifacts doubt [143,144]. The use of this technique for the analysis of low molecular weight compounds is still quite rare because of possible matrix interferences. [Pg.560]


See other pages where Spectrometry, mass molecular interferences is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.1354]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.233]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.47 ]




SEARCH



Mass interference

Mass spectrometry interference

Molecular mass

© 2024 chempedia.info