Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Many-body perturbation theory comparison with

For Three Molecules in Valence Double-Zeta Basis Sets, a Comparison of Energies in Hartrees (H) from the 2-RDM Method with the T2 Condition (DQGT2) with the Energies from Second-Order Many-Body Perturbation Theory (MP2), Coupled-Cluster Method with Single-Double Excitations and a Perturbative Triples Correction (CCSD(T)), and Full Configuration Interaction (FCI)... [Pg.52]

A comparison between experimental and theoretical values for the J (2p) parameter in neon is shown in Fig. 2.14. (The corresponding comparison between experimental and theoretical values for the partial cross section experimental data are given by the solid curve surrounded by a hatched area which takes into account the error bars. Theoretical results from advanced photoionization theories (many-body perturbation theory, R-matrix theory, and random-phase approximation) are represented by the other lines, and they are in close agreement with the experimental data (for details see [Sch86]). The theoretical / (2p) data of Fig. 2.13 are also close to the experimental values, except in the threshold region. [Pg.70]

Recent calculations of the band structure of polyethylene have employed variations of the ab initio method incorporating electron correlation. Sun and Bartlett (1996) utilised many-body perturbation theory to encompass electron correlation in the ab initio framework. Siile et al. (2000) and Serra et al. (2000) have employed variants of DFT. These calculations involved the optimisation of local effective potentials and a local-density approximation respectively. Figure 4.13 shows a comparison of the band structure obtained by Siile et al., Fig. 4.13(d), with those obtained by other ab initio DFT calculations using the Hartree-Fock (HF), Fig 4.13(a), and Slater approaches, Figs. 4.13(b) and (c). [Pg.144]

Comparison with Other Methods. - In volume 1 of this series, I compared the use of second-order many-body perturbation theory in its MP2 form with that of density functional theory and coupled cluster theory. I recorded how the number of hits in a literature search on the string MP2 rises from 3 in 1989 to 854 in 1998. The corresponding results for DFT, the most used semi-empirical method, are 7 growing to 733. By 1998, the number of hits recorded for CCSD stood as 244. [Pg.517]

Constraints were then applied, such that the number of electrons in a orbitals was fixed at six and the number of electrons in n orbitals at four. The results of the two calculations are presented in Table I, where the effects on some of the properties of the nitrogen molecule are given. For comparison the corresponding SCF values are also presented. As can be seen from these results, the effects of the constraints on the CASSCF wavefunction are not negligible. They are, however, considerably smaller than the difference between the CASSCF and the SCF values. Better agreement with experiment can only be obtained by including dynamical correlation effects, for example, by means of a large multireference Cl calculation or a many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) calculation. ... [Pg.408]

Diagrammatic many-body perturbation theory calculations of the correlation energy of various diatomic molecules in their ground states using universal basis sets of even-tempered exponential-type functions. Comparison with other approaches. ... [Pg.460]

These difficulties can be avoided by the comparison of full Cl results with those obtained by approximate methods—such as CEPA, CPF, CP-MET or many-body perturbation theory (MBPT)—using identical basis sets. Proceeding in this way, one exclusively establishes the errors introduced by the corresponding approximations. This approach will be pursued in Section IV.B where pair approaches will be compared with full Cl and other methods aiming for size extensivity. Such a comparison is instructive but clearly not too conclusive since full Cl calculations are available for relatively small systems and small basis sets only. [Pg.522]

Relativistic many-body perturbation theory has been applied to study the polarizabilities of the ions of the francium isoelectronic sequence.This approach, which adopts SOS expressions, decomposes the polarizability into an ionic core contribution, a counterterm compensating for excitations from the core to the valence shell, and a valence electron contribution. These calculations have presented benchmark results for comparison with experiment. A similar relativistic many-body perturbation theory study of the energies and oscillator strengths of the nsij2, npj, ndj, and nfj (n < 6) states of Li has been carried out and has enabled to evaluate the polarizabilities of its ground state. [Pg.45]

The topic of interactions between Lewis acids and bases could benefit from systematic ab initio quantum chemical calculations of gas phase (two molecule) studies, for which there is a substantial body of experimental data available for comparison. Similar computations could be carried out in the presence of a dielectric medium. In addition, assemblages of molecules, for example a test acid in the presence of many solvent molecules, could be carried out with semiempirical quantum mechanics using, for example, a commercial package. This type of neutral molecule interaction study could then be enlarged in scope to determine the effects of ion-molecule interactions by way of quantum mechanical computations in a dielectric medium in solutions of low ionic strength. This approach could bring considerable order and a more convincing picture of Lewis acid base theory than the mixed spectroscopic (molecular) parameters in interactive media and the purely macroscopic (thermodynamic and kinetic) parameters in different and varied media or perturbation theory applied to the semiempirical molecular orbital or valence bond approach [11 and references therein]. [Pg.79]

The elaborated in [R. V. Chepulskii, Analytical method for calculation of the phase diagram of a two-component lattice gas, Solid State Commun. 115 497 (2000)] analytical method for calculation of the phase diagrams of alloys with pair atomic interactions is generalized to the case of many-body atomic interactions of arbitrary orders and effective radii of action. The method is developed within the ring approximation in the context of a modified thermodynamic perturbation theory with the use of the inverse effective number of atoms interacting with one fixed atom as a small parameter of expansion. By a comparison with the results of the Monte Carlo simulation, the high numerical accuracy of the generalized method is demonstrated in a wide concentration interval. [Pg.123]

The concept of calculating the interaction energy of two chemical systems A and B perturbatively is not at all a new idea. The first intermolecular perturbation expansion was proposed [22] just a few years after the foundations of quantum mechanics had been laid. Since then, numerous other expansions, now known under a common name of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory, have been introduced and the perturbation theory of intermolecular forces is now a fully mature approach. Thanks to the development of the many-body SAPT [23] and of a general-utility closed-shell SAPT computer code [24], the perturbative approach to intermolecular interactions has been successfully applied to construct PESs for numerous interacting dimers of theoretical and experimental interest [19-21,25-27]. One of the notable achievements of SAPT is an accurate description of the interactions between water molecules [21,28-32]. A recent paper by Keutsch et al. [33] compares the complete spectra of the water dimer with theoretical predictions obtained using an empirical potential fitted to extensive spectroscopic data, and with the predictions from a SAPT potential. These comparisons show that the latter potential probably provides the best current characterization of the water dimer force field. In another recent application, an SAPT PES for heUum in-... [Pg.46]


See other pages where Many-body perturbation theory comparison with is mentioned: [Pg.228]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.1046]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.33]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.163 ]




SEARCH



Body Perturbation Theory

Many theory

Many-body

Many-body perturbation theory

Many-body theories

Theory, comparison with

© 2024 chempedia.info