Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Photoionization theory

A comparison between experimental and theoretical values for the J (2p) parameter in neon is shown in Fig. 2.14. (The corresponding comparison between experimental and theoretical values for the partial cross section experimental data are given by the solid curve surrounded by a hatched area which takes into account the error bars. Theoretical results from advanced photoionization theories (many-body perturbation theory, R-matrix theory, and random-phase approximation) are represented by the other lines, and they are in close agreement with the experimental data (for details see [Sch86]). The theoretical / (2p) data of Fig. 2.13 are also close to the experimental values, except in the threshold region. [Pg.70]

Methane-to-methanol conversion by gas-phase transition metal oxide cations has been extensively studied by experiment and theory see reviews by Schroder, Schwarz, and co-workers [18, 23, 134, 135] and by Metz [25, 136]. We have used photofragment spectroscopy to study the electronic spectroscopy of FeO" " [47, 137], NiO [25], and PtO [68], as well as the electronic and vibrational spectroscopy of intermediates of the FeO - - CH4 reaction. [45, 136] We have also used photoionization of FeO to characterize low lying, low spin electronic states of FeO [39]. Our results on the iron-containing molecules are presented in this section. [Pg.345]

W. Haag and C. Wrenn, Handbook of Theory and Applications of Direct-reading Photoionization Detectors (PIDs), RAE Systems Inc., Sunnyvale, CA (2002). [Pg.282]

The simple collision theory for bimolecular gas phase reactions is usually introduced to students in the early stages of their courses in chemical kinetics. They learn that the discrepancy between the rate constants calculated by use of this model and the experimentally determined values may be interpreted in terms of a steric factor, which is defined to be the ratio of the experimental to the calculated rate constants Despite its inherent limitations, the collision theory introduces the idea that molecular orientation (molecular shape) may play a role in chemical reactivity. We now have experimental evidence that molecular orientation plays a crucial role in many collision processes ranging from photoionization to thermal energy chemical reactions. Usually, processes involve a statistical distribution of orientations, and information about orientation requirements must be inferred from indirect experiments. Over the last 25 years, two methods have been developed for orienting molecules prior to collision (1) orientation by state selection in inhomogeneous electric fields, which will be discussed in this chapter, and (2) bmte force orientation of polar molecules in extremely strong electric fields. Several chemical reactions have been studied with one of the reagents oriented prior to collision. ... [Pg.2]

Fig. 5. Photoconductivity, a, and photoexcited-carrier-concentration (An and Ap) spectral data for three GaAs-Cr samples, A, B, and C. Also shown is the Lucovsky photoionization cross section [Eq. (45)] for excitation from a level at 0.52 eV. The theory is fitted to the data at 0.53 eV. [From Look (1977a).]... Fig. 5. Photoconductivity, a, and photoexcited-carrier-concentration (An and Ap) spectral data for three GaAs-Cr samples, A, B, and C. Also shown is the Lucovsky photoionization cross section [Eq. (45)] for excitation from a level at 0.52 eV. The theory is fitted to the data at 0.53 eV. [From Look (1977a).]...
Figure 11. Multichannel quantum defect theory simulations of the photoionization cross section of Ar versus excitation wavenumber, in the presence of a DC field of magnitude (a) 0.001 V/cm, (b) 0.1 V/cm, (c) 0.2 V/cm, (d) 0.3 V/cm and (e) 2.0 V/cm. Figure 11. Multichannel quantum defect theory simulations of the photoionization cross section of Ar versus excitation wavenumber, in the presence of a DC field of magnitude (a) 0.001 V/cm, (b) 0.1 V/cm, (c) 0.2 V/cm, (d) 0.3 V/cm and (e) 2.0 V/cm.
Figure 12. Multichannel quantum defect theory simulations of the photoionization cross section of N2, field = 0.3 V/cm (a) near n - 70 and (b) near n = 80, including N = 0, 2, Mj = I channels only, with excitation from J = 2, Mj = 1. Figure 12. Multichannel quantum defect theory simulations of the photoionization cross section of N2, field = 0.3 V/cm (a) near n - 70 and (b) near n = 80, including N = 0, 2, Mj = I channels only, with excitation from J = 2, Mj = 1.
The H2 molecule is a system for which quite recently it has been possible to measure in unprecedented detail state-selected vibrationally and rotation-ally resolved photoionization cross sections in the presence of autoionization [27-29]. The technique employed has been resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization. The theoretical approach sketched above has been used to calculate these experiments from first principles [30], and it has thus been possible to give a purely theoretical account of a process involving a chemical transformation in a situation where a considerable number of bound levels is embedded in an ensemble of continua that are also coupled to one another. The agreement between experiment and theory is quite good, with regard to both the relative magnitudes of the partial cross sections and the spectral profiles, which are quite different depending on the final vibrational rotational state of the ion. [Pg.706]

We have included a discussion of some aspects of the theory of photoionization in this review because it is a simple photochemical reaction and so as to show the extent to which crude detailed calculations reproduce experimental data for the case of a simple photochemical reaction. [Pg.286]

Fig. 6.20 Ionization width vs electric field for the Na (20,19,0,0) level near its crossing with the (21,17,3,0) level from experiment (data points) and from WKB-quantum defect theory (solid line). The levels are specified as (n./q.ni.M) Because the lineshapes are quite asymmetric (except for very narrow lines), the width in this figure is taken to be the FWHM of the dominant feature corresponding to the (20,19,0,0) level in the photoionization cross section. For the narrowest line, experimental widths are limited by the 0.7 GHz laser linewidth. Error limits are asymmetric because of the peculiar fine shapes and because of uncertainties due to the overlapping m = 1 resonance (from ref. 37). Fig. 6.20 Ionization width vs electric field for the Na (20,19,0,0) level near its crossing with the (21,17,3,0) level from experiment (data points) and from WKB-quantum defect theory (solid line). The levels are specified as (n./q.ni.M) Because the lineshapes are quite asymmetric (except for very narrow lines), the width in this figure is taken to be the FWHM of the dominant feature corresponding to the (20,19,0,0) level in the photoionization cross section. For the narrowest line, experimental widths are limited by the 0.7 GHz laser linewidth. Error limits are asymmetric because of the peculiar fine shapes and because of uncertainties due to the overlapping m = 1 resonance (from ref. 37).
This view is been confirmed by an electrochemical product study (Hatta et al. 2001) that is discussed below. The pfCa value of the Thy radical cation has been determined at 3.2 (Geimer and Beckert 1998). When the position at N( ) is substituted by a methyl group and deprotonation of the radical cation can no longer occur at this position, deprotonation occurs at N(3) (Geimer and Beckert 1999 for spin density calculations using density functional theory (DFT) see Naumov et al. 2000). This N(3) type radical is also produced upon biphotonic photoionization of N(l)-substituted Thy anions [reaction (7)] in basic 8 molar NaC104 D20 glasses which allowed to measure their EPR spectra under such conditions (Sevilla 1976). [Pg.219]


See other pages where Photoionization theory is mentioned: [Pg.13]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.41]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 , Pg.41 , Pg.42 , Pg.43 , Pg.44 , Pg.45 , Pg.46 , Pg.47 , Pg.48 , Pg.49 , Pg.50 , Pg.51 , Pg.52 , Pg.53 , Pg.54 , Pg.55 , Pg.56 , Pg.57 , Pg.58 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 , Pg.41 , Pg.42 , Pg.43 , Pg.44 , Pg.45 , Pg.46 , Pg.47 , Pg.48 , Pg.49 , Pg.50 , Pg.51 , Pg.52 , Pg.53 , Pg.54 , Pg.55 , Pg.56 , Pg.57 , Pg.58 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.306 , Pg.307 , Pg.308 ]




SEARCH



Photoion

Photoionization

Photoions

© 2024 chempedia.info