Management indifference

We take a Bayesian approach to research process modeling, which encourages explicit statements about the prior degree of uncertainty, expressed as a probability distribution over possible outcomes. Simulation that builds in such uncertainty will be of a what-if nature, helping managers to explore different scenarios, to understand problem structure, and to see where the future is likely to be most sensitive to current choices, or indeed where outcomes are relatively indifferent to such choices. This determines where better information could best help improve decisions and how much to invest in internal research (research about process performance, and in particular, prediction reliability) that yields such information. 

Turfgrass chemicals are by no means the only toxic hazard faced by average people, nor indeed the most unjust or egregiously unfair one, of course. Consider, for example, the disproportionately high exposure of inner city residents to propoxur, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and permethrin used to treat the insects and pests that are an everyday part of life in poorly maintained structures, rented by absent and indifferent landlords. The use of such chemicals in lawn management is far less directly utilitarian than in inner city homes, however such urban residents face a health hazard where lawn managers face a mere nuisance, if that. 

Now have ability to conceive visions, grand aims, according to the imperatives of the time, and to realize these aims over a long period, often against indifference, resistance or hostility. This is the manager as change agent, practical visionary. 

The nature of these changes is not yet known. One can however manage to make these massive drops coalesce to a homogeneous liquid layer by applying vigorous centrifugii. The coacervate surface again becomes typically liquid as soon as one adds a little indifferent salt (a few m. eq. p. 1). 

OSHA issued one wilhul citation against management for allowing employees to continue working on the same roof without fall protection after the fatality. The agency defines a willful violation as one committed with plain indifference to, or intentional disregard for, employee safety and health. 

We hire all types of individuals. Some are susceptible to getting hurt while others are not. Perhaps some are actually accident-prone. If you believe in this concept, you are a traditional manager you think that employees are hurt by chance. In this case, the safety knowledge may not be up to your requirements. Some employees are eager to work safely, while others are indifferent to safety. It leaves us with a group of employees who may or may not have to be trained on safety. Where do we go from here [4] ... 

The company s safety record and the management s attitude toward safety are likely to be something that you consider when you select an employer. Do not hesitate to ask a prospective employer about safety. You may learn something about their attitude and approach to safety that may help you make important judgments. It is important that you take a positive attitude about safety to your new job, and you will want to work for an employer who has a similar interest in safety. Figure 1.3.2.2 illustrates a situation in the chemical industry where lack of knowledge or an indifferent attitude about safety can pose very serious risks. 

Supply chain management will have no problem whatsoever mapping the new processes in the supply chains and to control them without backlog. The supply chain in our simulation is indifferent towards which processes are performed by which enterprises. 

Even though over the years effective formal QMSs have become more and more visible and seen to be relevant on site, there is still at all levels of the construction community, from operatives up to members of top management, a minority who are indifferent, sceptical or even hostile as to their relevance and utility. In answer to those who doubt, in the next section we set out from first principles the rationale for QMSs. 

Theory Y is another basic philosophy, but this one theorizes that workers are basically good, or at least that workers are not inherently bad or lazy. Theory Y implies that if workers are lazy, indifferent, unwilling to take responsibility, uncooperative, and so on, the responsibility for this behavior lies in management s methods of organization and control. 

---