Lorentz transformation theory

The previous results become somewhat more transparent when consideration is given to the manner in which matrix elements transform under Lorentz transformations. The matrix elements are c numbers and express the results of measurements. Since relativistic invariance is a statement concerning the observable consequences of the theory, it is perhaps more natural to state the requirements of invariance as a requirement that matrix elements transform properly. If Au(x) is a vector field, call... 

The invariance of the theory under inhomogeneous Lorentz transformation implies that a unitary U(a,A) exists, such that... 

I returned to the University of Toronto in the summer of 1940, having completed a Master s degree at Princeton, to enroll in a Ph.D. program under Leopold Infeld for which I wrote a thesis entitled A Study in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Based on Sir A.S. Eddington s Relativity Theory of Protons and Electrons. This book summarized his thought about the constants of Nature to which he had been led by his shock that Dirac s equation demonstrated that a theory which was invariant under Lorentz transformation need not be expressed in terms of tensors. 

The central assumption underlying the standard approach to tachyon theory is that the usual Lorentz transformation also applies to the superluminal case. One therefore simply takes the Lorentz factor [1 — (v/c)2)]1/2 and substitutes v > c into it [27,74]. This leads directly to an imaginary rest mass and propagation time for tachyons, with many difficulties of interpretation [74]. 

The Maxwell-Heaviside theory of electrodynamics has no explanation for the Sagnac effect [4] because its phase is invariant under 7 as argued already, and because the equations are invariant to rotation in the vacuum. The d Alembert wave equation of U(l) electrodynamics is also 7 -invariant. One of the most telling pieces of evidence against the validity of the U(l) electrodynamics was given experimentally by Pegram [54] who discovered a little known [4] cross-relation between magnetic and electric fields in the vacuum that is denied by Lorentz transformation. 

In this second technical appendix, it is shown that the Maxwell-Heaviside equations can be written in terms of a field 4-vector = (0, cB + iE) rather than as a tensor. Under Lorentz transformation, GM transforms as a 4-vector. This shows that the field in electromagnetic theory is not uniquely defined as a... 

In 1948, techniques introduced by Schvttinger and Feynman enabled these difficulties to be avoided, without being removed. Their relativisti-cally covariant development of the theory allowed such infinite terms to be treated unambiguously, and in particular terms which are to be understood as electrodynamic contributions to the charge and mass of a particle were put in a form which is invariant under Lorentz transformations. The program of charge renormalization and renormalization of mass then enabled such terms to be related to the experimentally observed charge and mass of the particle. See also Quantum Mechanics. 

In a strict sense, the classical Newtonian mechanics and the Maxwell s theory of electromagnetism are not compatible. The M-M-type experiments refuted the geometric optics completed by classical mechanics. In classical mechanics the inertial system was a basic concept, and the equation of motion must be invariant to the Galilean transformation Eq. (1). After the M-M experiments, Eq. (1) and so any equations of motion became invalid. Einstein realized that only the Maxwell equations are invariant for the Lorentz transformation. Therefore he believed that they are the authentic equations of motion, and so he created new concepts for the space, time, inertia, and so on. Within... 

In Einstein s special theory of relativity [1,2], the Galilean transformation had to be replaced by the Lorentz transformation, so that the speed of light would be invariant or independent of the relative motion of the observers—in particular, because the assumption f t is no longer correct. In the Lorentz transformation the time is t / t. 

Comparing the classical force Q, given above, the spatial components of X, are X = yQ. verifying the historical fact that Maxwell s theory is covariant under Lorentz transformations. 

Relative motion according to Lorentz transformation refers specifically to unaccelerated uniform motion and is therefore known as special relativity (SR). The theory which developed to also take acceleration into account is known as general relativity (TGR). Based on the demonstration, by Eotvos and others, that there is no difference between the inertial and the gravitational mass of an object, TGR also became the theory of the gravitational field. The world line of an accelerated object appears curved in a Minkowski... 

In this case the probability of the passage of an atom through a layer of matter becomes greater than the one that follows from the usual exponential dependence. This phenomenon, superpenetration of ultrarelativistic A.2e, allows for measurement of the time of conversion of a non-stationary state of e+e, formed in the target, to stationary states and to verify the form of the Lorentz transformations for the time [8]. The theory of superpenetration has been formulated in [9,10,11]. A quantitative calculation shows that even for a film thickness L = 2.5A the deviation from an exponential absorption law reaches 100%. 

In other words, it is the distance, ct, travelled by light in a given time interval which fulfills the role of the fourth coordinate, rather than the time interval itself. The special theory of relativity requires that after a Lorentz transformation the new form of all laws of physics is the same as the old form. The Dirac equation, for example, is invariant under a Lorentz transformation. 

Not only the laws of Nature but also all major scientific theories are statements of observed symmetries. The theories of special and general relativity, commonly presented as deep philosophical constructs can, for instance, be formulated as representations of assumed symmetries of space-time. Special relativity is the recognition that three-dimensional invariances are inadequate to describe the electromagnetic field, that only becomes consistent with the laws of mechanics in terms of four-dimensional space-time. The minimum requirement is euclidean space-time as represented by the symmetry group known as Lorentz transformation. 

Minkowski) as co-ordinates in a four-dimensional space, in which x z ictf represents the square of the distance from the origin a Lorentz transformation then represents a rotation round the origin in this space. Minkowski s idea has developed into a geometrical view of the fundamental laws of physics, culminating in the inclusion of gravitation in Einstein s so-called general theory of relativity. 

As is well known, explicit expressions for the polarization fields can be given such that equation (3) has the requisite properties these expressions, involving multipole series or line integrals, are by no means tmique. That this must be so can be seen from at least two levels of theory. We noted earlier that the notion of an electric field (or a magnetic field) is not invariant with respect to Lorentz transformations under such transformations however V should be an invariant scalar and this implies a definite transformation law for (P(x), M(x) that mixes them, and mirrors that for E(x), B(x) classically both pairs can be shown to be components of skew-symmetric second-rank tensors [7]. Although... 

Figure 3.26 is of special interest in the theory of special relativity (Jennings, 1994) where iy is interpreted as the time axis in four-dimensional Minkowski space. The isotropic lines now define a time cone and the Lorentz transformation is equivalent to a complex rotation. 

The principle of local invariance in a curved Riemannian manifold leads to the appearance of compensating fields. Like the electromagnetic field, which is the compensating field of local phase transformation, the gravitational field may be interpreted as the compensating field of local Lorentz transformations. In modern physics all interactions are understood in terms of theories which combine local gauge invariance with spontaneous symmetry breaking. 

CPT theorem - Atheorem in particle physics which states that any local Lagrangian theory that is invariant under proper Lorentz transformations is also invariant under the combined operations of charge conjugation, C, space inversion, P, and time reversal, T, taken in any order. 

This equation has at least one advantage over the Schrodinger equation ct and x, y, z enter the equation on equal footing, whieh is required by special relativity. Moreover, the Fock-Klein-Gordon equation is invariant with respect to the Lorentz transformation, whereas the Schrodinger equation is not. This is a prerequisite of any relativity-consistent theory, and it is remarkable that such a simple derivation made the theory invariant. The invariance, however, does not mean that the equation is accurate. The Fock-Klein-Gordon equation describes a boson particle because vk is a usual scalar-type function, in contrast to what we will see shortly in the Dirac equation. 

Despite the glorious invariance with respect to the Lorentz transformation and despite spectacular successes, the Dirac equation has some serious drawbacks, including a lack of clear physical interpretation. These drawbacks are removed by a more advanced theory-quantum electrodynamics. 

The Dirac equation is rigorously invariant with respect to the Lorentz transformation, which is certainly the most important requirement for a relativistic theory. Therefore, it would seem to be a logically sound approximation for a relativistic description of a single quantum particle. Unfortunately, this is not true. Recall that the Dirac Hamiltonian spectrum contains a... 

Breit constructed a many-electron relativistic theory that takes into aceount sueh a retarded potential in an approximate way. Breit explicitly considered only the electrons of an atom its nucleus (similar to the Dirac theory) created only an external field for the electrons. This ambitious project was only partly successful because the resulting theory turned out to be approximate not only from the point of view of quantum theory (wifli some interactions not taken into account), but also from the point of view of relativity theory (an approximate Lorentz transformation invariance). 

One of the central problems in the theory of P decay is the determination of the Hamilton operator of the weak interaction (O Eqs. (2.71) and O (2.72)). H should be invariant against proper Lorentz transformation, otherwise it would be possible to determine an absolute time, which is impossible according to the theory of relativity. Then, from Dirac s relativistic wave mechanics for spin 1/2 particles, it follows that there may be five classes of weak interaction terms, each transforming in a particular way under rotation and space inversion scalar (S), vector (V), antisymmetric tensor of second rank (T), axial vector (A), and pseudoscalar (P). As one cannot exclude any of these from the beginning, a linear combination of all five interactions must be considered ... 

---