Charge renormalization

Here, T is the absolute temperature, e is the bulk dielectric constant of the solvent, P is the number of phosphate charges, k is the inverse of the Debye screening length, kB is the Boltzmann constant, qna is the renormalized charge, the interaction between the charges is screened Debye-Hiickel potential, and — j b is the distance between a pair of charges labeled i and /... 

Consider a counterion of absolute valence Zq that is held fixed at a distance r from the polyion. The polyion is modeled within the framework of the Manning line model [31] discussed in Section Chapter II.A. The idea here is that the reduction of a polyion charge is dictated by how far the counterion is from that charge. Hence, the renormalized charge due to counterion condensation is written as qnet = (1 — %(r))q, where q is the bare charge [43]. 

Palberg T, Mdnch W, Bitzer F, Piazza R and Bellini T 1995 Freezing transition for colloids with ad]ustable charge a test of charge renormalization Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 4555-8... 

The correlation functions of the partly quenched system satisfy a set of replica Ornstein-Zernike equations (21)-(23). Each of them is a 2 x 2 matrix equation for the model in question. As in previous studies of ionic systems (see, e.g.. Refs. 69, 70), we denote the long-range terms of the pair correlation functions in ROZ equations by qij. Here we apply a linearized theory and assume that the long-range terms of the direct correlation functions are equal to the Coulomb potentials which are given by Eqs. (53)-(55). This assumption represents the mean spherical approximation for the model in question. Most importantly, (r) = 0 as mentioned before, the particles from different replicas do not interact. However, q]f r) 7 0 these functions describe screening effects of the ion-ion interactions between ions from different replicas mediated by the presence of charged obstacles, i.e., via the matrix. The functions q j (r) need to be obtained to apply them for proper renormalization of the ROZ equations for systems made of nonpoint ions. 

A finite and consistent theory is now obtained if, together with -this renormalization of the external field strength, the renormalized unit of charge is defined as... 

Charge conjugate operator, 545 Charge-current density renormalized, 597... 

The situation is quite different for physisorbed molecules. In that case, there is no transfer of charge, the mechanical renormalization is weaker due to a much weaker metal-molecule bond and also the image interaction is smaller as the molecule probably is adsorbed further out from the surface. In a recent IRS investigation of CO physisorbed on Al(100) the measured frequency is only shifted down a few cm from the gasphase value. However, there is for this system also a short range intermolecular interaction that certainly will affect the vibrational frequency. As yet there exist no theoretical calculations for the van der Waals interaction between a CO molecule and a metal. 

Within models of the sparkle family the effect of the external Coulomb field does not reduce to the renormalization of the orbital energies as it is within the RLMO model (see above). By contrast, the electron distribution also changes when the ligand molecules are put into the field. We model this by classical polarizability. Accordingly the difference between effective charge on atom A in the complex (polarized) and that in the free ligand (non-polarized) is ... 

We remind the reader that according to the common renormalization procedure the electric charge is defined as a charge observed at a very large distance. 

It is not possible for conventional electromagnetic models of the electron to explain the observed property of a point charge with an excessively small radial dimension [20]. Nor does the divergence in self-energy of a point charge vanish in quantum field theory where the process of renormalization has been applied to solve the problem. 

In this connection there is an important question concerning the infinite selfenergy of a point charge in classical as well as in quantum field theory. The latter uses a renormalization process to solve the problem, namely, by subtracting two infinities to end up with a finite result. Despite the success of such a procedure, a more physically satisfactory way is needed [80]. Possibly the present theory may provide such an alternative, by tackling the divergence problem in a more surveyable manner. The finite result of a difference between two infinities due to renormalization theory would then be replaced by a finite result obtained from the product of an infinity and a zero, as demonstrated by the present analysis. 

In 1948, techniques introduced by Schvttinger and Feynman enabled these difficulties to be avoided, without being removed. Their relativisti-cally covariant development of the theory allowed such infinite terms to be treated unambiguously, and in particular terms which are to be understood as electrodynamic contributions to the charge and mass of a particle were put in a form which is invariant under Lorentz transformations. The program of charge renormalization and renormalization of mass then enabled such terms to be related to the experimentally observed charge and mass of the particle. See also Quantum Mechanics. 

Heitler spoke on the quantum theory of damping, which is a heuristic attempt to eliminate the infinities of quantum field theory in a relativistic invariant manner, Peierls spoke of the problem of self-energy, and Op-penheimer gave an account of the developments of the last years in electrodynamics in which he discussed the problem of the vacuum polarization and charge renormalization with special reference to the recent work of Schwinger and Tomonaga. 

The second part of Feynman s speech dealt with theoretical questions. The first one was the problem of the renormalization of the mass of the electron as well as of particles such as the pion and the kaon which exist in charged (tt , K-) and neutral (tt°, K°) states and therefore provide a direct indication of the contribution originating from the electromagnetic field. 

---