Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Liquids molecular interactions

Pzlp = os(z). the wall-molecule distribution function see Chapter 3, Section 3.4). In Figure 6.17a, the density profile at a vapor-liquid interface is represented a relatively smooth density curve is found, which reflects that some molecules are allowed to stick out beyond the limit (in a statistical sense) of the liquid phase. When a hard wall is present, the situation is quite different if it is assumed to be ideally smooth, as in Figure 6.17b, it (along with the liquid molecular interactions) forces the liquid molecules to order into quasi-discrete ordered layers, but this order lasts only for a distance of a few molecular diameters, after which the disordered nature of the liquid prevails. The density at the wall position is zero, and at a distance rjl, a maximum in p is observed, corresponding to the first liquid layer this density, p, is known as the contact value of the density. The midplane density p may or may not approach the bulk density, depending on the wall-wall distance d. Experiments have shown that for water in the presence of mica surfaces, there are about four quasi-ordered water layers, covering a distance of about 1 nm from... [Pg.189]

The most important molecular interactions of all are those that take place in liquid water. For many years, chemists have worked to model liquid water, using molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. Until relatively recently, however, all such work was done using effective potentials [4T], designed to reproduce the condensed-phase properties but with no serious claim to represent the tme interactions between a pair of water molecules. [Pg.2449]

There are two ways in which the volume occupied by a sample can influence the Gibbs free energy of the system. One of these involves the average distance of separation between the molecules and therefore influences G through the energetics of molecular interactions. The second volume effect on G arises from the contribution of free-volume considerations. In Chap. 2 we described the molecular texture of the liquid state in terms of a model which allowed for vacancies or holes. The number and size of the holes influence G through entropy considerations. Each of these volume effects varies differently with changing temperature and each behaves differently on opposite sides of Tg. We shall call free volume that volume which makes the second type of contribution to G. [Pg.249]

In the liquid state molecules are in intimate contact, so the energetics of molecular interactions generally make a contribution to the overall picture of the mixing process. There are several aspects of the situation that we should be aware of before attempting to formulate a theory for ... [Pg.521]

The solvent and the key component that show most similar liquid-phase behavior tend to exhibit little molecular interactions. These components form an ideal or nearly ideal liquid solution. The ac tivity coefficient of this key approaches unity, or may even show negative deviations from Raoult s law if solvating or complexing interactions occur. On the other hand, the dissimilar key and the solvent demonstrate unfavorable molecular interactions, and the activity coefficient of this key increases. The positive deviations from Raoult s law are further enhanced by the diluting effect of the high-solvent concentration, and the value of the activity coefficient of this key may approach the infinite dilution value, often aveiy large number. [Pg.1314]

When a gas comes in contact with a solid surface, under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure, the concentration of the gas (the adsorbate) is always found to be greater near the surface (the adsorbent) than in the bulk of the gas phase. This process is known as adsorption. In all solids, the surface atoms are influenced by unbalanced attractive forces normal to the surface plane adsorption of gas molecules at the interface partially restores the balance of forces. Adsorption is spontaneous and is accompanied by a decrease in the free energy of the system. In the gas phase the adsorbate has three degrees of freedom in the adsorbed phase it has only two. This decrease in entropy means that the adsorption process is always exothermic. Adsorption may be either physical or chemical in nature. In the former, the process is dominated by molecular interaction forces, e.g., van der Waals and dispersion forces. The formation of the physically adsorbed layer is analogous to the condensation of a vapor into a liquid in fret, the heat of adsorption for this process is similar to that of liquefoction. [Pg.736]

Dispersion forces are ubiquitous and are present in all molecular interactions. They can occur in isolation, but are always present even when other types of interaction dominate. Typically, the interactions between hydrocarbons are exclusively dispersive and, because of them, hexane, at S.T.P., is a liquid boiling at 68.7°C and is not a gas. Dispersive interactions are sometimes referred to as hydrophobic or lyophobic particularly in the fields of biotechnology and biochemistry. These terms appear to have arisen because dispersive substances, e.g., the aliphatic hydrocarbons, do not dissolve readily in water. Biochemical terms for molecular interactions in relation to the physical chemical terms will be discussed later. [Pg.64]

An important experimental quantity for studying molecular interactions in gases and liquids is the scattering of laser light. When polarized light is scattered by a fluid, both polarized and depolarized components are produced. The depolarized spectrum is several orders of magnitude less intense than the polarized spectrum and much more difficult to observe. A great deal of information has been obtained about molecular motions from such spectral analyses. [Pg.293]

Finally, a fourth motivation for exploring gas solubilities in ILs is that they can act as probes of the molecular interactions with the ILs. Information can be discerned on the importance of specific chemical interactions such as hydrogen bonding, as well as dipole-dipole, dipole-induced dipole, and dispersion forces. Of course, this information can be determined from the solubility of a series of carefully chosen liquids, as well. FLowever, gases tend to be of the smallest size, and therefore the simplest molecules with which to probe molecular interactions. [Pg.82]

The solubility of water vapor in ionic liquids is of interest because ionic liquids are extremely hygroscopic. In addition, the solubility of water vapor in ILs is an excellent test of the strength of molecular interactions in these fluids. By using the gravi-... [Pg.86]

Both of the above approaches rely in most cases on classical ideas that picture the atoms and molecules in the system interacting via ordinary electrical and steric forces. These interactions between the species are expressed in terms of force fields, i.e., sets of mathematical equations that describe the attractions and repulsions between the atomic charges, the forces needed to stretch or compress the chemical bonds, repulsions between the atoms due to then-excluded volumes, etc. A variety of different force fields have been developed by different workers to represent the forces present in chemical systems, and although these differ in their details, they generally tend to include the same aspects of the molecular interactions. Some are directed more specifically at the forces important for, say, protein structure, while others focus more on features important in liquids. With time more and more sophisticated force fields are continually being introduced to include additional aspects of the interatomic interactions, e.g., polarizations of the atomic charge clouds and more subtle effects associated with quantum chemical effects. Naturally, inclusion of these additional features requires greater computational effort, so that a compromise between sophistication and practicality is required. [Pg.6]

A final point has to do with the relative Insensitivity of the pore averaged dlffuslvlty on the density structure. Both the LADM and the generalized tracer diffusion theory provide a rational explanation for this fact. The reasons for the Insensitivity may be Identified In the double (triple for the tracer diffusion theory) smoothing Induced by the volume averaging and by the very nature of the molecular Interactions In liquids which makes some type of averaging over the densities In the neighborhood of a certain point necessary. [Pg.277]

NMR Self-Diffusion of Desmopressin. The NMR-diffusion technique (3,10) offers a convenient way to measure the translational self-diffusion coefficient of molecules in solution and in isotropic liquid crystalline phases. The technique is nonperturbing, in that it does not require the addition of foreign probe molecules or the creation of a concentration-gradient in the sample it is direct in that it does not involve any model dependent assumptions. Obstruction by objects much smaller than the molecular root-mean-square displacement during A (approx 1 pm), lead to a reduced apparent diffusion coefficient in equation (1) (10). Thus, the NMR-diffusion technique offers a fruitful way to study molecular interactions in liquids (11) and the phase structure of liquid crystalline phases (11,12). [Pg.256]

As previously pointed out in Chapter 2, monomeric stannylene can be in equilibrium with oligomeric species which are formed by tin-tin or tin-substituent inter-molecular interactions. The tendency for the formation of the oligomers increases the more the molecules approach one another. Thus, when passing from the vapor to the liquid phase and finally to the solid state, the molecules usually exhibit quite different structures. In Table 13 examples of the corresponding structural changes are given. [Pg.23]

Most of the experiments for detecting charged macromolecules with FEDs, reported in literature, have been realized using a transistor structure [11-36], Recent successful experiments on the detection of charged biomolecules as well as polyelectrolytes with other types of FEDs, namely semiconductor thin him resistors [39 11], capacitive MIS [42] and EIS structures [43-50], have demonstrated the potential of these structures - more simple in layout, easy, and cost effective in fabrication - for studying the molecular interactions at the solid-liquid interface. A summary of results for the DNA detection with different types of FEDs is given in Table 7.1. [Pg.213]

In fact, most liquid mixtures do not obey Raoult s law particularly well, owing to molecular interactions. [Pg.228]

The quantities that best represent a particular property can often be rationalized on the basis of physical intuition. For example, those that reflect interactions between like molecules, such as heats of sublimation and vaporization, can be expressed well in terms of molecular surface area and the product vofot. A large value for this product means that each molecule has both significantly positive and significantly negative surface potentials, which is needed to ensure strongly attractive inter-molecular interactions, with consequently higher energy requirements for the solid —> gas and liquid —> gas transitions. [Pg.252]

In contrast to the NRTL-SAC model, the UNIFAC model developed by Fredenslund et. al. [29] divides each molecule into a set of functional groups that interact with each other on a binaiy basis and whose interactions are combined together to describe the global liquid phase interaction between molecules. Because the segments in UNIFAC are based on functional groups it is possible to model a system provided that all of the molecular structures are known. The problem with pharmaceutical sized molecules is that existing UNIFAC parameter tables do not contain many of the group interaction parameters that are necessary, and even when they do, the interactions are fitted to a database of chemicals that are much smaller and simpler than pharmaceuticals, and typically fail to represent them adequately. [Pg.55]

Gas-phase solvation has so far given only very indirect evidence concerning the structure and details of molecular interactions in solvation complexes. Complex geometries and force constants, which are frequently subjects of theoretical calculations, must therefore be compared with solution properties, however, the relevant results are obscured by influences arising from changes in the bulk liquid or by the dynamic nature of the solvation shells. With few exceptions, structural information from solutions cannot be adequately resolved to yield more than a semiquantitative picture of individual molecular interactions. The concepts used to convert the complex experimental results to information for structural models are often those of solvation numbers 33>, and of structure-making or structure-... [Pg.46]


See other pages where Liquids molecular interactions is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.7]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.7 , Pg.8 , Pg.9 , Pg.10 , Pg.11 , Pg.12 , Pg.13 , Pg.14 , Pg.15 , Pg.16 , Pg.17 ]




SEARCH



Features of Molecular Interaction in Liquid Media

Liquid with ionic interactions, molecular

Liquids, interactive

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

Molecular liquids

© 2024 chempedia.info