Light momentum

S. B. Smith, Y. Cui, and C. Bustamante, An optical-trap force transducer that operates by direct measurement of light momentum. Methods Enzymol. 361, 134-162 (2003). 

Excited target atoms can be prepared in well-defined states by optical pumping with a tunable laser. Specific magnetic substates are excited by polarised light. Momentum distributions are observed for these states by electron momentum spectroscopy. 

Figure Al.6.16. Diagram showing the directionality of the signal in coherent spectroscopy. Associated with the carrier frequency of each interaction with the light is a wavevector, k. The output signal in coherent spectroscopies is detemiined from the direction of each of the input signals via momentum conservation (after [48a]).

If the experunental technique has sufficient resolution, and if the molecule is fairly light, the vibronic bands discussed above will be found to have a fine structure due to transitions among rotational levels in the two states. Even when the individual rotational lines caimot be resolved, the overall shape of the vibronic band will be related to the rotational structure and its analysis may help in identifying the vibronic symmetry. The analysis of the band appearance depends on calculation of the rotational energy levels and on the selection rules and relative intensity of different rotational transitions. These both come from the fonn of the rotational wavefunctions and are treated by angnlar momentum theory. It is not possible to do more than mention a simple example here. 

It is well known that a light beam carries momentum and tliat tire scattering of light by an object produces a force. This property of light was first demonstrated by Frisch [K)] tlirough tire observation of a very small transverse... 

Basically, Newtonian mechanics worked well for problems involving terrestrial and even celestial bodies, providing rational and quantifiable relationships between mass, velocity, acceleration, and force. However, in the realm of optics and electricity, numerous observations seemed to defy Newtonian laws. Phenomena such as diffraction and interference could only be explained if light had both particle and wave properties. Indeed, particles such as electrons and x-rays appeared to have both discrete energy states and momentum, properties similar to those of light. None of the classical, or Newtonian, laws could account for such behavior, and such inadequacies led scientists to search for new concepts in the consideration of the nature of reahty. 

The magnetic moments of the heavy RE elements (Gd, Tb, Dy, etc) are coupled antiparallel to the magnetic moments of the TM elements (Fe, Co, etc). The REj TM alloys are therefore ferrimagnetic below their Curie temperature (T )- The heavy TM moments form one magnetic sublattice and the RE moments the other one. In contrast, the light RE moments (eg, Nd, Pr) couple parallel to the moments of TM. The RE spia is always antiparallel to the TM spia, but for the light RE elements, the orbital momentum is coupled antiparallel to the spia and larger than the spia. 

Semiconductors can be divided into two groups direct and indirect band gap materials. In direct semiconductors the minimum energy in the conduction band and the maximum in the valence band occur for the same value of the electron momentum. This is not the case in indirect materials. The difference has profound consequences for the transitions of electrons across the band gap in which light is emitted, the radiative transitions, of interest here. 

The gas around the arc plasma takes away a part of its heat by radiatioii. At high temperatures, the gas loses its specific gravity, becomes light weight and diminishes in momentum (< mv ). As a result, the gas is rendered incapable of penetrating through the arc plasma to quench it. The flow of gas through the thick of the arc plasma is thus impeded. 

We shall call an amplitude ( ), which satisfies Eq. (9-516), a transversal amplitude.20 We can summarize the above statements as follows in momentum space, a one-photon amplitude u(k) is defined on the forward light cone, i.e., for Jc2 = 0, k0 > 0, and satisfies the subsidiary... 

Here p is the radius of the effective cross-section, (v) is the average velocity of colliding particles, and p is their reduced mass. When rotational relaxation of heavy molecules in a solution of light particles is considered, the above criterion is well satisfied. In the opposite case the situation is quite different. Even if the relaxation is induced by collisions of similar particles (as in a one-component system), the fraction of molecules which remain adiabatically isolated from the heat reservoir is fairly large. For such molecules energy relaxation is much slower than that of angular momentum, i.e. xe/xj > 1. 

Rosenstock (55) pointed out that the initial formulation of the theory failed to consider the effect of angular momentum on the decomposition of the complex. The products of reaction must surmount a potential barrier in order to separate, which is exactly analogous to the potential barrier to complex formation. Such considerations are implicit in the phase space theory of Light and co-workers (34, 36, 37). These restrictions limit the population of a given output channel of the reaction com-... 

Consider now spin-allowed transitions. The parity and angular momentum selection rules forbid pure d d transitions. Once again the rule is absolute. It is our description of the wavefunctions that is at fault. Suppose we enquire about a d-d transition in a tetrahedral complex. It might be supposed that the parity rule is inoperative here, since the tetrahedron has no centre of inversion to which the d orbitals and the light operator can be symmetry classified. But, this is not at all true for two reasons, one being empirical (which is more of an observation than a reason) and one theoretical. The empirical reason is that if the parity rule were irrelevant, the intensities of d-d bands in tetrahedral molecules could be fully allowed and as strong as those we observe in dyes, for example. In fact, the d-d bands in tetrahedral species are perhaps two or three orders of magnitude weaker than many fully allowed transitions. 

Since IR detector materials are direct bandgap materials (with no change in electron momentum required), they are very efficient absorbers (and emitters) of light - all IR photons are absorbed within the first few /rm of material. The reason that infrared detectors are 10 to 15 ptm thick is for structural and fabrication reasons, not for light absorption reasons. 

---