Parity rules

A particular totalistic class of FA that have been found to support literally thousands of distinct solitons are called parity-rule FA (PFA), and are defined by... 

A typical evolution of a disordered state under a radius r = 3 parity-rule FA, showing a dissolution into, and subsequent soliton-like interaction between, several particles with different velocities, is shown in figure 3.37. 

Fig. 3.37 Typical soliton-like evolution of the range r = 3 parity-rule filter automata, starting from an initially disordered state.

Consider now spin-allowed transitions. The parity and angular momentum selection rules forbid pure d d transitions. Once again the rule is absolute. It is our description of the wavefunctions that is at fault. Suppose we enquire about a d-d transition in a tetrahedral complex. It might be supposed that the parity rule is inoperative here, since the tetrahedron has no centre of inversion to which the d orbitals and the light operator can be symmetry classified. But, this is not at all true for two reasons, one being empirical (which is more of an observation than a reason) and one theoretical. The empirical reason is that if the parity rule were irrelevant, the intensities of d-d bands in tetrahedral molecules could be fully allowed and as strong as those we observe in dyes, for example. In fact, the d-d bands in tetrahedral species are perhaps two or three orders of magnitude weaker than many fully allowed transitions. 

Now look at octahedral complexes, or those with any other environment possessing a centre of symmetry e.g. square-planar). These present a further problem. The process of violating the parity rule is no longer available, for orbitals of different parity do not mix under a Hamiltonian for a centrosymmetric molecule. Here the nuclear arrangement requires the labelling of d functions as g and of p functions as m in centrosymmetric complexes, d orbitals do not mix with p orbitals. And yet d-d transitions are observed in octahedral chromophores. We must turn to another mechanism. Actually this mechanism is operative for all chromophores, whether centrosymmetric or not. As we shall see, however, it is less effective than that described above and so wasn t mentioned there. For centrosymmetric systems it s the only game in town. 

These relations are the same as the parity rules obeyed by the second derivative of the second entropy, Eqs. (94) and (95). This effectively is the nonlinear version of Casimir s [24] generalization to the case of mixed parity of Onsager s reciprocal relation [10] for the linear transport coefficients, Eq. (55). The nonlinear result was also asserted by Grabert et al., (Eq. (2.5) of Ref. 25), following the assertion of Onsager s regression hypothesis with a state-dependent transport matrix. 

Paddon-Row MN, Shephard MJ (1997) Through-bond orbital coupling, the parity rule, and the design of superbridges which exhibit greatly enhanced electronic coupling a natural bond orbital analysis. J Am Chem Soc 119 5355-5365... 

M. N. Paddon-Row, M. J. Shephard, Through-Bond Orbital Coupling, the Parity Rule, and the Design of Superbridges Which Exhibit Greatly Enhanced Electronic Coupling - a Natural Bond Orbital Analysis , J. Am. Chem. Soc 1997,119, 5355-5365. 

However, although f f transitions are, in principle, forbidden by the Laporte parity rule, most of the transitions in (RE) + ions occur at the electric dipole (ED) order. As we have already mentioned, this is an ED allowance due to the admixture of the 4f" states with opposite parity excited states 4f" 5d, as a result of the lack of inversion symmetry (ED forced transitions). The oscillator strength, /, for a / f absorption band can be estimated using expression (5.19). We now rewrite this expression as follows ... 

The fragmentation of these radical cations without any rearrangement or without any cleavage of an even number of bonds such as occurs in rings necessarily leads to an even-electron, or closed shell, ion and to a neutral radical. The parity rules were discussed in Section 6.6. 

McLafferty [9] proposed classifying the reactions of even-electron ions that obey the parity rule (an even ion yields an even ion + neutral fragment) as follows ... 

The reactions considered up to now were limited to those of the McLafferty classification with regard to the parity rule. The reactions of even-electron ions (EE) that do not obey the parity rule are much rarer and more difficult to predict. They are often observed in ions with extended n systems, but they often imply complex rearrangements, as is shown in the case of tropylium ... 

The four-membered cyclic transition state is not allowed by orbital symmetry theory and parity rules. It requires inversion of configuration at the a-carbon and trans addition to the alkene by a conrotatory process, which is sterically impossible [261,263]. The six-membered transition state is allowed by parity rules, but the relative contributions of this pathway and that by unimolecular ionization depends on their relative rate constants and therefore their free energies of activation. Since the transition state of electrophilic addition to alkenes proceeds with a very late transition state requiring an electrophile with a highly developed charge, covalent species are not sufficiently polarized to react directly with alkenes. Thus, the reaction should occur in two steps rather than by a concerted addition [264],... 

An interesting feature of Eq. 101 is a degree of destructive interference arising from the pure 7r-pathway (the exclusive one when all 6>y = 0) being governed by a parity rule. As a result, when the a contributions are suppressed (in the 2" - I pathways in which they would normally participate), the 7)/ magnitude and the P value actually increa.se [70b],... 

Patterns of constructive and destructive interference were obtained from comparisons of Tif values obtained from detailed orbital calculations [60, 63, 70b, 110] and were analyzed in some cases in terms of the simple parity rule (the sign alternation with m of a pathway of the type given in Eq. 86) or suitable generalizations [6, 63]. 

---