Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Colliding particles

The gas has to be dilute because the collision cylinders are assumed not to overlap, and also because collisions between more than two particles are neglected. Also it is assumed that/hardly changes over 8r so that the distribution fimctions for both colliding particles can be taken at the same position r. [Pg.678]

Note that for potentials that depend only on the scalar distance r between the colliding particles, the amplitude y (9) does not depend on the azimuthal angle associated with the direction of observation. [Pg.978]

The identical colliding particles, each with spin s, are in a resolved state with total spinin the range (0 2s). The spatial wavefiinction with respect to particle interchange satisfies = (—1 Wavefunctions for identical particles with even or odd total spin. S are therefore symmetric (S) or antisynnnetric (A) with respect to particle... [Pg.2037]

Ecm energy (of collision) referred to the center of mass of the colliding particles Elab- energy (of collision) referred to a laboratory frame... [Pg.445]

In the coming decades, by colliding particles at ever greater energies, physicists hope to discover what causes mass to exist. [Pg.937]

Second Derivation of the Boltzmann Equation.—The derivation of the Boltzmann equation given in the first sections of this chapter suffers from the obvious defect that it is in no way connected with the fundamental law of statistical mechanics, i.e., LiouviUe s equation. As discussed in Section 12.6of The Mathematics of Physics and Chemistry, 2nd Ed.,22 the behavior of all systems of particles should be compatible with this equation, and, thus, one should be able to derive the Boltzmann equation from it. This has been avoided in the previous derivation by implicitly making statistical assumptions about the behavior of colliding particles that the number of collisions between particles of velocities v1 and v2 is taken proportional to /(v.i)/(v2) implies that there has been no previous relation between the particles (statistical independence) before collision. As noted previously, in a... [Pg.41]

Here p is the radius of the effective cross-section, (v) is the average velocity of colliding particles, and p is their reduced mass. When rotational relaxation of heavy molecules in a solution of light particles is considered, the above criterion is well satisfied. In the opposite case the situation is quite different. Even if the relaxation is induced by collisions of similar particles (as in a one-component system), the fraction of molecules which remain adiabatically isolated from the heat reservoir is fairly large. For such molecules energy relaxation is much slower than that of angular momentum, i.e. xe/xj > 1. [Pg.26]

The elements of S-matrices are determined in the basis of orbital angular momentum l and rotational moments jt,jf of vibrational states i,f and their projections (m,m,-,m/). Both S-matrices in Eq. (4.58) have to be calculated for the same energy Ek of colliding particles. [Pg.147]

To obtain a more detailed idea of the impact operator, it is customary to employ a semiclassical calculation , assuming that the orbital angular momentum of colliding particles may be considered unchanged despite transitions between rotational states. In such a case scattering occurs in a collision plane determined by impact parameter b and initial velocity v. As a result... [Pg.148]

The tilde over operator r here and below indicates that the operator is calculated in the EFA, as was done in [185, 186], This treatment ignores the influence of rotational transitions, caused by the anisotropic part of the interaction, on relative translational motion of colliding particles. Therefore f (.K , differs slightly from the true operator r(K . What... [Pg.148]

In charge exchange collisions the cross-section depends upon the energetics of the reaction. To compute the energy defect, the initial and final states of the colliding particles must be specified. This can be done easily for the bombarded neutral molecule, which usually can be assumed to be in the ground state before the collision, but not for the incident ion which is often in one of its metastable states. [Pg.8]

The selection rules obviously break down if the charge exchange takes place at very small distances between the colliding particles. [Pg.14]

Reactions proceed more quickly at higher temperature A higher fraction of collisions have total energy of colliding particles greater than the activation energy required for reaction. [Pg.13]

It will be assumed for the present considerations that sufficient binder is present in the granulator as determined by the binder/powder ratio and that the binder is appropriately spread on enough granular surfaces so as to ensure that most random collisions between particles will occur on binder-covered areas. It will also be assumed that the particles are more or less spherical having a characteristic dimension, a. The simplified system of two colliding particles is schematically shown in Fig. 21. The thickness of the liquid layer is taken to be h, while the liquid is characterized by its surface tension yand its viscosity /x. The relative velocity U0 is taken to be only the normal component between particles while the tangential component is neglected. [Pg.380]

In studies of steric stabilizers too little attention is generally paid to the dispersion force attractions between particles and the critical separation distance (H ) needed to keep particles from flocculating. Adsorbed steric stabilizers can provide a certain film thickness on each particle but if the separation distance between colliding particles is less than H the particles will flocculate. The calculation of H is not cr difficult and measurements to prove or disprove such calculations are not difficult either. For equal-sized spheres of substance 1 with radius or in medium 2 the Hamaker equation for the dispersion force attractive energy (Uj2i) at close approach is (7) ... [Pg.333]

Combined Electrostatic and Steric Stabilization. The combination of the two mechanisms is illustrated in Figure 4, taken from Shaw s textbook, (13) where the repulsion of the steric barrier during a collision falls off so rapidly as the colliding particles bounce apart that the dispersion force attractions hold the particles together in the "secondary minimum". This is exactly what happens in the system investigated in this paper. [Pg.336]

Such an approach is conceptually different from the continuum description of momentum transport in a fluid in terms of the NS equations. It can be demonstrated, however, that, with a proper choice of the lattice (viz. its symmetry properties), with the collision rules, and with the proper redistribution of particle mass over the (discrete) velocity directions, the NS equations are obeyed at least in the incompressible limit. It is all about translating the above characteristic LB features into the physical concepts momentum, density, and viscosity. The collision rules can be translated into the common variable viscosity, since colliding particles lead to viscous behavior indeed. The reader interested in more details is referred to Succi (2001). [Pg.175]

On the reverse, how does the presence of particles affect local and global flow features in the vessel such as the vortex structure in the vicinity of the impeller, power consumption, circulation and mixing times, and the spatial distribution of turbulence quantities more specifically colliding particles have an impact on the liquid s turbulence (Ten Cate et al., 2004) while local particle concentrations affect the effective (slurry) viscosity which may be useful in the macroflow simulations ... [Pg.193]

In view of secondary nucleation in crystallizers, Ten Cate et al. (2004) were interested in finding out locally about the frequencies of particle collisions in a suspension under the action of the turbulence of the liquid. To this end, they performed a DNS of a particle suspension in a periodic box subject to forced turbulent-flow conditions. In their DNS, the flow field around and between the interacting and colliding particles is fully resolved, while the particles are allowed to rotate in response to the surrounding turbulent-flow field. [Pg.193]

Fig. 12. Snapshot from a two-phase DNS of colliding particles in an originally fully developed turbulent flow of liquid in a periodic 3-D box with spectral forcing of the turbulence. The particles (in blue) have been plotted at their position and are intersected by the plane of view. The arrows denote the instantaneous flow field, the colors relate to the logarithmic value of the nondimensional rate of energy dissipation. Fig. 12. Snapshot from a two-phase DNS of colliding particles in an originally fully developed turbulent flow of liquid in a periodic 3-D box with spectral forcing of the turbulence. The particles (in blue) have been plotted at their position and are intersected by the plane of view. The arrows denote the instantaneous flow field, the colors relate to the logarithmic value of the nondimensional rate of energy dissipation.

See other pages where Colliding particles is mentioned: [Pg.681]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.846]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.129]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.367 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.38 ]




SEARCH



Colliders

Colliding heavy particles

Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator

© 2024 chempedia.info