Angular momentum selection rule

Consider now spin-allowed transitions. The parity and angular momentum selection rules forbid pure d d transitions. Once again the rule is absolute. It is our description of the wavefunctions that is at fault. Suppose we enquire about a d-d transition in a tetrahedral complex. It might be supposed that the parity rule is inoperative here, since the tetrahedron has no centre of inversion to which the d orbitals and the light operator can be symmetry classified. But, this is not at all true for two reasons, one being empirical (which is more of an observation than a reason) and one theoretical. The empirical reason is that if the parity rule were irrelevant, the intensities of d-d bands in tetrahedral molecules could be fully allowed and as strong as those we observe in dyes, for example. In fact, the d-d bands in tetrahedral species are perhaps two or three orders of magnitude weaker than many fully allowed transitions. 

As a result of the atomic nature of the core orbitals, the structure and width of the features in an X-ray emission spectrum reflect the density of states in the valence band from which the transition originates. Also as a result of the atomic nature of the core orbitals, the selection rules governing the X-ray emission are those appropriate to atomic spectroscopy, more especially the orbital angular momentum selection rule A1 = + 1. Thus, transitions to the Is band are only allowed from bands corresponding to the p orbitals. 

Angular momentum selection rule M = 1. Thus transitions that involve a change in angular momentum quantum number by 1 (i.e. p <-> d d <-> f, for instance) are allowed. The important point here is that d-d transitions are not allowed. 

Now, according to the orbital angular momentum selection rules (which determine what transitions the electron is allowed to make), the only electronic transitions that are allowed are those in which either the orbital... 

These angular momentum selection rules figure prominently in the fine structure of alkali atom spectra. The filled-shell core electrons have zero net orbital and spin angular momentum, so the term symbols 2 Si/2,... 

We were able to write the angular momentum selection rules (A/ = + 1, Am = 0, 1) for atoms based on the idea that the photon has one unit of angular momentum. Using the same idea, what are the selection rules on A A in linear molecules... 

In addition, a laser system must use "natural" reaaants, i.e., the elegant and sophisticated reactant state selection preparation techniques discussed elsewhere in this volume do not offer practical solutions to product state selection. For a practical laser device, one must identify and utilize reaction schemes that yield electronically excited products. One is fac with the seemingly impossible task of testing an astronomically large number of possible reaction schemes. A useful starting point is to invoke spin and angular momentum selection rules that are constrained by the symmetry properties of the reactants and products. 

The electric field of laser light need not oscillate in a single plane, and often optics are employed to produce other polarizations with a degree of circularity. Circular polarizations are important in forms of laser spectroscopy which exploit angular momentum selection rules, because the photons carry unit quanta of angular momentum. With chiral substances, a small degree of sensitivity to the handedness of the radiation is also manifest in the circular differential response. For two-photon and higher-order processes, however, even the spectra of reasonably symmetrical molecules display a marked dependence on polarization. 

---