Level, ANOVA

Intensity of a mineral divided by the intensity of the 100 quartz peak (d = 0.426 nm).In a given column, mean values (sd = standard deviation) for the six horizons followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the a < 0.10 probability level (ANOVA). Adapted from Courchesne and Gobran (1997). 

The fitness of each genotype is plotted relative to the most fit which is given a value of 1.0. An asterisk indicates significant differences at the 5% level (ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc pairwise comparisons) and individual P values are given above each histogram. 

This value of fexp is compared with the critical value for f(a, v), where the significance level is the same as that used in the ANOVA calculation, and the degrees of freedom is the same as that for the within-sample variance. Because we are interested in whether the larger of the two means is significantly greater than the other mean, the value of f(a, v) is that for a one-tail significance test. 

FIGURE 11.3 One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance). One-way analysis of variance of basal rates of metabolism in melanophores (as measured by spontaneous dispersion of pigment due to G,.-protein activation) for four experiments. Cells were transiently transfected with cDNA for human calcitonin receptor (8 j-ig/ml) on four separate occasions to induce constitutive receptor activity. The means of the four basal readings for the cells for each experiment (see Table 11.4) are shown in the histogram (with standard errors). The one-way analysis of variance is used to determine whether there is a significant effect of test occasion (any one of the four experiments is different with respect to level of constitutive activity). 

A two level full factorial experimental design with three variables, F/P molar ratio, OH/P wt %, and reaction temperature was implemented to analyses the effect of variables on the synthesis reaction of PF resol resin. Based on the composition of 16 components of 10 samples, the effect of three independent variables on the chemical structure was anal3 ed by using 3 way ANOVA of SPSS. The present study provides that experimental design is a very valuable and capable tool for evaluating multiple variables in resin production. 

KEY ND=levels below the sensitivity of the assay. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA... 

METH-induced changes in neuropeptide levels, selective Dj (SCH 23390) and D2 (sulpiride) dopaminergic receptor antagonists were coadministered. The results are expressed as percent of control to facilitate comparisons each value represents the mean SEM of five to seven animals. Data were subjeeted to either a Student s r-test (figures 4 and 5) or ANOVA analysis followed by a multiple comparisons test (figures 1, 2, and 3). Signifieanee was set at the. 05 level. 

Table 5.3. Evaluation scheme of two-way ANOVA (ab model single measurements in each point the index point marks that levels over which is actually added up or averaged, respectively)...

If possible, two-way ANOVA should be applied doing repetitions at each level. In case of double measurements the 2ab model represented in Tables 5.5 and 5.6 is taken as the basis of evaluation and variance decomposition. 

In the case that interactions prove to be insignificant, it should be gone over to the ab model the estimations of which for the various variance components is more reliable than that of the 2ab model. A similar scheme can be used for three-way ANOVA when the factor c is varied at two levels. In the general, three-way analysis bases on block-designed experiments as shown in Fig. 5.1. 

Table 35-3 illustrates the ANOVA results comparing laboratories (i.e., different locations) performing the same METHOD A for analysis. This statistical test indicates that for the mid-level concentration spiked samples (i.e. 4 and 4 at 3.40 and 3.61% levels, respectively) difference in reported average values occurred. However, this trend did not continue for the highest concentration sample (i.e., Sample No. 6) with a concentration of 3.80%. The Lab 1 was slightly lower in reported value for Samples 4 and 5. There is no significant systematic error observed between laboratories using the METHOD A. 

ANOVA in these chapters also, back when it was still called Statistics in Spectroscopy [16-19] although, to be sure, our discussions were at a fairly elementary level. The experiment that Philip Brown did is eminently suitable for that type of computation. The experiment was formally a three-factor multilevel full-factorial design. Any nonlinearity in the data will show up in the analysis as what Statisticians call an interaction term, which can even be tested for statistical significance. He then used the wavelengths of maximum linearity to perform calibrations for the various sugars. We will discuss the results below, since they are at the heart of what makes this paper important. 

There are various other ways of examining the variate in question in this case. Let us first examine simple one-way ANOVA of the variate by sex as in Table 16.16. In neither of the two cases was there any indication of significant treatment differences at any reasonable level. Because the two sexes did not show any pretreatment differences based on the two-factor analysis of the covariate, let us combine the two sexes and analyze the data by one-way ANOVA as in Table 16.17. In this case, because of the increased sample sizes for combining the two sexes, there was indication of some treatment differences (p = 0.0454). Unfortunately, this analysis assumes that because there were no pretreatment differences between the two sexes, that pattern will hold during the posttreatment period. That often may not be the case because of biological reasons. 

If ANOVA reveals no significance it is not appropriate to proceed to perform a post hoc test in hope of finding differences. To do so would only be another form of multiple comparisons, increasing the type I error rate beyond the desired level. 

Note also that we can use the correlation test statistic (described in the correlation coefficient section) to determine if the regression is significant (and, therefore, valid at a defined level of certainty. A more specific test for significance would be the linear regression analysis of variance (Pollard, 1977). To so we start by developing the appropriate ANOVA table. 

Leaves were dark-adapted therefore, there is no detectable level of zeaxanthin. Concentrations are nmol pigment (mol chi a — b), the P value from one factor ANOVA is displayed below each column. V-A-Z = xanthophyll pool (violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, zeaxanthin) EPS = epoxidation state. Reprinted with permission from P. J. Ralph et al. [76]. 

It was decided to fit the model expressed by Equation 10.6 to the most recent 100 data points only (i.e., starting with sequence number 72) and then use the earlier data points to test the predictive capability of the fitted model (although the prediction is backward in time see Section 3.5 and Exercise 4.19). Table 10.2 lists the parameter estimates and levels of confidence. Table 10.3 gives the ANOVA table and other statistics for the fitted model. 

This is easier for true solutions, because they are homogeneous at a molecular level. For solid samples this is more difficult and special methods must be applied to ensure homogeneity. A procedure using ANOVA techniques for the check for homogeneity is described in the International Harmonized Protocol. 

This link applies also to the p-value from the unpaired t-test and the confidence interval for p, the mean difference between the treatments, and in addition extends to adjusted analyses including ANOVA and ANCOVA and similarly for regression. For example, if the test for the slope b of the regression line gives a significant p-value (at the 5 per cent level) then the 95 per cent confidence interval for the slope will not contain zero and vice versa. 

---