Major hazards legislation

In the United Kingdom, the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) and regulations made under it require occupiers to provide a safe plant and system of work and adequate instruction, training, and supervision. In the European community, occupiers of major hazard sites are required to produce a safety case, which describes how hazards have been assessed and are kept under control. Many other countries have similar legislation, though standards of enforcement vary. 

Next to the legislation on OELs and BATs, the requirements of the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances apply as well as various other regulations at national level dealing with flammable liquids, water pollution, air pollution,major hazards,storage and transport, protective equipment and ventilation. 

National Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and supporting regulations. A combination of legislation applicable to all industries with additional specific major hazard regulations for the offshore oil and gas industry. Nonmajor hazard legislation is applied offshore on an activity basis. 

Offshore-specific legislation applies to Offshore Installations as defined in the regulations. These include fixed and floating production installations, plus non-production installations such as MODUs, FSUs, Hotels and others, according to their exposure to major hazard risks. In total, there are approximately 290 surface installations and another approximately 25 mobile drilling rigs in the UK sector on an annual basis. 

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) was the first major federal legislation on hazardous waste. It has imdergone several updates since its beginning. In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has created numerous regulations intended to implement RCRA and its focus on hazardous waste. 

Previous models of spillage and dispersion behavior described the releases of these substances in an unrealistic way. The new model ASTO described in Section 37.6 is much more realistic and is suitable for use by industry and enforcing authorities in fulfilling the requirements of international legislation on major hazards risk assessment. The following are the main advantages of the new model. 

Regulations such as the UK Control of Major Accident Hazard (COMAH) regulations mandate that for major hazard facilities the public must be informed of the risks in advance. US right to know legislation, for example, does a similar thing. 

Leadership and coardinatirm, nonetheless, are crucial to ensuring that the needs of affected commuiuties and the services they depend upon are met in as timely, effective and equitable manner as possible. Key to effective emergency leadership and coordination is legislation that adequately provides for the situations that are likely to arise from major hazards. 

The legislative requirement to identify the major hazards and risks that respective national. 

In the United States, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) is the major legislation covering the disposal of solid and hazardous wastes (2). This act provides a multifaceted approach to solving the problems associated with the generation of approximately 5 billion metric tons of solid waste each year in the United States. It places particular emphasis on the regulation of hazardous wastes. This law established the Office of Solid Waste within the Environmental Protection Agency and directed the agency to publish hazardous waste characteristics and criteria. 

In fact, regulatory drivers are often seen as instrumental in spurring innovation. An assessment by a major aerospace manufacturer of what drives innovation towards safer processes for hazardous waste streams revealed that The regulatory drivers for waste reduction are familiar to most by now, and may be summarised into three categories of legislation 1) inventory reporting, 2) emission reporting, and 3) employee exposure levels. Anticipation of future restrictions was a decisive factor in this project. ... 

---