Lead, chemisorption

Surface heterogeneity may merely be a reflection of different types of chemisorption and chemisorption sites, as in the examples of Figs. XVIII-9 and XVIII-10. The presence of various crystal planes, as in powders, leads to heterogeneous adsorption behavior the effect may vary with particle size, as in the case of O2 on Pd [107]. Heterogeneity may be deliberate many catalysts consist of combinations of active surfaces, such as bimetallic alloys. In this last case, the surface properties may be intermediate between those of the pure metals (but one component may be in surface excess as with any solution) or they may be distinctly different. In this last case, one speaks of various effects ensemble, dilution, ligand, and kinetic (see Ref. 108 for details). 

The chemisorption of a molecule is often a precursor [31] to fiirther reactions such as dissociation (see section A3,9.5.2). that is, the molecule must reside in the precursor state exploring many configurations until finding that leading to a reaction. Where there is more than one distinct chemisorption state, one can act as a precursor to the other [32], The physisorption state can also act as a precursor to chemisorption, as is observed for the 02/Ag(l 10) system [33],... 

Strong adsorbate-substrate forces lead to chemisorption, in which a chemical bond is fomied. By contrast, weak forces result inphysisorption, as one calls non-chemical physical adsorption. 

Flead and Silva used occupation numbers obtained from a periodic FIF density matrix for the substrate to define localized orbitals in the chemisorption region, which then defines a cluster subspace on which to carry out FIF calculations [181]. Contributions from the surroundings also only come from the bare slab, as in the Green s matrix approach. Increases in computational power and improvements in minimization teclmiques have made it easier to obtain the electronic properties of adsorbates by supercell slab teclmiques, leading to the Green s fiinction methods becommg less popular [182]. 

The hydrophobic character exhibited by dehydroxylated silica is not shared by the metal oxides on which detailed adsorption studies have been made, in particular the oxides of Al, Cr, Fe, Mg, Ti and Zn. With these oxides, the progressive removal of chemisorbed water leads to an increase, rather than a decrease, in the affinity for water. In recent years much attention has been devoted, notably by use of spectroscopic and adsorption techniques, to the elucidation of the mechanism of the physisorption and chemisorption of water by those oxides the following brief account brings out some of the salient features. 

Chemical Bond Formation (Chemisorption). This is the mechanism that leads to the formation of the strongest bonds between coUectors and mineral surfaces. Chemically adsorbed reagents usuaUy form surface compounds at the active waU sites. The flotation of calcite (CaCO ) and... 

This type of isotherm is more realistic for describing chemisorption at intermediate 0a values but quickly leads to mathematically cumbersome or intractable expressions with many unknown parameters when one considers coadsorption of two gases. One needs to know how -AHa is affected both by 0A and by the coverages of all other adsorbates. Thus for all practical purposes the LHHW kinetics represent even today the only viable approach for formulating mathematically tractable, albeit usually highly inaccurate, rate expressions for catalytic kinetics. In Chapter 6 we will see a new, medium field type, approach which generalizes the LHHW kinetics by accounting also for lateral interactions. 

Increasing catalyst potential and work function leads to a pronounced increase in total oxygen coverage (which approaches unity even at elevated temperatures) and causes the appearance of new chemisorption states. At least two such states are created on Pt/YSZ (Fig. 4.43) A strongly bonded one which, as discussed in Chapter 5, acts as a sacrificial promoter during catalytic oxidations, and a weakly bonded one which is highly reactive and causes the observed dramatic increase in catalytic rate. 

Positive potentials lead to p values up to 20. (Figure 4.52). Negative currents also enhance the rate and selectivity but to a lesser extent (Fig. 8.64). Permanent NEMCA behaviour is also observed with positive currents at lower temperatures (Fig. 4.52). Overall, however, electrochemical promotion is not as pronounced as in the case where propene is used. This can be attributed to the much stronger electron donor character of C3H6 relative to CO which, as already noted in this chapter, behaves predominantly as an electron acceptor. Thus positive potentials weaken CO bonding to the surface while they enhance CjH6 chemisorption. 

Many molecules undergo partial oxidation on adsorption and many alkanes and alkenes are believed to yield an adsorbed CHO group on adsorption (Petrii, 1968). These processes usually lead to the complete oxidation of the organic molecule to carbon dioxide and few workers have attempted to halt the reaction at an intermediate stage. Hence, although there are undoubtedly possibilities for using dissociative chemisorption for synthetic reactions, this chapter will not consider these processes further. 

Physisorption, originating from Van der Waals interaction between reactant and surface. This weakly exothermic process is reversible and does not result in any new chemical bonds being formed. In general physisorption does not lead to catalytic activity but may be a precursor to chemisorption. 

The strain or stress will either lead to narrower or broader d bands that are shifted up or down in energy, respectively. An upward shift leads to a stronger interaction with the 2jt orbital of adsorbed CO and thus to a stronger chemisorption bond. Stress has the opposite effect. 

If we restrict ourselves to the late transition metals the trends will, as for the CO chemisorption energy, be dominated by the interaction of the antibonding orbital with the d band and the leading term is... 

Here we shall be concerned with the interaction of inacming diatomic molecules (H-/ 0.) with either types of potential energy wells The molecular InteractJjon (responsible for elastic and direct-inelastic scattering with extremely short residence times of the irpinglng molecules in the potential) and the chemisorptive interaction (leading to dissociative adsorption and associative desorption, reflectively, and associated with H (D) atoms trapped in the chemisorption potential for an appreci le time). 

The results of the EXAFS studies on osmium-copper clusters lead to conclusions similar to those derived for ruthenium-copper clusters. That is, an osmium-copper cluster Is viewed as a central core of osmium atoms with the copper present at the surface. The results of the EXAFS investigations have provided excellent support for the conclusions deduced earlier (21,23,24) from studies of the chemisorption and catalytic properties of the clusters. Although copper is immiscible with both ruthenium and osmium in the bulk, it exhibits significant interaction with either metal at an interface. 

Note that the particle shape is affected by the interaction between the active phase and the support and by the surface free energy. The former tends to lead to spreading of a particle, whereas the latter tends to form spherical particles (Scholten et al., 1985). When particles are partially poisoned (Fig. 3.48.b), chemisorption data can be interpreted wrongly the average particle size is overestimated. The same applies to particles encapsulated in the support. 

Thus, sensor effect deals with the change of various electrophysical characteristics of semiconductor adsorbent when detected particles occur on its surface irrespective of the mechanism of their creation. This happens because the surface chemical compounds obtained as a result of chemisorption are substantially stable and capable on numerous occasions of exchanging charge with the volume bands of adsorbent or directly interact with electrically active defects of a semiconductor, which leads to direct change in concentration of free carriers and, in several cases, the charge state of the surface. 

Usually adsorption, i.e. binding of foreign particles to the surface of a solid body, is distinguished as physical and chemical the difference lying in the type of adsorbate - adsorbent interaction. Physical adsorption is assumed to be a surface binding caused by polarization dipole-dipole Van-der-Vaals interaction whereas chemical adsorption, as any chemical interaction, stems from covalent forces with plausible involvement of electrostatic interaction. In contrast to chemisorption in which, as it has been already mentioned, an absorbed particle and adsorbent itself become a unified quantum mechanical system, the physical absorption only leads to a weak perturbation of the lattice of a solid body. 

Distinguishing between physical and chemical adsorption using the value of adsorption heat cannot lead to unambiguous results, too. An arbitrary classification of physical adsorption as having small heats Q - 0.01 + 0.2 eV typical for and attributing - 1 eV to diemisorption is often violated. A typical example can be provided by a dissipative chemisorption diaracterized by small total heat effect. 

---