Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Labels comparison

Environmental assessment or request for categorical exclusion Statements of claimed exclusivity and associated certifications b Prescribing information 0. Annotated labeling text d. Labeling comparison (for ANDA)... [Pg.114]

Analyze the cleaved proteins by SDS gel electrophoresis and Western blotting, followed by specific detection of the prey protein label. Comparison of prey protein fragments formed by chemical and enzymatic digestion can yield information as to the site of the resultant FeBABE-mediated cleavage. [Pg.1036]

Strober, M., DeAntonio, M., Schmidt-Lackner, S., Pataki, C., Freeman, R., Rigali, J., and Rao, U. (1999) The pharmacotherapy of depressive illness in adolescents an open-label comparison of fluoxetine with imipramine-treated historical controls. / Clin Psychiatry 60 164-169. [Pg.483]

Moyle GJ, Baldwin C, Langroudi B, Mandalia S, Gazzard BG. A 48-week, randomized, open-label comparison of three abacavir-based substitution approaches in the management of dyslipidemia and peripheral lipoatrophy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003 33 22-8. [Pg.662]

Analysis approach - corn and sorghum A two-tiered approach was also used to characterize the benefits associated with uses of atrazine and simazine in corn and sorghum. First, a comparative analysis was made of product labels. The following parameters were considered in this review performance profiles, including efficacy, spectrum, and crop tolerance label comparisons physical and chemical characteristics of the product hazard profiles economic benefits and other relevant issues, such as use restrictions, etc. [Pg.167]

Draft Labeling (Multiple Copies N/A for E-Submissions) 1.14.1.1 4 copies of draft (each strength and container) 1.14.1.2 1 side-by-side labeling comparison of containers and carton with all differences annotated and explained 1.14.1.3 1 package insert (content of labeling) submitted electronically Was a proprietary name request submitted 2... [Pg.270]

Profile Analysis of Oligosaccharides from Glycoproteins by PMP Labeling. Comparison of Chemical and Enzymatic Release Methods Using RP-HPLC and Mass Spectrometry... [Pg.321]

Khurana, C. M. (1996). A multicenter, randomized, open label comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media among children attending day care or school. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 15, S24-S29. [Pg.393]

In an open-label comparison of exenatide with insulin glargine in diabetic patients suboptimally controlled with metformin and sulfonylurea, both treatment regimens led to a reduction in HbA levels by -1.1% after 26 weeks (baseline 8.2%)... [Pg.117]

Henry DH, Gordan LN, Charu V, et al. Randomized, open-label comparison of epoetin aha extended dosing (80 000 U Q2W) vs weekly dosing (40 000 U QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. Curr Med Res Opin 2006 22 1403-1413. [Pg.154]

In a 4-week, randomised, open-label comparison of ziprasidone and clozapine in the treatment of psychotic symptoms in Parkinson s disease, the most common initial adverse effect was somnolence [47 ]. There was no difference in movement disorder scales between the two antipsychotics. [Pg.62]

Crespo-Facorro B, P4rez-Iglesias R, Mata 1, Ortiz-Garcia de la Foz V, Martinez-Garcia O, Valdizan EM, et al. Aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first-episode nonaffective psychosis results of a 6-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label comparison. J CHn Psychopharmacol 2013 33(2) 215-20. [Pg.76]

A comparison of the results achieved with the FEM Analysis and the rosetta strain gauge measurements is shown in fig. 19. Differences can be noted in areas labeled B and C. The former can be explained as an effect of the discrepancy between the actual shape of the vessel and the ideal one used in the F.E.M. model. The latter can be ascribed to the presence of a muff, located in the centre of the head of the actual vessel, which has not been taken into account in the model. [Pg.413]

Figure Bl.15.14. Comparison of 95.1 GHz (A) and 9.71 GHz (B) EPR spectra for a frozen solution of a nitroxide spin label attached to insulin measured at 170 K. Figure Bl.15.14. Comparison of 95.1 GHz (A) and 9.71 GHz (B) EPR spectra for a frozen solution of a nitroxide spin label attached to insulin measured at 170 K.
Plot E versus log t for both of these sets of data on the same graph. Now suppose that the units of the 45°C experiment are minutes instead of seconds (this is not the case, but we can pretend that it is). On the basis of this imaginary condition, each of the times at 45°C should be multiplied by the factor 60 sec/min to make the comparison with the 25°C data. Apply this correction to the 45°C data and plot on the original graph. Be sure to select a scale of the original graph so that corrected data can be accommodated also, label various portions clearly. Briefly comment on the results of this manipulation. [Pg.195]

Figure 8.29 shows two of the more common processes involved in XRF. Comparison with Figure 8.23 illustrating an Auger electron process shows that the same system for labelling energy levels is used in AES and XRF. [Pg.324]

Fig. 12. Comparison of actual and predicted charging rates for 0.3-pm particles in a corona field of 2.65 kV/cm (141). The finite approximation theory (173) which gives the closest approach to experimental data takes into account both field charging and diffusion charging mechanisms. The curve labeled White (141) predicts charging rate based only on field charging and that marked Arendt and Kallmann (174) shows charging rate based only on diffusion. Fig. 12. Comparison of actual and predicted charging rates for 0.3-pm particles in a corona field of 2.65 kV/cm (141). The finite approximation theory (173) which gives the closest approach to experimental data takes into account both field charging and diffusion charging mechanisms. The curve labeled White (141) predicts charging rate based only on field charging and that marked Arendt and Kallmann (174) shows charging rate based only on diffusion.
Many labeling systems have been used for dalbaheptide stmctures. The one used herein, where each of the seven amino acids is identified by a number (see Table 2) and each atom by a letter, is widely appHed because it permits easy comparison of and nmr data (31). The lUPAC system, utilised in Chemicaly hstracts and generally in the description of semisynthetic derivatives, requires decodification for comparison of different dalbaheptides (83). [Pg.535]

Benzoates. The selective debenzoylation of sucrose octabenzoate [2425-84-5] using isopropylamine in the absence of solvents caused deacylation in the furanose ring to give 2,3,4,6,1/3/6 -hepta- and 2,3,4,6,1/6 -hexa-O-benzoyl-sucroses in 24.1 and 25.4% after 21 and 80 hours, respectively (54). The unambiguous assignment of partially benzoylated sucrose derivatives was accompHshed by specific isotopic labeling techniques (54). Identification of any benzoylated sucrose derivative can thus be achieved by comparison of its C-nmr carbonyl carbon resonances with those of the assigned octabenzoate derivative after benzoylation with 10 atom % benzoyl—carbonyl chloride in pyridine. [Pg.33]

The two most important pieces of chemical control legislation enacted affecting the dye and pigment industries are the United States Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) and EEC s Classification, Packaging, and Labeling of Dangerous Substances and its amendments. Table 2 is a comparison of TSCA and the 6th Amendment of the EEC classifications. [Pg.387]

The occurrence of syn elimination in 5-decyl systems has been demonstrated with the use of diastereomeric deuterium-labeled substrates. Stereospecifically labeled 5-substituted decane derivatives were prepared and subjected to appropriate elimination conditions. By comparison of the amount of deuterium in the E and Z isomers of the product, it was... [Pg.388]

Since variations in process variables, such as load, have a direct effect on the vibration energy and signature generated by a machine-train, the actual operating envelope for each baseline data set must also be clearly identified. If this step is omitted, direct comparison of other data to the baseline will be meaningless. The label feature in most vibration monitoring systems permits tagging the baseline data set with this additional information. [Pg.730]


See other pages where Labels comparison is mentioned: [Pg.373]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.1399]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.1399]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1496]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.41]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.271 ]




SEARCH



Metabolic labeling comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info