Kohn expression

The Kohn variational principle (Kohn, 1948) can be formulated in a number of closely related ways (e.g., Nesbet, 1980 Rudge, 1990). Their common feature is that the variational expression involves the Hamiltonian operator H together with an operator describing the scattering either the so-called T operator that is most closely connected to the scattering amplitude or the related reactance (K) or scattering (S) operators. The Kohn expression is so contrived that the portion of the expression that depends on H—a matrix element between two approximate wavefunctions—approaches zero quadratically as those wavefunctions approach... 

Obviously, such an approach is of little interest if it can only be employed in one dimension. The corresponding analysis has been worked out, however, for full three-dimensional atom-diatom collisions, both for inelastic and reactive systems " and applied to a variety of systems using both the TDW and TIW forms of wave packet methodology. The most useful expressions are those resulting from combining the Kohn variational principle with the TDW or TIW formalisms. The simplest version of these, in our opinion, is the TIW-5-matrix Kohn expression, having the structure... 

In a number of classic papers Hohenberg, Kohn and Sham established a theoretical framework for justifying the replacement of die many-body wavefiinction by one-electron orbitals [15, 20, 21]. In particular, they proposed that die charge density plays a central role in describing the electronic stnicture of matter. A key aspect of their work was the local density approximation (LDA). Within this approximation, one can express the exchange energy as... 

A completely difierent approach to scattering involves writing down an expression that can be used to obtain S directly from the wavefunction, and which is stationary with respect to small errors in die waveftmction. In this case one can obtain the scattering matrix element by variational theory. A recent review of this topic has been given by Miller [32]. There are many different expressions that give S as a ftmctional of the wavefunction and, therefore, there are many different variational theories. This section describes the Kohn variational theory, which has proven particularly useftil in many applications in chemical reaction dynamics. To keep the derivation as simple as possible, we restrict our consideration to potentials of die type plotted in figure A3.11.1(c) where the waveftmcfton vanishes in the limit of v -oo, and where the Smatrix is a scalar property so we can drop the matrix notation. 

By introducing this expression for the electron density and applying the appropriate variational condition the following one-electron Kohn-Sham equations result ... 

To solve the Kohn-Sham equations a number of different approaches and strategies have been proposed. One important way in which these can differ is in the choice of basis set for expanding the Kohn-Sham orbitals. In most (but not all) DPT programs for calculating the properties of molecular systems (rather than for solid-state materials) the Kohn-Sham orbitals are expressed as a linear combination of atomic-centred basis functions ... 

The application of density functional theory to isolated, organic molecules is still in relative infancy compared with the use of Hartree-Fock methods. There continues to be a steady stream of publications designed to assess the performance of the various approaches to DFT. As we have discussed there is a plethora of ways in which density functional theory can be implemented with different functional forms for the basis set (Gaussians, Slater type orbitals, or numerical), different expressions for the exchange and correlation contributions within the local density approximation, different expressions for the gradient corrections and different ways to solve the Kohn-Sham equations to achieve self-consistency. This contrasts with the situation for Hartree-Fock calculations, wlrich mostly use one of a series of tried and tested Gaussian basis sets and where there is a substantial body of literature to help choose the most appropriate method for incorporating post-Hartree-Fock methods, should that be desired. 

In this formulation, the electron density is expressed as a linear combination of basis functions similar in mathematical form to HF orbitals. A determinant is then formed from these functions, called Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is the electron density from this determinant of orbitals that is used to compute the energy. This procedure is necessary because Fermion systems can only have electron densities that arise from an antisymmetric wave function. There has been some debate over the interpretation of Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is certain that they are not mathematically equivalent to either HF orbitals or natural orbitals from correlated calculations. However, Kohn-Sham orbitals do describe the behavior of electrons in a molecule, just as the other orbitals mentioned do. DFT orbital eigenvalues do not match the energies obtained from photoelectron spectroscopy experiments as well as HF orbital energies do. The questions still being debated are how to assign similarities and how to physically interpret the differences. 

In Part 2 of their paper, Hohenberg and Kohn go on to investigate the form of the functional F[P(r)] in the special cases of certain limiting charge densities. They find that F[P(r)] can be expressed in terms of the correlation energy and electric polarizabilities. 

Implementation of the Kohn-Sham-LCAO procedure is quite simple we replace the standard exchange term in the HF-LCAO expression by an appropriate Vxc that will depend on the local electron density and perhaps also its gradient. The new integrals involved contain fractional powers of the electron density and cannot be evaluated analytically. There are various ways forward, all of which... 

RRE decoy CD34+ bone marrow cells Traps Rev and thus inhibits transactivation of HIV-1 gene expression Kohn et al. 1999... 

To understand how Kohn and Sham tackled this problem, we go back to the discussion of the Hartree-Fock scheme in Chapter 1. There, our wave function was a single Slater determinant SD constructed from N spin orbitals. While the Slater determinant enters the HF method as the approximation to the true N-electron wave function, we showed in Section 1.3 that 4>sd can also be looked upon as the exact wave function of a fictitious system of N non-interacting electrons (that is electrons which behave as uncharged fermions and therefore do not interact with each other via Coulomb repulsion), moving in the elfective potential VHF. For this type of wave function the kinetic energy can be exactly expressed as... 

Thus, once we know the various contributions in equation (5-15) we have a grip on the potential Vs which we need to insert into the one-particle equations, which in turn determine the orbitals and hence the ground state density and the ground state energy by employing the energy expression (5-13). It should be noted that Veff already depends on the density (and thus on the orbitals) through the Coulomb term as shown in equation (5-13). Therefore, just like the Hartree-Fock equations (1-24), the Kohn-Sham one-electron equations (5-14) also have to be solved iteratively. 

Here (Oj is the excitation energy ErE0 and the sum runs over all excited states I of the system. From equation (5-37) we immediately see that the dynamic mean polarizability a(co) diverges for tOj=co, i. e has poles at the electronic excitation energies 0)j. The residues fj are the corresponding oscillator strengths. Translated into the Kohn-Sham scheme, the exact linear response can be expressed as the linear density response of a non-interacting... 

Note again the formal simplicity of equation (7-17) as compared to equation (7-18) in spite of the fact that the former is exact provided the correct Vxc is inserted, while the latter is inherently an approximation. The calculation of the formally L2/2 one-electron integrals contained in hllv, equation (7-13) is a fairly simple task compared to the determination of the classical Coulomb and the exchange-correlation contributions. However, before we turn to the question, how to deal with the Coulomb and Vxc integrals, we want to discuss what kind of basis functions are nowadays used in equation (7-4) to express the Kohn-Sham orbitals. 

This step is similar to what we have done in equation (7-7) where we obtained the matrix representation of the Kohn-Sham operator. If we insert expression (7-14) for the charge density in terms of the LCAO functions and make use of the density matrix P defined in equation (7-15), we arrive at... 

P14. Pohl, W., Kindas-Mugge, J., Kohn, H., Fitzal, S Micksche, M., and Kummer, F., Elevated heat shock protein 72 expression by human alveolar macrophages during the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 147, A70(Abst) (1993). 

---