Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Kinetic Parameters - Mechanism Construction

To apply the results of the chemical activation and the thermal dissociation analysis for comparison to literature or experimental data (when available) it is necessary to construct an elementary chemical reaction mechanism. The mechanism includes all the reactions involved in the chemical activation process, including stabilizations and reactions for thermal dissociation of the stabilized species. The reactions are reversible, so that we implicitly take into account some of the thermal dissociation reactions as the reverse of the forwards (chemically activated) reactions. For example, the dissociation of DBFOO to DBF + O2 is included as being the reverse reaction of DBF + O2 o DBFOO. ThermKin is used to determine the elementary reaction rate coefficients and express the rate coefficients in Arrhenius forms. [Pg.144]

The kinetic parameters of the reactions describing the DBF + O2 reaction system of the current study are determined with the following methods  [Pg.144]

Which energy barrier can be easily calculated using high level calculation methods like G3 (see Table 7.3). With the ThermKin code and the G3 calculations, the energy barrier Bi for the forward reaction CH2 0CH=0 — CH2=0 + CH =0 is calculated to be 31.68 kcal mof. The backward reaction B.i can be then estimated as follows  [Pg.145]

The kinetic parameters for the reactions contained in the pathways given above (Path 1, Path 2 and Path 3), in the form of modified Arrhenius rate, are given in Table 7.8. In the preceding text, we reported the approach we used to calculate the kinetic parameters for the dibenzofurany + O2 system. To test again the appropriateness of the kinetic analysis methods used, we calculated small transition state structures and compared them to the literature data. These calculations allowed us to satisfactory reproduce a range of experimental data on the overall rate. [Pg.145]

UV Derived from phenyl system Y(C6J0)D0 0DC6JD0 Ea = 26.20 1.5182E+11 0.516 19.22 11.36 [Pg.148]


Once the kinetic parameters of elementary steps, as well as thermodynamic quantities such as heats of adsorption (Chapter 6), are available one can construct a micro-kinetic model to describe the overall reaction. Otherwise, one has to rely on fitting a rate expression that is based on an assumed reaction mechanism. Examples of both cases are discussed this chapter. [Pg.267]

The versatility of IR spectroscopic methods as applied to kinetic and mechanistic studies has been evident from studies of slow decomp of some model expl compds (Ref 34). Quantitative data from IR spectrograms of the N-aryl-N -tosyloxydi-imide N-oxide system thermal decompn have been used to construct decompn versus time curves. These data have been used to compute kinetic parameters, activation energies and to formulate a consistent mechanism for the process... [Pg.422]

The construction of a comprehensive kinetic model to represent the oxidation of a hydrocarbon, incorporating the best available kinetic parameters, permits a quantitative link to be forged by numerical computation between detailed chemical measurements and the interpretation of the underlying kinetics and mechanism of the combustion system. The first step is the simulation of composition-time profiles for intermediate and final products under conditions resembling the experimental study, as a validation of the model itself. Further insight may then be gained into the... [Pg.629]

Chapter 6 presents estimations of thermochemical properties of intermediates, transition states and products important to destruction of the aromatic ring in the phenyl radical + O2 reaction system. We have employed both DFT and high-level ab initio methods to analyze the substituent effects on a number of chemical reactions and processes involving alkyl and peroxyl radicals. Partially based on the results obtained in the vinyl system, high-pressure-limit kinetic parameters are obtained using canonical Transition State Theory. An elementary reaction mechanism is constructed to model experimental data obtained in a combustor at 1 atm, and in high-pressure turbine systems (5-20 atm), as well as in supercritical water [31]. [Pg.5]

In general, a mechanism for any complex reaction (catalytic or non-catalytic) is defined as a sequence of elementary steps involved in the overall transformation. To determine these steps and especially to find their kinetic parameters is very rare if at all possible. It requires sophisticated spectroscopic methods and/or computational tools. Therefore, a common way to construct a microkinetic model describing the overall transformation rate is to assume a simplified reaction mechanism that is based on experimental findings. Once the model is chosen, a rate expression can be obtained and fitted to the kinetics observed. [Pg.53]

A CCA is intended to work in conjunction with a PBPK as a tool to test and refine mechanistic hypotheses. A molecular model can be embedded in a tissue model which is embedded in the PBPK. Thus, the molecular model is related to the overall metabohc response. The PBPK can be made an exact replica of the CCA the predicted response and measured CCA, response should exactly match if the PBPK contains a complete and accurate description of the molecular mechanisms. In the CCA, aU flow rates, the number of cells in each compartment, and the levels of each enzyme can be measured independently, so no adjustable parameters are required. If the PBPK predictions and CCA results disagree, then the description of the molecular mechanisms is incomplete. The CCA and PBPK can be used in an iterative manner to test modifications in the proposed mechanism. When the PBPK is extended to describe the whole animal, failure to predict animal response would be due to inaccurate description of transport (particularly withiu an organ), inability to accurately measure kinetic parameters (e.g., in vivo enzyme levels or activities), or the presence in vivo or metabohc activities not present in the cultured cells or tissues. Advances in tissue engineering wiU provide tissue constructs to use in a CCA that will display more authentic metaboHsm than isolated cell cultures. [Pg.130]

The first notion on the deviation of elementary catalytic acts of enzyme reaction, from that prescribed by classical thermodynamic and kinetic approaches, was, probably, formulated in 1971 [19]. It had been shown that the application of basic postulates of activated state theory to the majority of enzyme processes can lead to physically meaningless values of the activation parameters (energy and entropy of activation). It was emphasized that enzyme functioning is more similar to the work of a mechanical construction than to the catalytic homogeneous chemical reaction. The selfconsistent phenomenological relaxation theory of enzyme catalysis was proposed in 1972 [20, 21]. [Pg.95]

Edmond Becquerel (1820-1891) was the nineteenth-century scientist who studied the phosphorescence phenomenon most intensely. Continuing Stokes s research, he determined the excitation and emission spectra of diverse phosphors, determined the influence of temperature and other parameters, and measured the time between excitation and emission of phosphorescence and the duration time of this same phenomenon. For this purpose he constructed in 1858 the first phosphoroscope, with which he was capable of measuring lifetimes as short as 10-4 s. It was known that lifetimes considerably varied from one compound to the other, and he demonstrated in this sense that the phosphorescence of Iceland spar stayed visible for some seconds after irradiation, while that of the potassium platinum cyanide ended after 3.10 4 s. In 1861 Becquerel established an exponential law for the decay of phosphorescence, and postulated two different types of decay kinetics, i.e., exponential and hyperbolic, attributing them to monomolecular or bimolecular decay mechanisms. Becquerel criticized the use of the term fluorescence, a term introduced by Stokes, instead of employing the term phosphorescence, already assigned for this use [17, 19, 20], His son, Henri Becquerel (1852-1908), is assigned a special position in history because of his accidental discovery of radioactivity in 1896, when studying the luminescence of some uranium salts [17]. [Pg.7]

Reaction characterisation by calorimetry generally involves construction of a model complete with kinetic and thermodynamic parameters (e.g. rate constants and reaction enthalpies) for the steps which together comprise the overall process. Experimental calorimetric measurements are then compared with those simulated on the basis of the reaction model and particular values for the various parameters. The measurements could be of heat evolution measured as a function of time for the reaction carried out isothermally under specified conditions. Congruence between the experimental measurements and simulated values is taken as the support for the model and the reliability of the parameters, which may then be used for the design of a manufacturing process, for example. A reaction modelin this sense should not be confused with a mechanism in the sense used by most organic chemists-they are different but equally valid descriptions of the reaction. The model is empirical and comprises a set of chemical equations and associated kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. The mechanism comprises a description of how at the molecular level reactants become products. Whilst there is no necessary connection between a useful model and the mechanism (known or otherwise), the application of sound mechanistic principles is likely to provide the most effective route to a good model. [Pg.11]

Investigations with the graphs of non-linear mechanisms had been stimulated by an actual problem of chemical kinetics to examine a complex dynamic behaviour. This problem was formulated as follows for what mechanisms or, for a given mechanism, in what region of the parameters can a multiplicity of steady-states and self-oscillations of the reaction rates be observed Neither of the above formalisms (of both enzyme kinetics and the steady-state reaction theory) could answer this question. Hence it was necessary to construct a mainly new formalism using bipartite graphs. It was this formalism that was elaborated in the 1970s. [Pg.198]


See other pages where Kinetic Parameters - Mechanism Construction is mentioned: [Pg.144]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.2547]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.154]   


SEARCH



Kinetic mechanism

Kinetic parameters

Kinetics mechanisms

Kinetics parameters

Mechanical Construction

Mechanical parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info