Iteration pattern

Experience has followed an iterative pattern in playing the model exercises against field measurements. Usually, the first indication of the relative importance of variables is seen in bodies of observational data. The next step is to build a model on the basis of either intuition or a deterministic physical equation that reflects the trends seen in the data. The model is then used for the range of conditions in the data base, and uncertainties as to the correctness or completeness of the model become evident. The questions that arise can usually be answered only through further field experimentation. Thus, the models themselves are used in the design of both laboratory and field experiments that will ultimately provide a basis for the improvement of the modeling art. 

Qualitative universality of patterns) The U-sequence dictates the ordering of the windows, but it actually says more it dictates the iteration pattern within each window. (See Exercise 10.4.7 for the definition of iteration patterns.) For instance, consider the large period-6 window for the logistic and sine maps, visible inFigure 10.6.2. 

Period 4) Consider the iteration patterns of all possible period-4 orbits for the logistic map, or any other unimodal map governed by the U-sequence. 

This method, also referred to as the Assessing to Learn (A2L) approach was proposed by Dufresne et al. (2000). In this approach, a question cycle or iterative pattern is proposed. In that way the students read a question, think about it alone and/or discuss it in small groups, enter responses, then view the chart of response counts, present and discuss arguments for various choices, and then listen to an appropriate closure to the cycle. 

The theory also predicts the iteration patterns of the maps—the order of visitation of points on the X-axis. Each iteration pattern is predicted to occur only once, and for a given value of bifurcation parameter not more than one periodic state is stable. 

All the U-sequence states with periods 3, 4, and 5 have been observed in BZ experiments, and some of the U-sequence states with periods 6,7,8,9, and 10 have also been observed [24,47]. Within the experimental resolution the order of occurrence of the periodic states and the observed iteration patterns are in accord with the theory for one-dimensional maps. 

In an SCF calculation, the energies from one iteration to the next can follow one of several patterns ... 

In his early survey of computer experiments in materials science , Beeler (1970), in the book chapter already cited, divides such experiments into four categories. One is the Monte Carlo approach. The second is the dynamic approach (today usually named molecular dynamics), in which a finite system of N particles (usually atoms) is treated by setting up 3A equations of motion which are coupled through an assumed two-body potential, and the set of 3A differential equations is then solved numerically on a computer to give the space trajectories and velocities of all particles as function of successive time steps. The third is what Beeler called the variational approach, used to establish equilibrium configurations of atoms in (for instance) a crystal dislocation and also to establish what happens to the atoms when the defect moves each atom is moved in turn, one at a time, in a self-consistent iterative process, until the total energy of the system is minimised. The fourth category of computer experiment is what Beeler called a pattern development... 

The general principle behind most commonly used back-propagation learning methods is the delta rule, by which an objective function involving squares of the output errors from the network is minimized. The delta rule requires that the sigmoidal function used at each neuron be continuously differentiable. This methods identifies an error associated with each neuron for each iteration involving a cause-effect pattern. Therefore, the error for each neuron in the output layer can be represented as ... 

One of the ino.st intriguing patterns in Life is an oscillatory propagating pattern known as the glider. Shown on the left-hand-side of figure 1.5, it consists of 5 live cells and reproduces itself in a diagonally displaced position once every four iterations. 

T (= number of iterations before pattern repeats) - is r particle defined by (r + 1) consecutive I s. 

There should exist simple patterns that evolve for many iterations before. settling into a simple (either stable or oscillatory) final static... 

A remarkable, but (at first sight, at least) naively unimpressive, feature of this rule is its class c4-like ability to give rise to complex ordered patterns out of an initially disordered state, or primordial soup. In figure 3.65, for example, which provides a few snapshot views of the evolution of four different random initial states taken during the first 50 iterations, we see evidence of the same typically class c4-like behavior that we have already seen so much of in one-dimensional systems. What distinguishes this system from all of the previous ones that we have studied, however, and makes this rule truly remarkable, is that Life has been proven to be capable of universal computation. 

This remarkable five five-cell pattern is called a glider because after two iteration steps it produces a pattern that is both diagonally displaced by one site and reflected in a diagonal line - i.e., patterns separated by two steps are related by a glide reflection. In this way, the original pattern is reproduced in a diagonally displaced position every four iterations. 

Although, for either lattice, the iterative application of the update rules themselves is straightforward, the visualization of the time evolution of patterns is complicated by the fact that not all sites can be seen at one time. 

The short answer is that the ON/OFF bits are real on the microscopic level and the objects are real on a higher, emergent level. A glider is a specific pattern of lower-level bits that, unless it comes into contact with other patterns, is faithfully reproduced in a diagonally displaced position every four iterations. The deeper answer is that both questions are ill-posed because neither object nor real can be objectively defined. Both terms can be understood only when interpreted modulo a specific dynamical level. 

And yet in spite of these remarkable successes such an ab initio approach may still be considered to be semi-empirical in a rather specific sense. In order to obtain calculated points shown in the diagram the Schrodinger equation must be solved separately for each of the 53 atoms concerned in this study. The approach therefore represents a form of "empirical mathematics" where one calculates 53 individual Schrodinger equations in order to reproduce the well known pattern in the periodicities of ionization energies. It is as if one had performed 53 individual experiments, although the experiments in this case are all iterative mathematical computations. This is still therefore not a general solution to the problem of the electronic structure of atoms. 

Remark Quite often, the Dirichlet problem is approximated by the method based on the difference approximation at the near-boundary nodes of the Laplace operator on an irregular pattern, with the use of formulae (14) instead of (16) at the nodes x G However, in some cases the difference operator so constructed does not possess several important properties intrinsic to the initial differential equation, namely, the self-adjointness and the property of having fixed sign, For this reason iterative methods are of little use in studying grid equations and will be excluded from further consideration. 

We then examine a series of 100 runs, or equivalently and more conveniently, one run starting with 100 blue cells using a 10 x 10 grid. Import the results to a plotting program (e.g., EXCEL ) and plot the number of As remaining versus the number of iterations. Does the pattern look like exponential decay ... 

Repeat this process for all input patterns. One iteration or epoch is defined as one weight correction for all examples of the training set. 

As described in Section 44.5.5, the weights are adapted along the gradient that minimizes the error in the training set, using the back-propagation strategy. One iteration is not sufficient to reach the minimum in the error surface. Care must be taken that the sequence of input patterns is randomized at each iteration, otherwise bias can be introduced. Several (50 to 5000) iterations are typically required to reach the minimum. 

---