Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ionic strength modification

We can attribute this modification to a decrease in the diffuse layer thickness under ionic strength variations. It seems also that the NF90 membrane is less sensitive to ionic strength modifications in comparison to NF270. [Pg.74]

Eactors that could potentiaHy affect microbial retention include filter type, eg, stmcture, base polymer, surface modification chemistry, pore size distribution, and thickness fluid components, eg, formulation, surfactants, and additives sterilization conditions, eg, temperature, pressure, and time fluid properties, eg, pH, viscosity, osmolarity, and ionic strength and process conditions, eg, temperature, pressure differential, flow rate, and time. [Pg.140]

The actual characteristics of REV produced depend on a number of factors such as choice of lipids (% cholesterol and charged lipids), lipid concentration used in the organic solvent, rate of evaporation, and ionic strength of the aqueous phase (Szoka and Papahadjopoulos, 1980). Modifications of this REV technique were proposed by several groups. The SPLV (stable plurilamellar vesicles) method consists of bath-sonicating an emulsion of the aqueous phase in an ether solution of lipid while evaporating the ether (Griiner et al., 1985). [Pg.265]

These two studies in particular are important. They demonstrate that not only can Pn peptide self-assembly be adjusted by sequence modification to suit a particular ionic strength and pH (e.g. conditions found in vitro or in vivo) but that it can be also made reversible and responsive. This raises the possibility that these peptides can be used in drug delivery, or as therapeutics that self-assemble post-injection. [Pg.41]

In the presence of polyethylene oxide MW 300,000 at a concentration of 0.025 g liter , variations in pH and ionic strength have no effect on elution volumes and a single calibration curve is obtained as shown in Figure 4 and Table II. This behavior presumably also results from modification of the glass surface by the polyethylene oxide surfactant, but in this case charge effects appear to be completely suppressed and the effective pore diameter and volume reduced. Such an interpretation is also in accord with the fact that the elution voliomes are lower with polyethylene oxide than with Tergitol, since Tergitol is a much smaller molecule than the polyethylene oxide. [Pg.275]

Wang, Y. and Dubin, RL., Capillary modification by non-covalent polycation adsorption effects of polymer molecular weight and adsorption ionic strength, Anal. Chem. 71, 3463, 1999. [Pg.441]

Klapper I, Hagstrom R, Fine R, Sharp K, Honig B (1986) Focusing of Electric Fields in the Active Site of Cu-Zn Superoxide Dismutase Effects of Ionic Strength and Amino-Acid Modification. Proteins 1 47-59. [Pg.281]

For capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) mass spectrometry coupling, another modification of an ESI interface has been developed. This interface uses a sheath flow of liquid to make the electrical contact at the CZE terminus, thus defining both the CZE and electrospray field gradients. This way, the composition of the electro sprayed liquid can be controlled independently of the CZE buffer, thereby providing operation with buffers that could not be used previously, e.g., aqueous and high ionic strength buffers. In addition, the interface operation becomes independent of the CZE flow rate. [62]... [Pg.446]

On the other hand, combinations between Eqs. (44) and (45) show how, via modification of the electrostatic potential, ionic strength affects Km (and Ky, inhibitor constants), and thus the enzyme activity. [Pg.312]

Effect of salt type and concentration The ionic strength of the aqueous solution in eontaet with a reverse micelle phase affects protein partitioning in a number of ways [18,23]. The first is through modification of electrostatic interactions between the protein surface and the surfaetant head groups by modifieation of the eleetrieal double layers adjacent to both the eharged inner mieelle wall and the protein surface. The second effect is to salt out the protein from the mieelle phase because of the inereased propensity of the ionie speeies to migrate to the micelle water pool, reduee the size of the reverse mieelles, and thus displace the protein. [Pg.664]

The increase in energy content of an atom, ion, or molecular entity or the process that makes an atom, ion, or molecular entity more active or reactive. In enzymology, activation often refers to processes that result in increased enzyme activity. For example, increasing temperature often can have a positive effect on enzyme activity (See Arrhenius Equation). Other examples of enzyme activation include (1) proteolysis of zymogens (2) alterations in ionic strength (3) alterations due to pH changes (4) activation in cooperative systems (5) lipid or membrane interface activation (6) metal ion effects (7) autocatalysis and (8) covalent modification. [Pg.25]

The control via activation or inhibition of the rate(s) of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction(s). This control includes the increase or decrease in the stability or half-life of the enzyme(s). There are many different means by which control can be achieved. These include 1. Substrate availability and reaction conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, ionic strength, lipid interface activation) 2. Magnitude of Vraax sud valucs) 3. Activation (particularly, feedforward activation) 4. Isozyme formation 5. Com-partmentalization and channeling 6. Oligomerization/ polymerization 7. Feedback inhibition and cooperativity (particularly, allosterism and/or hysteresis) 8. Covalent modification and 9. Gene regulation (induction repression)... [Pg.615]

The delipidated serum lipoprotein proteins exhibit solubility differences in aqueous media. The polypeptides of HDL and the D polypeptides of VLDL are readily soluble in aqueous media, particularly in slightly alkaline low-ionic strength buffers (S28, S30). In contrast, the LDL protein does not dissolve in such buffers and, like many other water-insoluble proteins, requires denaturing agents, detergents, or suitable chemical modification. The many techniques for the solubilization of apo LDL have been reviewed recently (G15). A thorough assessment of such techniques is not possible since not all the solubilized products have been characterized. The choice of the method presently depends on the investigator s preference and experimental needs. [Pg.119]

As described for lEC, elution is done by a stepwise or a continuous change of buffer composition. The mildest elution buffer is an aqueous buffer with low ionic strength, e.g., 20 mm Tris-HCl. If it is not successful, desorb with a chaotropic solvent, e.g., 2 M potassium rhodanide (thiocyanate), 2.5 M guanidinium hydrochloride, up to 7 M urea, or with increasing concentrations of methanol or acetonitrile. Especially the use of rhodanide or urea may be accompanied by a chemical modification of amino acid side chains, which disturbs amino acid analysis. [Pg.108]

It is not possible to prescribe specific pretreatment procedures here because these can only be decided upon when the system and the purpose of the experiments has been properly defined. However, a wealth of information exist in various biochemical reference books on how to isolate various biological compounds. The recommended techniques and methods could be used as part of the trace element speciation protocol often after slight modification, taking into consideration the following points First, the trace element blank levels have to be low, less than 10% of the total concentration in the sample. Second, the regents used should not interfere with subsequent analytical determinations. Third, the experimental conditions should not deviate markedly from those found in vivo, especially the pH and ionic strength of the medium. [Pg.149]

The simple solubility model is not adequate to explain the variation of observed effects with molecular weight, concentration and ionic strength. However, its simplicity and relative ease of use warrant further modification. [Pg.160]


See other pages where Ionic strength modification is mentioned: [Pg.397]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.64]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.87 , Pg.89 ]




SEARCH



Ionic strength

© 2024 chempedia.info