Ionic polymerization initiator

The purification procedures to be applied depend on the monomer, on the expected impurities, and especially on the purpose for which the monomer is to be employed, e.g., whether it is to be used for radical polymerization in aqueous emulsion or for ionic polymerization initiated with sodium naphthalene. It is not possible to devise a general purification scheme instead the most suitable method must be chosen in each case from those given below. A prerequisite for successful purification is extreme cleanliness of all apparatus (if necessary, treating with hot nitrating acid and repeatedly thorough washing with distilled water). 

Ionic polymerization initiated by high-energy radiation might offer such an opportunity. The ejected electron might be sufficiently far from the positive center which initiates the polymerization. Its growth therefore would proceed in absence of a counter-ion. 

The epoxy or oxirane group is characterized by its reactivity toward both nucleophilic and electrophilic species and it is thus receptive to a wide range of reagents. Epoxy monomers polymerize through step-growth and chain-growth processes. The ionic polymerization initiated by both Lewis bases or acids will be discussed later (Sec. 2.3.4). The case of polyaddition polymerizations is mainly represented by epoxy-amine reactions. 

In the previous sections, methods of qualitatively controlling the course of propagation were described. Indirect control as well as the quantitative effects caused by intentional control of the other partial processes in polymerization have still to be mentioned. The separation of initiation from propagation alters the kinetic character of the whole reaction. With ionic polymerizations, initiation can be separated from propagation by the selection of conditions suitable for rapid initiation. With radical polymerizations, this is not possible. Therefore both partial processes must be separated in space. Fortunately, radical active centres operate both in polar and in non polar media. Thus it is not difficult to confine initiation and propagation to mutually immiscible components of the medium. Emulsion polymerization remains the most important representative of quantitative control of propagation. 

However, a variety of common radical and ionic polymerization initiators were incapable of polymerizing this tetracyclic compound. The only method of... 

The type of monomers suitable for cationic polymerization are those containing an electron-donating substituent such as 1,1-dialkyl, alkene, alkoxy, and phenyl that stabilize the propagating cationic centers. Successftil industrial examples include polyisobutylene and its copolymers with dienes such as butyl mbber. In ionic polymerization, initiator is conventionally called a catalyst. However, by definition, catalyst and initiator are two different types of reagents. Catalyst takes part in reactions but can be removed from the final product if necessary. On the other side, initiator molecules or their fragments become a part of the produced chains after polymerization. In cationic polymerization, a single catalyst is not sufficient and a cocatalyst is required. Typical catalysts are Lewis acids such as BF3, AICI3, and TiCU that must be used with a protonic cocatalyst such as H2O and methanol ... 

The initiators which are used in addition polymerizations are sometimes called catalysts, although strictly speaking this is a misnomer. A true catalyst is recoverable at the end of the reaction, chemically unchanged. Tliis is not true of the initiator molecules in addition polymerizations. Monomer and polymer are the initial and final states of the polymerization process, and these govern the thermodynamics of the reaction the nature and concentration of the intermediates in the process, on the other hand, determine the rate. This makes initiator and catalyst synonyms for the same material The former term stresses the effect of the reagent on the intermediate, and the latter its effect on the rate. The term catalyst is particularly common in the language of ionic polymerizations, but this terminology should not obscure the importance of the initiation step in the overall polymerization mechanism. 

Both modes of ionic polymerization are described by the same vocabulary as the corresponding steps in the free-radical mechanism for chain-growth polymerization. However, initiation, propagation, transfer, and termination are quite different than in the free-radical case and, in fact, different in many ways between anionic and cationic mechanisms. Our comments on the ionic mechanisms will touch many of the same points as the free-radical discussion, although in a far more abbreviated form. 

In ionic polymerizations termination by combination does not occur, since all of the polymer ions have the same charge. In addition, there are solvents such as dioxane and tetrahydrofuran in which chain transfer reactions are unimportant for anionic polymers. Therefore it is possible for these reactions to continue without transfer or termination until all monomer has reacted. Evidence for this comes from the fact that the polymerization can be reactivated if a second batch of monomer is added after the initial reaction has gone to completion. In this case the molecular weight of the polymer increases, since no new growth centers are initiated. Because of this absence of termination, such polymers are called living polymers. 

The molecular weight distribution for a polymer like that described above is remarkably narrow compared to free-radical polymerization or even to ionic polymerization in which transfer or termination occurs. The sharpness arises from the nearly simultaneous initiation of all chains and the fact that all active centers grow as long as monomer is present. The following steps outline a quantitative treatment of this effect ... 

The thermal (or photochemical) decomposition of the azo group gives rise to a radically initiated polymerization. The reactive site F, the transformation site, however, can, depending on its chemical nature, initiate a condensation or addition type reaction. It can also start radical or ionic polymerizations. F may also terminate a polymerization or even enable the azo initiator to act as a monomer in chain polymerizations. 

An important difference between free radical and ionic polymerization is that a counter ion only appears in the latter case. For example, the intermediate formed from the initiation of propene with BF3-H2O could be represented as... 

Yoshida, H. and Hayashi, K. Initiation Process of Radiation-induced Ionic Polymerization as Studied by Electron Spin Resonance. Vol. 6, pp. 401—420. 

Radiolytic ethylene destruction occurs with a yield of ca. 20 molecules consumed/100 e.v. (36, 48). Products containing up to six carbons account for ca. 60% of that amount, and can be ascribed to free radical reactions, molecular detachments, and low order ion-molecule reactions (32). This leaves only eight molecules/100 e.v. which may have formed ethylene polymer, corresponding to a chain length of only 2.1 molecules/ ion. Even if we assumed that ethylene destruction were entirely the result of ionic polymerization, only about five ethylene molecules would be involved per ion pair. The absence of ionic polymerization can also be demonstrated by the results of the gamma ray initiated polymerization of ethylene, whose kinetics can be completely explained on the basis of conventional free radical reactions and known rate constants for these processes (32). An increase above the expected rates occurs only at pressures in excess of ca. 20 atmospheres (10). The virtual absence of ionic polymerization can be regarded as one of the most surprising aspects of the radiation chemistry of ethylene. 

Michel, A., Brister, L.B., and Fhiskas, J.E. Novel epoxide initiators for carbocationic polymerizations, NATO ASI Ionic Polymerizations and Related Processes, NATO Science Series 359, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1999. 

Ionic Polymerization. Ionic polymerizations, especially cationic polymerizations, are not as well understood as radical polymerizations because of experimental difficulties involved in their study. The nature of the reaction media is not always clear since heterogeneous initiators are often involved. Further, it is much more difficult to obtain reproducible data because ionic polymerizations proceed at very fast rates and are highly sensitive to small concentrations of impurities and adventitious materials. Butyl rubber, a polymer of isobutene and isoprene, is produced commercially by cationic polymerization. Anionic polymerization is used for various polymerizations of 1,3-butadiene and isoprene. 

Surface-initiated Polymerization Using Living Ionic Polymerization... 

While in most of the reports on SIP free radical polymerization is utihzed, the restricted synthetic possibihties and lack of control of the polymerization in terms of the achievable variation of the polymer brush architecture limited its use. The alternatives for the preparation of weU-defined brush systems were hving ionic polymerizations. Recently, controlled radical polymerization techniques has been developed and almost immediately apphed in SIP to prepare stracturally weU-de-fined brush systems. This includes living radical polymerization using nitroxide species such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidin-l-oxyl (TEMPO) [285], reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization mainly utilizing dithio-carbamates as iniferters (iniferter describes a molecule that functions as an initiator, chain transfer agent and terminator during polymerization) [286], as well as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were the free radical is formed by a reversible reduction-oxidation process of added metal complexes [287]. All techniques rely on the principle to drastically reduce the number of free radicals by the formation of a dormant species in equilibrium to an active free radical. By this the characteristic side reactions of free radicals are effectively suppressed. 

The same aplies to polymer brushes. The use of SAMs as initiator systems for surface-initiated polymerization results in defined polymer brushes of known composition and morphology. The different polymerization techniques, from free radical to living ionic polymerizations and especially the recently developed controlled radical polymerization allows reproducible synthesis of strictly linear, hy-perbranched, dentritic or cross-linked polymer layer structures on solids. The added flexibility and functionality results in robust grafted supports with higher capacity and improved accessibility of surface functions. The collective and fast response of such layers could be used for the design of polymer-bonded catalytic systems with controllable activity. 

Ionic polymerization may also occur with cationic initiations such as protonic acids like HF and H2SO4 or Lewis acids like BF3, AICI3, and SnC. The polymerization of isobutylene is a common example, shown in Fig. 14.5. Note that the two inductively donating methyl groups stabilize the carbocation intermediate. Chain termination, if it does occur, usually proceeds by loss of a proton to form a terminal double bond. This regenerates the catalyst. 

Compared with free radical polymerizations, the kinetics of ionic polymerizations are not well defined. Reactions can use heterogeneous initiators and they are usually quite sensitive to the presence of impurities. Thus, kinetic studies are difficult and the results sensitive to the particular reaction conditions. Further, the rates of polymer formation are more rapid. 

Both the initiation step and the propagation step are dependent on the stability of the carbocations. Isobutylene (the first monomer to be commercially polymerized by ionic initiators), vinyl ethers, and styrene have been polymerized by this technique. The order of activity for olefins is Me2C=CH2 > MeCH=CH2 > CH2=CH2, and for para-substituted styrenes the order for the substituents is Me—O > Me > H > Cl. The mechanism is also dependent on the solvent as well as the electrophilicity of the monomer and the nucleophi-licity of the gegenion. Rearrangements may occur in ionic polymerizations. 

Monomer and initiator must be soluble in the liquid and the solvent must have the desired chain-transfer characteristics, boiling point (above the temperature necessary to carry out the polymerization and low enough to allow for ready removal if the polymer is recovered by solvent evaporation). The presence of the solvent assists in heat removal and control (as it also does for suspension and emulsion polymerization systems). Polymer yield per reaction volume is lower than for bulk reactions. Also, solvent recovery and removal (from the polymer) is necessary. Many free radical and ionic polymerizations are carried out utilizing solution polymerization including water-soluble polymers prepared in aqueous solution (namely poly(acrylic acid), polyacrylamide, and poly(A-vinylpyrrolidinone). Polystyrene, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl chloride), and polybutadiene are prepared from organic solution polymerizations. 

The ionic chain polymerization of unsaturated linkages is considered in this chapter, primarily the polymerization of the carbon-carbon double bond by cationic and anionic initiators (Secs. 5-2 and 5-3). The last part of the chapter considers the polymerization of other unsaturated linkages. Polymerizations initiated by coordination and metal oxide initiators are usually also ionic in nature. These are called coordination polymerizations and are considered separately in Chap. 8. Ionic polymerizations of cyclic monomers is discussed in Chap. 7. The polymerization of conjugated dienes is considered in Chap. 8. Cyclopolymerization of nonconjugated dienes is discussed in Chap. 6. 

---