Intramolecular reactions definition

It is remarkable that in the same year, 1934, two independent approaches, those of Stoll et al. and of Kuhn, led to the definition of two quantities which are conceptually quite similar and can be practically identical in many actual cases. In either case the intramolecular reaction is compared to a corresponding intermolecular process. This is the dimerisation reaction of the bifunctional reactant in the definition of the cyclisation constant C in the case of the effective concentration Crff Winter must be determined with the aid of an inter-molecular model reaction, the choice of which is not always obvious and can possibly lead to conceptual as well as experimental difficulties. It is also worth noting that although these early workers established a firm basis for interpretation of physical as well as of preparative aspects of intramolecular reactions, no extensive use of quantities C and Qff appears to have been made in the chemical literature over more than three decades after their definition. This is in spite of the enormous development of studies in the field of... 

The best way to combine all these parameters is to trace back the catalytic action of enzymes to intramolecularity. It is generally accepted that when van der Waals distances (contact distances) are imposed for definite times upon reactive groups, intramolecular reactions occur then at enzyme-like rates (accelerations of 10 to 10 0 are associated to enzyme-catalysed reactions). On the other hand, according to the Page-Jencks theory [17] the fast rates of intramolecular reaction "are merely an entropic consequence of converting a bimolecular reaction into a unimolecular reaction". 

It is shown that model, end-linked networks cannot be perfect networks. Simply from the mechanism of formation, post-gel intramolecular reaction must occur and some of this leads to the formation of inelastic loops. Data on the small-strain, shear moduli of trifunctional and tetrafunctional polyurethane networks from polyols of various molar masses, and the extents of reaction at gelation occurring during their formation are considered in more detail than hitherto. The networks, prepared in bulk and at various dilutions in solvent, show extents of reaction at gelation which indicate pre-gel intramolecular reaction and small-strain moduli which are lower than those expected for perfect network structures. From the systematic variations of moduli and gel points with dilution of preparation, it is deduced that the networks follow affine behaviour at small strains and that even in the limit of no pre-gel intramolecular reaction, the occurrence of post-gel intramolecular reaction means that network defects still occur. In addition, from the variation of defects with polyol molar mass it is demonstrated that defects will still persist in the limit of infinite molar mass. In this limit, theoretical arguments are used to define the minimal significant structures which must be considered for the definition of the properties and structures of real networks. 

The same models as for intermolccular processes are applied for intramolecular diastereoface differentiating double-bond additions. However, there are some advantages in the intramolecular version. Firstly, the entropy factor lowers the barrier of activation and allows reactions to proceed at lower temperatures, which increases the selectivity. Secondly, the cyclic transition states introduce the elements of ring strain and transannular interactions, which lead to enhanced differences between two diastereomorphous geometries. Both of these factors cooperate to increase the selectivity of the intramolecular reaction. For example, halolactonization, by definition, is an intramolecular process. 

As stated in Sec. 3.1, only ideal systems will be considered in this section. This definition implies that there is no intramolecular reaction, a condition which is satisfied in practice for very low concentrations of Af monomers (f >2), in the A2 + Af chainwise polymerization. To take into account intramolecular reactions it would be necessary to introduce more advanced methods to describe network formation, such as dynamic Monte Carlo simulations. 

There are several fundamental reasons why the GMH and adiabatic formulations are to be preferred over the traditionally employed diabatic formulation. The definition of the diabatic basis set is straightforward for intermolecular ET reactions when the donor and acceptor units are separated before the reaction and form a donor-acceptor complex in the course of diffusion in a liquid solvent. The diabatic states are then defined as those of separate donor and acceptor units. The current trend in experimental design of donor-acceptor systems, however, has focused more attention on intramolecular reactions where the donor and acceptor units are coupled in one molecule by a bridge.The direct donor-acceptor overlap and the mixing to bridge states both lead to electronic delocalization, with the result that the centers of electronic localization and localized diabatic states are ill-defined. It is then more appropriate to use either the GMH or adiabatic formulation. 

Compared with photooxygenation, i.e. the photochemical activation of oxygen, the definition of photoreduction is more difficult. Many photochemical processes involve redox reactions where one part of the substrate (in intramolecular reactions) or a second molecule (in intermolecular reactions) is reduced and the original substrate is oxidized (or... 

The answer to this question depends on the definition of strain . That large rate increases are possible when an intramolecular reaction relieves non-bonded tension elsewhere in the molecule is certainly true. A prime example is given (4) ... 

In order to define how the nuclei move as a reaction progresses from reactants to transition structure to products, one must choose a definition of how a reaction occurs. There are two such definitions in common use. One definition is the minimum energy path (MEP), which defines a reaction coordinate in which the absolute minimum amount of energy is necessary to reach each point on the coordinate. A second definition is a dynamical description of how molecules undergo intramolecular vibrational redistribution until the vibrational motion occurs in a direction that leads to a reaction. The MEP definition is an intuitive description of the reaction steps. The dynamical description more closely describes the true behavior molecules as seen with femtosecond spectroscopy. 

The contribution of the frontier orbitals would be maximized in certain special donor-acceptor reactions. The stabilization energy is represented by Eqs. (3.25) and (3.26). Even in a less extreme case, the frontier orbital contribution maybe much more than in the expression of the superdelocalizability. If we adopt the approximation of Eq. (6.3), the intramolecular comparison of reactivity can be made only by the numerator value. In this way, it is understood that the frontier electron density, /r, is qualified to be an intramolecular reactivity index. The finding of the parallelism between fr and the experimental results has thus become the origin of the frontier-electron theory. The definition of fr is hence as follows ... 

Pyridine ylide/LFP studies of 83-85 in pentane or isooctane afforded carbene lifetimes of 21-24 ns (k 4 to 5 x 107 s 1), similar to the lifetime of dimethylcarbene under these conditions. Unfortunately, these lifetimes are limited by reactions with the hydrocarbon solvents the lifetime of 83 is 1.5 times longer in cyclohexane-d12 than in cyclohexane. The observation that the lifetimes of 55-CI ( 1000 ns) and 55-F (—7000 ns) are considerably longer than those of 83 and 84 could reflect the superior stabilization provided by the halogen spectator substituents of 55, but this conclusion is tentative in the absence of definitive intramolecularly controlled lifetimes for 83-85. 

The model shown in Scheme 2 indicates that a change in the formal oxidation state of the metal is not necessarily required during the catalytic reaction. This raises a fundamental question. Does the metal ion have to possess specific redox properties in order to be an efficient catalyst A definite answer to this question cannot be given. Nevertheless, catalytic autoxidation reactions have been reported almost exclusively with metal ions which are susceptible to redox reactions under ambient conditions. This is a strong indication that intramolecular electron transfer occurs within the MS"+ and/or MS-O2 precursor complexes. Partial oxidation or reduction of the metal center obviously alters the electronic structure of the substrate and/or dioxygen. In a few cases, direct spectroscopic or other evidence was reported to prove such an internal charge transfer process. This electronic distortion is most likely necessary to activate the substrate and/or dioxygen before the actual electron transfer takes place. For a few systems where deviations from this pattern were found, the presence of trace amounts of catalytically active impurities are suspected to be the cause. In other words, the catalytic effect is due to the impurity and not to the bulk metal ion in these cases. 

The effective molarity (EM) is formally the concentration of the catalytic group (RCOO- in [5]) required to make the intermolecular reaction go at the observed rate of the intramolecular process. In practice many measured EM s represent physically unattainable concentrations, and the formal definition is probably relevant only in reactions (which will generally involve very large cyclic transition states) where the formation of the ring or cyclic transition state per se is enthalpically neutral, or in diffusion-controlled processes. For the formation of small and medium-sized rings and cyclic transition states the EM as defined above contains, and may indeed be dominated by, the enthalpy of formation of the cyclic form. This topic has been discussed briefly by Illuminati et al. (1977) and will be treated at greater length in a future volume in this series. 

Stereochemical probes of intramolecular H-abstraction leads to a conclusion not in contradiction with the II electronic configuration and also reveals that simple amidyl radicals react exclusively as the N-radical but not the 0-radical (25). Scarcity of data in this area does not allow a definitive discussion on stereochemical controls of amidyl radical reactions that are being studied in our group. 

---