Interfacial block-copolymers

Cheyne RB, Moffitt MG (2007) Controllable organization of quantum dots into mesoscale wires and cables via interfacial block copolymer self-assembly. Macromolecules 40(6) 2046-2057... 

Heterogeneous alloys can be formed when graft or block copolymers are combined with a compatible polymer. Alloys of incompatible polymers can be formed if an interfacial agent can be found. 

A brief review has appeared covering the use of metal-free initiators in living anionic polymerizations of acrylates and a comparison with Du Font s group-transfer polymerization method (149). Tetrabutylammonium thiolates mn room temperature polymerizations to quantitative conversions yielding polymers of narrow molecular weight distributions in dipolar aprotic solvents. Block copolymers are accessible through sequential monomer additions (149—151) and interfacial polymerizations (152,153). 

Brown [46] continued the contact mechanics work on elastomers and interfacial chains in his studies on the effect of interfacial chains on friction. In these studies. Brown used a crosslinked PDMS spherical cap in contact with a layer of PDMS-PS block copolymer. The thickness, and hence the area density, of the PDMS-PS layer was varied. The thickness was varied from 1.2 nm (X = 0.007 chains per nm-) to 9.2 nm (X = 0.055 chains per nm-). It was found that the PDMS layer thickness was less than about 2.4 nm, the frictional force between the PDMS network and the flat surface layer was high, and it was also higher than the frictional force between the PDMS network and bare PS. When the PDMS layer thicknesses was 5.6 nm and above, the frictional force decreased dramatically well below the friction between PDMS and PS. Based on these data Brown [46] concluded that ... 

Creton, C., Kramer, E.J., Hui, C.-Y. and Brown, H.R., Failure mechanisms of polymer interfaces reinforced with block copolymers. Macromolecules, 25, 3075-3088 (1992). Boucher et al., E., Effects of the formation of copolymer on the interfacial adhesion between semicrystalline polymers. Macromolecules, 29, 774-782 (1996). 

Compatibility and various other properties such as morphology, crystalline behavior, structure, mechanical properties of natural rubber-polyethylene blends were investigated by Qin et al. [39]. Polyethylene-b-polyiso-prene acts as a successful compatibilizer here. Mechanical properties of the blends were improved upon the addition of the block copolymer (Table 12). The copolymer locates at the interface, and, thus, reduces the interfacial tension that is reflected in the mechanical properties. As the amount of graft copolymer increases, tensile strength and elongation at break increase and reach a leveling off. 

There have been many experimental investigations that studied the interfacial and surfactant properties of block copolymers. In addition to documenting the corn-... 

Addition of poly(styrene-block-butadiene) block copolymer to the polystyrene-polybutadiene-styrene ternary system first showed a characteristic decrease in interfacial tension followed by a leveling off. The leveling off is indicative of saturation of the interface by the solubilizing agent. 

This block copolymer acts as an emulsifying agent in the blends leading to a reduction in interfacial tension and improved adhesion. At concentrations higher than the critical value, the copolymer forms micelles in the continuous phase and thereby increases the domain size of the dispersed phase. 

The applicability of Noolandi and Hong s theory of compatibilization of immiscible blends using block copolymers has been extended to the reactive compatibilization technique by Thomas and coworkers [75,76]. According to Noolandi and Hong [77], the interfacial tension is expected to decrease linearly with the addition... 

In addition to a block copolymer, a microcapsule was made from suspension interfacial polycondensation between diacid chloride having aromatic-aliphatic azo group and aliphatic triamine [70,71]. The capsule was covered with a crosslinked structure having an azo group that was thermally stable but sensitive to light so as to be applicable to color photoprinting materials. 

The Alexander approach can also be applied to discover useful information in melts, such as the block copolymer microphases of Fig. 1D. In this situation the density of chains tethered to the interface is not arbitrary but is dictated by the equilibrium condition of the self-assembly process. In a melt, the chains must fill space at constant density within a single microphase and, in the case of block copolymers, minimize contacts between unlike monomers. A sharp interface results in this limit. The interaction energy per chain can then be related to the energy of this interface and written rather simply as Fin, = ykT(N/Lg), where ykT is the interfacial energy per unit area, q is the number density of chain segments and the term in parentheses is the reciprocal of the number of chains per unit area [49, 50]. The total energy per chain is then ... 

Cakmak M. and Wang M.D., Structure development in the tubular blown film of PP/EPDM thermoplastic elastomer, Antec 89, 47th Annual Tech. Conference of SPE, New York, May 1, 1989, 1756. Hashimoto T., Todo A., Itoi H., and Kawai H. Domain boundary structure of styrene-isoprene block copolymer films cast from solution. 2. Quantitative estimation of the interfacial thickness of lamellar microphase systems. Macromolecules, 10, 377, 1977. 

PS and PB homopolymers are immiscible. Any added PB-PS block copolymer in a PS-PB blend will have one sequence miscible in PS and one sequence miscible in PB, hence they will localise at the interface. As a consequence, the interfacial energy will decrease, greatly helping dispersion and providing phase adhesion, thus a transfer of mechanical properties. 

The results for different domain spacings are summarized in Table 3. It is obvious that cyclic block copolymers exhibit smaller domain spacings compared to their linear analogues, which is due to an entropically less favourable situation and an increased interfacial curvature. 

Additionally, some properties unique to both systems may result. The majority of homopolymer blends are immiscible with one another and often experience poor interfacial adhesion between the separate phases. Since block copolymers are covalently linked together, macroscopic incompatibility at the interface is minimized. The macroscopic incompatibility of a two-polymer blend may be eliminated by the addition of a block copolymer derived from the two systems. Hence, copolymers can be used to strengthen blends of immiscible polymers by serving as emulsifiers (7-9). 

---