Intercellular control

Intercellular control of the functions of mammalian cells has been long since evidenced by observations of experimental embryologists and, in recent years, one form of it, contact inhibition, discovered by Abercrombie and Heayesman (1954), has been a most popular subject of study. Contact inhibition is certainly one type of control which is generally not found in bacteria and this difference must be directly correlated with differences between the structures of bacterial and mammalian cell surfaces. Other differences between the structures of bacterial and mammalian cells are the presence in the latter of a nuclear membrane and of an elaborate mitotic apparatus. We shall have little to say about the latter and shall consider mainly the nuclear membrane, to which, we think, are delegated certain functions assumed, in bacteria, by the cell membrane and concerned with die coordinated replication of the chromosomes (Jacob et al., 1963). This idea represents one of a number of inferences from recent observations made in our laboratories on interspecific somatic hybrids between mammalian cells, and it is the primary purpose of this paper to present the evidence on which it is based (Note 2). 

Fig. 8. Activation of the PO binding with P, infestans cell walls (glucan-specific ) under pathogen inoculation and treatment with salicylic (SA) and jasmonic (JA) acids (A) Peroxidase activity in stomata guard cells and intercellular spaces of adjoining epidermal leaf cells and on the surface of mycelium contacting with the stomata (B). (1) Non-treated control (2) infection (3) treatment with SA (4) treatment with SA + infection (5) treatment with JA (6) treatment with JA + infection (7) treatment with SA + JA (8) treatment with SA + JA + infection g - gifs of P. infestans s - stomata guard cell. Specific to P, infestans cell walls, PO is highlighted.

Control of pelD uidA according to the presence of Fe(III) chelators and to iron availability in intercellular fluids of African violets... 

As indicated above in the section on "Genotoxic Effects", it is likely that mirex and chlordecone are tumor promoters and not tumor initiators. Initiators irreversibly alter DNA by a mutation, chromosomal aberration, or other alteration. Promoters act by facilitating the proliferation of previously initiated preneoplastic cells. One of the mechanisms for promotion is believed to involve suppression of inhibitory proliferative control through inhibition of gap-junctional-mediated intercellular communication as well as enzyme induction (Trosko et al. 1983). The results of studies to evaluate the promotional activity potential of mirex in mice indicate that mirex is a mouse skin cancer promoter but exerts this toxicity through a hitherto unknown mechanism that is different from that of phorbol esters, such as TPA (Meyer et al. 1993, 1994 Moser et al. 1992, 1993). Unlike initiation, promotion is a reversible process to a point. This implies, at least in theory, that there may be justification for setting NOAELs for promoters. 

One of the main functions of epithelia is to control water and solutes, compartmentalized by the regulation of transport across the epithelium from body interior to exterior (or vice versa). Deviations from the meticulously regulated movement of water and solutes across the epithelial barrier can lead to states of disease and can be detrimental to life. Fluids can traverse epithelia by one of two routes through the cells (transcellular transport) or between cells (intercellular or paracellular transport) (Figure 15.1A). 

Hormones are intercellular messengers. They are typically (1) steroids (e.g., estrogens, androgens, and mineral corticoids, which control the level of water and salts excreted by the kidney), (2) polypeptides (e.g., insulin and endorphins), and (3) amino acid derivatives (e.g., epinephrine, or adrenaline, and norepinephrine, or noradrenaline). Hormones maintain homeostasis—the balance of biological activities in the body for example, insulin controls the blood glucose level, epinephrine and norepinephrine mediate the response to the external environment, and growth hormone promotes normal healthy growth and development. 

A. Goldbeter, Pulsatile signaling as an optimal mode of intercellular communication, Proc. Bit. Symp. Control Release Bioact. Mater., 22, 107-108 (1995). 

The three best-known examples of biochemical oscillations were found during the decade 1965-1975 [40,41]. These include the peroxidase reaction, glycolytic oscillations in yeast and muscle, and the pulsatile release of cAMP signals in Dictyostelium amoebae (see Section V). Another decade passed before the development of Ca " " fluorescent probes led to the discovery of oscillations in intracellular Ca +. Oscillations in cytosolic Ca " " have since been found in a variety of cells where they can arise spontaneously, or after stimulation by hormones or neurotransmitters. Their period can range from seconds to minutes, depending on the cell type [56]. The oscillations are often accompanied by propagation of intracellular or intercellular Ca " " waves. The importance of Ca + oscillations and waves stems from the major role played by this ion in the control of many key cellular processes—for example, gene expression or neurotransmitter secretion. 

Figure 6. A Photomicrograph (x 51,000) of caffeine treated leaf epidermal cell showing electron-dense deposits on cell wall and membrane vesicles fusing with the plasmalemma (arrows). B Immunofluorescence labeling of flavonoids in cell walls of leaf epidermal strips (arrows) and autofluorescent stomata (x 62.5). C Immunogold labeling of the walls of a mesophyll cell (left, x 41,000). Ch, chloroplast EC, epidermal cell G, Golgi IS, intercellular space MC, mesophyll cell (right, control x 19,500).

Acetylcholine is involved in many aspects of the regulation of the cardiovascular system. Thus, it may also play a role in the control of intercellular communication. Very early in gap junction research the effect of acetylcholine as an important transmitter on gap junction conductance has been investigated. First, Petersen and Ueda [1976] demonstrated an increase in junctional resistance in pancreatic acinar cells following the application of acetylcholine. Concomitantly, the release of amylase was stimulated. A minimum concentration of 1 pmol/l acetycholine was required to evoke uncoupling. The next question was, how is the acetylcholine effect mediated Calcium has been considered to contribute to the mechanism of action [Iwatsuki and Pertersen,... 

---