Integrals over Gaussian-Type Functions

From the formulae it is seen that the computation of integrals is 

F function. In modern programs the values of F are obtained by means 0 198.  

We do not present here formulas for integrals over GTF s with 

---

The integrals over Gaussian-type functions can, therefore, be evaluated efficiently and accurately, a property which makes them by far the most popular choice of basis functions for studies of polyatomic molecules. 

The success of Cartesian Gaussian functions in quantum chemistry is based on efficient algorithms for the calculation of analytic integrals. For a review of the many different schemes that have been proposed, see [14]. We follow the simple scheme of Obara and Saika [30] that relies on recursion relations starting from basic integrals over s type functions. To derive the recursion relations we need two basic identities. First, the shift of angular momentum is achieved by... 

The newest semiempirical method is Semi-Ab initio Model 1 (SAM 1) by Dewar et al. [83]. As the acronym suggests, it is based on AML The two-electron integrals (jiv (tt), however, are calculated analytically over Gaussian-type functions and scaled empirically. Up to the present, no comprehensive list of SAMI parameters and error... 

This article will give an introduction and survey to some of the most important methods currently used to evaluate ERIs over Gaussian-type functions. This article will be limited to the cases in which the explicit value of the ERI is of interest. The details in the development of the formulae define the different integral methods. The article will also discuss briefly some of the practical implementation problems involved. 

Up to now we have assumed in this chapter the use of Slater-type orbitals. Actually, use may be made of any type of functions which form a complete set in Hilbert space. Since for practical reasons the expansion (2,1) must be always truncated, it is preferable to choose functions with a fast convergence. This requirement is probably best satisfied just for Slater-type functions. Nevertheless there is another aspect which must be taken into account. It is the rapidity with which we are able to evaluate the integrals over the basis set functions. This is particularly topical for many-center two-electron integrals. In this respect the use of the STO basis set is rather cumbersome. The only widely used alternative is a set of Gaus-slan-type functions (GTF). The properties of Gaussian-type functions are just the opposite - integrals are computed simply and, in comparison to the STO basis set, rather rapidly, but the convergence is slow. 

Note that in each case the only difference between the Gaussians of a given type is in the exponential, a. The coefficient in front simply normalizes the function so that the integral over all space is unity. 

The added mass should be evenly distributed over the electrode. The integral sensitivity determined can only be used for the calculation if this is the case because the maximum sensitivity at the center of the crystal decreases to zero at the edges of the electrode. The differential sensitivity (c/ = 5ff5m) is proportional to the sqitare of the vibration amplitude, and the amphtude distribution can be described by Gaussian-type or Bessel-type functions. The integral mass sensitivity can be computed from the differential sensitivity function ... 

---