Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Choosing a Functional

In the remainder of this section, we give a brief overview of some of the functionals that are most widely used in plane-wave DFT calculations by examining each of the different approaches identified in Fig. 10.2 in turn. The simplest approximation to the true Kohn-Sham functional is the local density approximation (LDA). In the LDA, the local exchange-correlation potential in the Kohn-Sham equations [Eq. (1.5)] is defined as the exchange potential for the spatially uniform electron gas with the same density as the local electron density  [Pg.216]

The exchange-correlation functional for the uniform electron gas is known to high precision for all values of the electron density, n. For some regimes, these results were determined from careful quantum Monte Carlo calculations, a computationally intensive technique that can converge to the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation. Practical LDA functionals use a continuous function that accurately fits the known values of gas(/i). Several different [Pg.216]

Nonempirical GGA functionals satisfy the uniform density limit. In addition, they satisfy several known, exact properties of the exchange-correlation hole. Two widely used nonempirical functionals that satisfy these properties are the Perdew-Wang 91 (PW91) functional and the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional. Because GGA functionals include more physical ingredients than the LDA functional, it is often assumed that nonempirical GGA functionals should be more accurate than the LDA. This is quite often true, but there are exceptions. One example is in the calculation of the surface energy of transition metals and oxides. [Pg.217]

The third rung of Jacob s ladder is defined by meta-GGA functionals, which include information from n r), Vn(r), and V2n(r). In practice, the kinetic energy density of the Kohn-Sham orbitals, [Pg.217]

The fourth rung of the ladder in Fig. 10.2 is important because the most common functionals used in quantum chemistry calculations with localized basis sets lie at this level. The exact exchange energy can be derived from the exchange energy density, which can be written in terms of the Kohn-Sham orbitals as [Pg.218]


Similar to the preceding section we choose a function 9 G C D) such that 0 = 1 in a neighbourhood of the point xi = (1,0). Consider the transformation of independent variables... [Pg.273]

The simplest, and most often used, method of estimating approximate spectral densities from their moments, is to choose a functional form with some parameters in it, and then choose the parameters so that the function has the correct moments. For example,35 a systematic method of doing this is to expand the spectral density in a series of orthonormal functions, and choose the first M expansion coefficients to match the M known moments, and setting the higher expansion coefficients to zero. However, this procedure has the disadvantage that the approximate spectral density need not come out positive. [Pg.94]

With modem computational techniques and computers, the QM region is typically evaluated with some DFT method. As with any decision to study an organic reaction, care must be taken while choosing a functional appropriate for the reaction at hand. Similarly, one needs to carefully select a basis set that provides sufficient flexibility while keeping an eye on the basis set size in order to keep the computations from becoming too long. [Pg.575]

What happens during Laplace transformation can be easily visualized by choosing a function, say, y = sin z, and representing the operation in a figure (Fig. 4.16). It can be seen" that the operation consists in finding the area under the curve ye between... [Pg.384]

The difficulty illustrated above has been discussed by Sandler and Libby (1991), who propose an alternate procedure for the method of moments as applied to a flash calculation. First, one chooses a functional form for one of the two distributions, with which one to choose being suggested by the particular problem one is trying to address. Next, one uses the mass balance condition, Eq. (35), to calculate the functional form for the mole fraction distribution in the other phase. The method of moments (or other solution procedures) can then be used to determine the parameters from the equilibrium condition. Following this procedure, no mass conservation problem arises. [Pg.21]

Thus, the usual approach to deriving intermolecular potentials from experimental data is to choose a functional form for the model potential, for example, the Lennard-Jones 12-6 potential ... [Pg.241]

This first requires that one choose a functional form of f(y) so that its integral can be determined for use in eq n. (21). Then a value of Z is guessed and P(y) is calculated for arbitrary values of y and 8. This allows Z to be computed from eq n. (17) and its value is then compared with the one guessed. The procedure is repeated until convergence is obtained. Since these values of P(y) and Z are obtained for arbitrary values of y and 8, a master plot can be constructed and used in a very general fashion. Such... [Pg.32]

At this point one must choose a functional form for Ne (x). This choice is based on what is known about the physical description of the system. Several appropriate functions have been described in the literature, a choice which has met with considerable success being the following [30] ... [Pg.541]

Expressions that are not exact can only be integrated after making them exact, and this is done by choosing a functional relationship between x and y, i.e., by making... [Pg.16]

The function vectors in Eq. 5.22 are analogous to the conductivity eigenvectors. If we choose a function space in which a physical property... [Pg.63]

Corollary 1. Choose a functional monomer that has one or more binding interactions with the template. [Pg.408]

Observing the above equation, we note that measuring the time lag does not necessarily provide us with the information about the functional form of the diffusion coefficient. This is usually what we would like to obtain for a given system. One could, however, choose a functional form for D containing one or more parameters, and then by measuring the time lags at various values of the concentration of the supply reservoir we can do a nonlinear optimisation to extract those parameters for the assumed functional form of the diffusion coefficient. [Pg.722]

Analysis We note that there are seven carbons in the product and only two in acetylene. We will need to construct the carbon skeleton through carbon-carbon bond formation with haloalkanes totaling five carbon atoms. The functional group in the target molecule is a ketone, which we can prepare by hydration of a carbon-carbon triple bond. Hydration of 1-heptyne gives only 2-heptanone, whereas hydration of 2-heptyne gives a mixture of 2-heptanone and 3-heptanone. Therefore, we choose a functional group interconversion via 1-heptyne. [Pg.325]

There have been many proposals for the distribution functions of extreme wave heights. The current consensus is to choose a function best fitting to the extreme wave data among several candidates, which include the Fisher-Tippett type I (FT-I), Fisher Tippett type II (FT-II), and WeibuU distributions. A difficulty in selecting a distribution function best fitting to a data set of storm wave heights is the lack of information on the population distribution of extreme events. [Pg.1046]

There are five ways to choose a function for each position. Thus, the number of integrals is 2 x 5" = 1,250. [Pg.676]

One of the most standard approaches for curve fitting is the least squares method. The idea behind this method is that we choose a function with a number of embedded parameters. The function tends to "hit and miss" the data points, but we can adjust the embedded parameters to make it hit more than it misses. In the least squares method, the squares of the deviations of the data points from the curve given by our chosen function are summed. This value provides a measure of how well the function represents the data. It is this value that we seek to minimize through adjustment of the embedded parameters. In the end we will have found the parameter choices that give the least squares error. [Pg.418]

These methods are based on the concept of interpolation of unequally spaced points that is, choosing a function, usually a polynomial, that approximates the solution of a differential equation in the range of integration, Xq x < and determining the coefficients of that function from a set of base points. [Pg.323]


See other pages where Choosing a Functional is mentioned: [Pg.145]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.1837]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.1596]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.2296]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.2279]    [Pg.1841]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.1666]    [Pg.199]   


SEARCH



Choosing

© 2024 chempedia.info