Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Instrumentation transfer function analyzer

The experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 7-1 an electrochemical interface with low level noise and a transfer function analyzer (TFA) were used for measurements of the EHD impedance. A matched two-channels 24 db/octave low pass filter (F) was used to remove HF noise and the ripple due to electric network supply, this analog filtering allows the TFA to operate with an increased sensitivity. These instruments were controlled by a computer, which recorded the data. [Pg.261]

Standardization The instrument response function can vary from analyzer to analyzer. If calibration transfer is to be achieved across all instrument platforms it is important that the instrument function is characterized, and preferably standardized [31]. Also, at times it is necessary to perform a local calibration while the analyzer is still on-line. In order to handle this, it is beneficial to consider an on-board calibration/standardization, integrated into the sample conditioning system. Most commercial NIR analyzers require some form of standardization and calibration transfer. Similarly, modem FTIR systems include some form of instrument standardization, usually based on an internal calibrant. This attribute is becoming an important feature for regulatory controlled analyses, where a proper audit trail has to be established, including instrument calibration. [Pg.184]

Although it is common practice to analyze control loops in terms of the response of the controlled variable to changes in set point, the usual disturbances in process control systems occur at various points in the process rather than at points in the controlling instruments. No special techniques of analysis are required to determine the response of the controlled variable to disturbances applied anywhere in the loop. It is only necessary to manipulate the component transfer functions algebraically, until the ratio of controlled variable to disturbance is found. [Pg.70]

In this section we will analyze the ILIT response, i.e., just how the open-circuit potential depends upon temperature and upon the properties of the redox couple that is attached to the electrode surface. In Sec. IV.A we will focus on the ILIT response to a perfectly reversible electron-transfer. In Sec. IV.B we will essentially state the kinetic response when the change in the interfacial temperature is described by a step-function. In Secs. C and D we analyze the details of the actual change in the interfacial temperature, the instrument response function, and finally the extraction of the physical parameters from the experimental ILIT response. [Pg.120]

A more useful method of standardization would not require transfer samples to be analyzed. A general method based loosely on MSC has also demonstrated success when there are relatively minor performance differences between the original and second instruments [11,12]. Here a local selection of wavelengths from each spectrum are regressed against the mean spectrum to build a transfer function. Consequently, the spectra from the second instrument are not transformed to look like the spectra from the first instrument. Instead, spectral from both instruments are transformed to lie in a common multidimensional space. [Pg.214]

Steady-state empirical models can be used for instrument calibration, process optimization, and specific instances of process control. Single-input, single-output (SISO) models typically consist of simple polynomials relating an output to an input. Dynamic empirical models can be employed to understand process behavior during upset conditions. They are also used to design control systems and to analyze their performance. Empirical dynamic models typically are low-order differential equations or transfer function models (e.g., first-or second-order model, perhaps with a time delay), with unspecified model parameters to be determined from experimental data. However, in some situations more complicated models are valuable in control system design, as discussed later in this chapter. [Pg.115]

All impactor and filter samples were analyzed for up to 45 elements by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) as described by Heft ( ). Samples were irradiated simultaneously with standard flux monitors in the 3-MW Livermore pool reactor. The x-ray spectra of the radioactive species were taken with large-volume, high-resolution Ge(Li) spectrometer systems. The spectral data were transferred to a GDC 7600 computer and analyzed with the GAMANAL code (1 ), which incorporates a background-smoothing routine and fits the peaks with Gaussian and exponential functions. [Pg.177]

PTR-MS combines the concept of Cl with the swarm technique of the flow tube and flow-drift-tube mentioned above. In a PTR-MS instrument, we apply a Cl system which is based on proton-transfer reactions, and preferentially use HsO" " as the primary reactant ion. As discussed earlier, HsO" " is a most suitable primary reactant ion when air samples containing a wide variety of trace gases or VOCs are to be analyzed. HsO" " ions do not react with any of the natural components of air, as these have proton affinities lower than that of H2O molecules this is illustrated in Table 1. This table also shows that common VOCs containing a polar functional group or unsaturated bonds (e.g. alkenes, arenes) have proton affinities larger than that of H2O and therefore proton transfer occurs between H30" and any of these compounds (see Equation 4). The measured thermal rate constants for proton transfer to VOCs are nearly identical to calculated thermal, collisional limiting values (Table 1), illustrating that proton transfer occurs on every collision. [Pg.4]

A functionally similar dissociation method, electron transfer dissociation (ETD) was more recently reported (32), specifically for use on QIT instruments, although it is also beginning to be adapted to other mass analyzers. ETD is accomplished by electron transfer to the analyte from a negatively charged species that is produced in a chemical ionization source and directed into the region where the analyte ions are trapped. For peptides and proteins, it produces spectra that... [Pg.43]


See other pages where Instrumentation transfer function analyzer is mentioned: [Pg.182]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.1365]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.6311]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.6310]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.152]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.261 ]




SEARCH



Instrument function

Instrumentation Analyzer

Transfer function

Transfer function functions

Transference function

© 2024 chempedia.info