Innovation managing complexity

The reality of risk assessment in investment for new processes is somewhat more complex than this. The specific innovations are often not discrete and the confidence of success of each item is a probability distribution rather than a single value. Techniques to handle the mathematical aspects have been available for many years [61] and computational tools are now readily available. A detailed coverage of managing uncertainty is beyond the scope of the current text and this simplistic approach suffices to address the key question of how to effectively manage the N-and C-values. 

The economic framework conditions for hazardous substance substitution have thus also changed considerably in the course of the past twenty years. Many commodities are produced today in globally organised supply chains the origin, quality and application conditions of process chemicals and product components is complex. Developing appropriate management systems for product quality and product safety requires considerable organisational innovation by the companies involved. 

The unique properties of highly fluorinated materials are thus expected to continue inspire chemists, offer new research tools for the life sciences, and contribute to the emergence of new diagnostic and therapeutic innovations. Pharmaceutical development involves increasing complexity and heavy regulatory, financial, and other constraints, and time. Managing such complexity... 

Innovation as a process and the related research-and-development (R D) project management are considered to be two of the most complex information systems and engineering architectures due to the large number of attributes, processes, and dynamic changes projects go through during their life cycle. 

After this introduction, let us show our object-oriented system components, following the above described ISO 9000 2000 principles, and how we can model complex innovation and related project management processes using them [40-54]. 

Top managers often think IT infrastructure is the machines and cables in the basement. They are wrong. IT infrastructure has become a complex system that drives IT performance and accounts for over half of the IT budget (Fig. 23.3). On top of that is the complexity of assimilating innovations such as voice-over-IP, thin clients, IT security standards, blade servers, or Linux at a near-breakneck pace. 

The UK system of management appears to send mixed messages to stakeholders. The combination of lengthy stakeholder consultations, in-depth cost-benefit analyses, complex bureaucracy, and final decisions made at a political level appears to limit the incentive for companies taking beyond-compliance action or seeking innovative new solutions. A further result is that much of the responsibility becomes focussed on regulators and industry rather than a wider set of stakeholder associations (e.g., trade unions, occupational insurance companies). 

---