Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Incidence, 93 kinetic parameters

The writer studied the initiation of Pb Azide by high-intensity light (Ref 9b). He found that the process of initiation was thermal, with thermal expln occurring in a thin layer that was heated by absorbing most of the incident light. He was able to make estimates of the kinetic parameters of Pb Azide based on observed initiation delays and thermal expln theory... [Pg.679]

Figure 7 Plot of the initial chemisorption probability, S0, as a function of surface temperature, Ts for propane on the Ir(l 1 0)-(1 x 2) surface. All adsorption measurements were taken using propane with 50kcal/mol of incident translational energy. Theory points calculated using Eq. (3) and experimentally determined kinetic parameters (Ed — Ex = 11.1 l.OkJ/mol, vd/vT = 20 5). Uncertainty in sticking probability measurement is 0.02 Error in surface temperature measurement is 5 K. Data adapted from Soulen and Madix [13],... Figure 7 Plot of the initial chemisorption probability, S0, as a function of surface temperature, Ts for propane on the Ir(l 1 0)-(1 x 2) surface. All adsorption measurements were taken using propane with 50kcal/mol of incident translational energy. Theory points calculated using Eq. (3) and experimentally determined kinetic parameters (Ed — Ex = 11.1 l.OkJ/mol, vd/vT = 20 5). Uncertainty in sticking probability measurement is 0.02 Error in surface temperature measurement is 5 K. Data adapted from Soulen and Madix [13],...
The reasons for the differences between the results of Bratu and Hofer [73] and those of Kolasinski et al. [41] are presently unknown. Although Kolasinski et al. found a weak dependence of sticking on incident energy, the difference between beam dosing and exposure to an equilibrium gas can only account for a part of the difference between the sticking probabilities. The sensitivity of the SHG method, small error bars, and model-independent determination of kinetic parameters make the results of Bratu and Hofer appear more compelling at present. Clearly, additional tests of these results are needed. [Pg.29]

In addition to the hazards due to the toxic effects of chemicals, hazards due to flammability, explosibility, and reactivity need to be considered in risk assessment. These hazards are described in detail in the following sections. Further information can be found in Bretherick s Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards (Bretherick, 1990), an extensive compendium that is the basis for the lists of incompatible chemicals included in various reference works. Bretherick describes computational protocols that consider thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of a system to arrive at quantitative measures such as the Reaction Hazard Index (RHI). So-called "reactive" hazards arise when the release of energy from a chemical reaction occurs in quantities or at rates too great for the energy to be absorbed by the immediate environment of the reacting system, and material damage results. In addition, the "Letters to the Editor" column of Chemical Engineering News routinely reports incidents with explosive reaction mixtures or conditions. [Pg.52]

Classical ion trajectory computer simulations based on the BCA are a series of evaluations of two-body collisions. The parameters involved in each collision are tire type of atoms of the projectile and the target atom, the kinetic energy of the projectile and the impact parameter. The general procedure for implementation of such computer simulations is as follows. All of the parameters involved in tlie calculation are defined the surface structure in tenns of the types of the constituent atoms, their positions in the surface and their themial vibration amplitude the projectile in tenns of the type of ion to be used, the incident beam direction and the initial kinetic energy the detector in tenns of the position, size and detection efficiency the type of potential fiinctions for possible collision pairs. [Pg.1811]

FIGURE 1.17 When photons strike a metal, no electrons are ejected unless the incident radiation has a frequency above a value characteristic of the metal. The kinetic energy of the ejected electrons varies linearly with the frequency of the incident radiation. The inset shows the relation of the slope and the two intercepts to the parameters in Eq. 5. [Pg.136]

Numerous determinations of the heat of formation of carbon difluoride, a transient intermediate in the production of PTFE, for example, have been made. The most recent one has combined kinetic and equilibrium approaches. The equilibrium C2F4 2CF2 was studied at 1150-1600 K at 0.07-46 bar in dilute argon mixtures using incident and reflected shock waves. The carbene concentration was monitored at 250 nm after a careful study of the extinction coefficient over a wide temperature range. Rate parameters were found for forward and back... [Pg.30]

In all these models, knowledge of parameters such as q0 (LSPP model), E0 (PSSE model), or I0 and yL (LL model) are necessary to determine the photolysis rate of M. These parameters are determined experimentally by actinometry experiments [86]. It is noteworthy to mention that the use of these theoretical models (LSPP or PSSE models) implies that all radiation incident into the solution is absorbed without end effects, reflection, or refraction. In experimental photoreactors, it is not usual to fulfill all these assumptions because of the short wall distance of the photoreactor. For instance, to account for such deviations, Jacob and Dranoff [114] introduced a correcting equation, as a function of position. Another important disadvantage is the presence of bubbles that leads to a heterogeneous process as, for example, in the case of 03/UV oxidation. In this case, photoreactor models should be used [109]. This is the main reason for which the LL model is usually applied in the laboratory for the kinetic treatment of photochemical reactions. In the LLM,... [Pg.34]

The properties of the emitted material depend on the bombarding ions, their kinetic energy, incidence angle, atomic mass as well as on the target material and its structure. The most important parameter of the sputtering process is the so-called sputter yield Y which defines the number of emitted target atoms Ze per incident particles Z. ... [Pg.190]

The kinetics of the pyrolysis of CHC13 was determined behind incident and reflected shock waves at 1050-1600 K92. This decomposition was reported to be unimolecular and the process is an a,a-elimination CHC13 - CC12 + HC1. The Arrhenius parameters for this process are log A - 14.3, E = 228 kJmoT1. [Pg.1083]

The incident and reflected shock-wave technique was employed for a kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of /-butyl bromide110. The substrate dehydrobrominated even at the highest temperature of 1050 K via a unimolecular four-membered cyclic transition state. The A factor and the activation energy obtained in different investigations were compared and, because of the small temperature range in each individual study, these data were combined in order to estimate more reliable Arrhenius parameters between 500 K and 1050 K. Thus ... [Pg.1086]

Figure 4 Quasi-classical opacity function P(p), defined as the fraction of reactive trajectories for a given impact parameter, p (solid line). Also plotted is Krei, the component of the relative incident-target H atom kinetic energy parallel to the surface, following a non-reactive collision (dotted line). The results correspond to H-on-D for the flat-surface potential described in the text. Figure 4 Quasi-classical opacity function P(p), defined as the fraction of reactive trajectories for a given impact parameter, p (solid line). Also plotted is Krei, the component of the relative incident-target H atom kinetic energy parallel to the surface, following a non-reactive collision (dotted line). The results correspond to H-on-D for the flat-surface potential described in the text.
Here, q is the effective charge of the target as seen by the incident electron, n is the ionic parameter for the relevant orbit, and Xni is the kinetic energy of an electron in the relevant ionized orbit. While s i influences both the peak position and magnitude, qni controls only the magnitude. The KLV model of Kolbenstvedt [23] fixes ijls = 0.499 for the E-shell ionization, such that Nu r)ni = 0.998 with Nu = 2. The appropriate forms of the relativistic factor RF and the scaling factor FM, which are detailed in Ref. [50], are, respectively, given by... [Pg.327]

The implications of the versatile reaction mechanisms depicted in Figs. 7-1 to 7-4 are profound with respect to the complete understanding and hence to the kinetic modeling of AOPs. Despite the complexity of these photo-initiated reactions, it is possible to model AOPs with sufficient precision if all the rate constants of OH radical reactions involved and those of all other elementary reactions are known (Crittenden et al., 1999). Most importantly, the structures and the concentrations of all intermediary reaction products must be known. In addition, photoreactor specific parameters have to be included, such as the incident photon flow d>p and the dimensions of the irradiated volume. This task can be achieved for example... [Pg.191]


See other pages where Incidence, 93 kinetic parameters is mentioned: [Pg.185]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.200]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 , Pg.20 , Pg.23 , Pg.29 , Pg.30 , Pg.116 ]




SEARCH



Kinetic parameters

Kinetics parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info