In monolayers properties

Shorter chain analogs of DPPC were also investigated in order to determine if the lack of stereo-differentiation in monolayer properties could be due to DPPC s higher gel point or complicating steric effects. Figure 15 shows the compression/expansion isotherms of DPPC as compared with racemic and enantiomeric dimyristoylphosphatidyl choline (DMPC) and dilauroyl phosphatidyl choline (DLPC). Again no stereodifferentiation in monolayer properties was observed as reflected by 11/A isotherms or dynamic surface tension. 

The physical chemist is very interested in kinetics—in the mechanisms of chemical reactions, the rates of adsorption, dissolution or evaporation, and generally, in time as a variable. As may be imagined, there is a wide spectrum of rate phenomena and in the sophistication achieved in dealing wifli them. In some cases changes in area or in amounts of phases are involved, as in rates of evaporation, condensation, dissolution, precipitation, flocculation, and adsorption and desorption. In other cases surface composition is changing as with reaction in monolayers. The field of catalysis is focused largely on the study of surface reaction mechanisms. Thus, throughout this book, the kinetic aspects of interfacial phenomena are discussed in concert with the associated thermodynamic properties. 

Models of a second type (Sec. IV) restrict themselves to a few very basic ingredients, e.g., the repulsion between oil and water and the orientation of the amphiphiles. They are less versatile than chain models and have to be specified in view of the particular problem one has in mind. On the other hand, they allow an efficient study of structures on intermediate length and time scales, while still establishing a connection with microscopic properties of the materials. Hence, they bridge between the microscopic approaches and the more phenomenological treatments which will be described below. Various microscopic models of this type have been constructed and used to study phase transitions in the bulk of amphiphihc systems, internal phase transitions in monolayers and bilayers, interfacial properties, and dynamical aspects such as the kinetics of phase separation between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles. 

Polyimide-clay nanocomposites constitute another example of the synthesis of nanocomposite from polymer solution [70-76]. Polyimide-clay nanocomposite films were produced via polymerization of 4,4 -diaminodiphenyl ether and pyromellitic dianhydride in dimethylacetamide (DMAC) solvent, followed by mixing of the poly(amic acid) solution with organoclay dispersed in DMAC. Synthetic mica and MMT produced primarily exfoliated nanocomposites, while saponite and hectorite led to only monolayer intercalation in the clay galleries [71]. Dramatic improvements in barrier properties, thermal stability, and modulus were observed for these nanocomposites. Polyimide-clay nanocomposites containing only a small fraction of clay exhibited a several-fold reduction in the... 

Walter, E., Kissel, T., Reers, M., Dickneite, G., Hoffmann, D., Stuber, W., Transepithelial transport properties of peptidomimetic thrombin inhibitors in monolayers of a human intestinal cell line (Caco-2) and their correlation to in vivo data, Pharm. Res. 1995, 32, 360-365. 

The difference between the static or equilibrium and dynamic surface tension is often observed in the compression/expansion hysteresis present in most monolayer Yl/A isotherms (Fig. 8). In such cases, the compression isotherm is not coincident with the expansion one. For an insoluble monolayer, hysteresis may result from very rapid compression, collapse of the film to a surfactant bulk phase during compression, or compression of the film through a first or second order monolayer phase transition. In addition, any combination of these effects may be responsible for the observed hysteresis. Perhaps understandably, there has been no firm quantitative model for time-dependent relaxation effects in monolayers. However, if the basic monolayer properties such as ESP, stability limit, and composition are known, a qualitative description of the dynamic surface tension, or hysteresis, may be obtained. 

The implications for films cast from mixtures of enantiomers is that diagrams similar to those obtained for phase changes (i.e., melting point, etc.) versus composition for the bulk surfactant may be obtained if a film property is plotted as a function of composition. In the case of enantiomeric mixtures, these monolayer properties should be symmetric about the racemic mixture, and may help to determine whether the associations in the racemic film are homochiral, heterochiral, or ideal. Monolayers cast from non-enantiomeric chiral surfactant mixtures normally will not exhibit this feature. In addition, a systematic study of binary films cast from a mixture of chiral and achiral surfactants may help to determine the limits for chiral discrimination in monolayers doped with an achiral diluent. However, to our knowledge, there has never been any other systematic investigation of the thermodynamic, rheological and mixing properties of chiral monolayers than those reported below from this laboratory. 

Taken together, the equilibrium spreading pressures of films spread from the bulk surfactant, the dynamic properties of the films spread from solution, the shape of the Ylj A isotherms, the monolayer stability limits, and the dependence of all these properties on temperature indicate that the primary mechanism for enantiomeric discrimination in monolayers of SSME is the onset of a highly condensed phase during compression of the films. This condensed phase transition occurs at lower surface pressures for the R( —)- or S( + )-films than for their racemic mixture. 

Table 12 shows the equilibrium spreading pressures of each diacid. It is immediately apparent that for three of the diastereomeric pairs there are statistically significant differences. These distinctions relate stereochemical preferences in the spontaneous spreading of (+)- versus meso-monolayers in equilibrium with their respective crystalline phases. However, there appears to be no discernible trend in either the ( )- or meso-ESPs as a function of carbonyl position despite clear trends seen in their monolayer properties in the absence of any bulk crystalline phase. 

Since the laws of symmetry require that all properties of enantiomers (except their interactions with other chiral systems) be exactly the same, these studies have profited by the application of an absolute test for the presence of impurities, a perennial problem in monolayer research. In every case, all measurements were repeated with both enantiomers. Unless the results agreed within experimental error, the compounds were purified repeatedly until they did agree. 

For a number of the systems, comparisons were made between the effects of enantiomeric composition in the monolayer and corresponding melting-point-composition curves for the crystals. All of the latter gave clear evidence of racemic compound formation in the crystals, and this type of pattern was repeated in the monolayer properties. 

Interface, the air-water, chirality and molecular recognition in monolayers at, 28, 45 Intermediates, reactive, study of, by electrochemical methods, 19, 131 Intermediates, tetrahedral, derived from carboxylic acids, spectroscopic detection and investigation of their properties, 21, 37 Intramolecular reactions, effective molarities for, 17, 183 Intramolecular reactions, of chain molecules, 22, 1... 

---