Impact assessments mass balances

It is difficult to establish uniform guidelines for pharmacokinetic studies for biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals. Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, and tissue distribution studies in relevant species are useful however, routine studies that attempt to assess mass balance are not useful. Differences in pharmacokinetics among animal species may have a significant impact on the predictiveness of animal studies or on the assessment of dose response relationships in toxicity studies. Alterations in the pharmacokinetic profile due to immune-mediated clearance mechanisms may affect the kinetic profiles and the interpretation of the toxicity data. For some products there may also be inherent, significant delays in the expression of pharmacodynamic effects relative to the pharmacokinetic profile (e.g., cytokines) or there may be prolonged expression of pharmacodynamic effects relative to plasma levels. 

In this study we have employed the simultaneous collection of atmospheric particles and gases followed by multielement analysis as an approach for the determination of source-receptor relationships. A number of particulate tracer elements have previously been linked to sources (e.g., V to identify oil-fired power plant emissions, Na for marine aerosols, and Pb for motor vehicle contribution). Receptor methods commonly used to assess the interregional impact of such emissions include chemical mass balances (CMBs) and factor analysis (FA), the latter often including wind trajectories. With CMBs, source-strengths are determined (1) from the relative concentrations of marker elements measured at emission sources. When enough sample analyses are available, correlation calculations from FA and knowledge of source-emission compositions may identify groups of species from a common source type and identify potential marker elements. The source composition patterns are not necessary as the elemental concentrations in each sample are normalized to the mean value of the element. Recently a hybrid receptor model was proposed by Lewis and Stevens (2) in which the dispersion, deposition, and conversion characteristics of sulfur species in power-plant emissions... 

We first assessed the impact of internal diffusion limitations in the PGM layer. For this purpose a simulation study was performed progressively increasing the PGM washcoat thickness, from 10 pm up to 71 pm. From the analysis of NH3 concentration profiles a dramatic impact of dififiisional limitations was apparent indeed only the surface of this layer is effectively active due to the extremely high reactions rates of the PGM catalyst. For this reason, we developed a Layer -I- Surface Model (LSM) of dual-layer ASC where we treat the PGM layer as a surface, while we retain the rigorous description of coupled reaction/dififusion in the SCR layer, based on the previous ID -I- ID model of SCR monolithic converters [12,25,26]. Indeed, avoiding the description of diffusion phenomena in the PGM layer enables the direct inclusion of the PGM reactivity in the SCR converter model by simply modifying the inner boundary conditions of the species differential mass balances in the SCR layer, i.e., those now at the interface with the PGM phase. Treating the PGM layer as a surface thus enabled a simple extension of the ID -I- ID SCR converter model to simulate dual-layer catalytic systems too. 

A formal LCA comprises four steps goal definition and scoping, inventory analysis, impact assessment, and interpretation. Figure 2.6 illustrates the process with respect to a material or mass balance, omitting the components of energy balance. Each step is described briefly below [2,93,97,98] as it would be applied to a product or process rather than a service, and with a focus on mass inputs and outputs rather than energy, noise, or other considerations sometimes taken into account in LCA. 

The presented framework has been integrated with the sustainability and environmental impact assessment. Both sustainability and environmental impact analysis are performed using two in-honse software tools, SustainPro (Carvalho et al., 2013) and LCSoft (Kalakul et al., 2014), respectively. As a prerequisite for this step, some extra data are needed such as rigorous mass and energy balance, connectivity among the unit operations within the flowsheet, duty, and reaction data which are explained in more detail in the following text. 

---