Hydrophilic entity

If one examines the most potent and commonly used local anaesthetics in the therapeutic armamentarium it may be abimdantly clear that they essentially possess a tertiary alkylamine moiety which rapidly converts the base into the corresponding water-soluble salts with the various mineral acids. Obviously, the basic entity is frequently regarded as the hydrophilic entity of the drug molecule. 

---

The stabilizing function of macromolecular surfactants in solid-liquid systems is exercised through protective colloid action. To be effective, they must have a strong solution affinity for hydrophobic and hydrophilic entities. In liquid-liquid systems, surfactants are more accurately called emulsifiers. The same stabilizing function is exercised in gas-liquid disperse systems where the surfactants are called foam stabilizers. 

Table 19 also indicates some methods of decreasing the interfacial tension between water and heptane. The addition of a small amount of surfactant makes a significant difference. Similarly, ternary azeotropes formed by the addition of small amounts of n-propanol, butoxyethylene glycol, or other polar organics, also produce catalysts with high pore volumes, because the second organic, which contains both lipophilic and hydrophilic entities, can lower the interfacial tension between water and heptane. Some examples of this approach are also shown in Table 19. 

Secondly, particularly where bioassays are concerned, perhaps the greatest problem with MIPs is their low aqueous compatibility. Antibodies are hydrophilic entities that operate primarily in aqueous or polar environments, unlike most MIPs which are formed under non-polar conditions and are hydrophobic in nature. 

From Table 4.1. one may evidently observe that a entire moleeule of a local anaesthetic has been judiciously divided into three distinct compartments/zones, otherwise termed as lipophilic entity, intermediate chain and hydrophilic entity. However these three zones have been clearly illustrated in a few typical examples e.g., Lidocaine, Tetracaine, Butacaine, Procaine and a cholinergic agent Acetylcholine. 

ATo is the Pq/ distribution constant of A", the anionic form of AH. Eq. 9 clearly shows that the D value measured by CCC for an ionizable compound is not Po/w It is highly dependent on the pH and solutepK.. It was demonstrated that three measurements at three pH values around the pKa value allows the determination of the molecular Pq/w value of the solute as well as the Pq/w value of its corresponding anion. Even though the Pq/w values of the ions were always small as expected for such hydrophilic entities, they were not nil. CCC may be the only experimental method allowing estimation of the hydrophobicity of ions. ... 

The CER concept, applied to the cosurfactant properties of the monomer, explains the high values of HLBopt observed experimentally. Indeed, incorporating water-soluble monomers into microemulsions improves the chemical match between the aqueous phase and the surfactant hydrophilic entities. As an... 

Table 1 includes the contact angle values of deionized water (0 ) recorded on different samples. Each sample has been designated by a number from 1 to 5 whose notation is inserted in the title of Table 1. Based on the given data, sample 1 exhibits a hydrophobic characteristic which after being treated by plasma, an evident change in 0 arises and hydrophilicity ascends as anticipated. This trend continues as to sample 3 on which polyaciylic acid (PAA) chains are grafted where more hydrophilic propensity is shown inferred from 0 value. The elevated hydrophilicity upon multistep modifications is assumed to come from the inclusion of superficial hydrophilic entities. The hydrophilicity then decreases as polysaccharides are coated onto the surface, though is well higher than that of sample 1, as the inherent hydrophilicity of chitosan is beyond...

It is not always realized that hydrophobic interactions can quite readily take place between one hydrophobic and one hydrophilic molecule or particle, immersed in water, see Eq. 5.50. This is demonstrated in Table 8.2. Here the LW, the AB and the total interfacial (IF) free energies are shown of the interaction of polyethylene (PEO, which is one of the most hydrophilic materials known) with hydrophobic, mildly hydrophobic and hydrophilic entities. It clearly shows that, in water, PEO will bind to the more hydrophilic substrata (i.e., Teflon, octane, talc). PEO will not bind (in water) to the only slightly hydrophobic smectite, hectorite, and it is even more strongly repelled (on a macroscopic scale) by the very hydrophilic surfaces of muscovite and glass. It should be noted that these considerations only apply to interactions on a macroscopic level. Even when a macroscopic repulsion exists on a macro-... 

Table 8.3 shows a few examples of hydrophobic and hydrophilic entities. The defining value, AG, is clearly the most foolproof for neutral particles its sign indicates whether instability (AG < 0) or stability (AGJ > 0) of an aqueous suspension is favored, and in either case the value of Atf indicates the degree of instability or stability. The same holds true for the aqueous solubility of solutes (cf. Section 9.6). 

A fiirther step in coarse graining is accomplished by representing the amphiphiles not as chain molecules but as single site/bond entities on a lattice. The characteristic architecture of the amphiphile—the hydrophilic head and hydrophobic tail—is lost in this representation. Instead, the interaction between the different lattice sites, which represent the oil, the water and the amphiphile, have to be carefiilly constmcted in order to bring about the amphiphilic behaviour. 

Apart from fatty acids, straight-chain molecules containing other hydrophilic end groups have been employed in numerous studies. In order to stabilize LB films chemical entities such as tlie alcohol group and tlie metliyl ester group have been introduced, botli of which are less hydrophilic tlian carboxylic acids and are largely unaffected by tlie pH of tlie subphase. 

In highly diluted solutions the surfactants are monodispersed and are enriched by hydrophil-hydrophobe-oriented adsorption at the surface. If a certain concentration which is characteristic for each surfactant is exceeded, the surfactant molecules congregate to micelles. The inside of a micelle consists of hydrophobic groups whereas its surface consists of hydrophilic groups. Micelles are dynamic entities that are in equilibrium with their surrounded concentration. If the solution is diluted and remains under the characteristic concentration, micelles dissociate to single molecules. The concentration at which micelle formation starts is called critical micelle concentration (cmc). Its value is characteristic for each surfactant and depends on several parameters [189-191] ... 

In almost all theoretical studies of AGf , it is postulated or tacitly understood that when an ion is transferred across the 0/W interface, it strips off solvated molecules completely, and hence the crystal ionic radius is usually employed for the calculation of AGfr°. Although Abraham and Liszi [17], in considering the transfer between mutually saturated solvents, were aware of the effects of hydration of ions in organic solvents in which water is quite soluble (e.g., 1-octanol, 1-pentanol, and methylisobutyl ketone), they concluded that in solvents such as NB andl,2-DCE, the solubility of water is rather small and most ions in the water-saturated solvent exist as unhydrated entities. However, even a water-immiscible organic solvent such as NB dissolves a considerable amount of water (e.g., ca. 170mM H2O in NB). In such a medium, hydrophilic ions such as Li, Na, Ca, Ba, CH, and Br are selectively solvated by water. This phenomenon has become apparent since at least 1968 by solvent extraction studies with the Karl-Fischer method [35 5]. Rais et al. [35] and Iwachido and coworkers [36-39] determined hydration numbers, i.e., the number of coextracted water molecules, for alkali and alkaline earth metal... 

Another way for covalent immobilisation is to synthesise indicator chemistry with polymerizable entities such as methacrylate groups (Figure 4). These groups can then be copolymerized with monomers such as hydrophobic methyl methacrylate or hydrophilic acryl amide to give sensor copolymers. In order to obtain self-plasticized materials, methacrylate monomers with long alkyl chains (hexyl or dodecyl methacrylate) can be used. Thus, sensor copolymers are obtained which have a Tg below room temperature. Similarly, ionophores and ionic additives (quaternary ammonium ions and borates) can be derivatised to give methacrylate derivatives. 

The heterobifunctional PEGs are very useful in linking two entities in cases where a hydrophilic, flexible, and biocompatible spacer is needed. Preferred end groups for heterobifunctional PEGs are maleimides, vinyl sulfones, pyridyl disulfides, amines, carboxylic acids, and /V-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters. 

The h-pH diagrams of surface oxidation of arsenopyrite and pyrite are shown in Fig. 2.16 and Fig. 2.17, respectively. Figure 2.16 shows that jBh-pH area of self-induced collectorless flotation of arsenopyrite is close to the area forming sulphur. The reactions producing elemental sulphur determine the lower limit potential of flotation. The reactions producing thiosulphate and other hydrophilic species define the upper limit of potential. In acid solutions arsenopyrite demonstrates wider potential region for collectorless flotation, but almost non-floatable in alkaline environment. It suggests that the hydrophobic entity is metastable elemental sulphur. However, in alkaline solutions, the presence of... 

---