Hydroperoxides radicals from

The reaction I is to a certain extent analogous to the reaction of hydrogen atom abstraction by the peroxide ot hydroperoxide radicals from the hydrocarbons ... 

Radical from the corresponding hydroperoxide. Radical from the corresponding hydrocarbon. 

Products other than hydroperoxides are formed in oxidations by reactions such as those of equations 11 and 12. Hydroxyl radicals (from eq. 4) are very energetic hydrogen abstractors the product is water (eq. 11). 

Most solvents for hydroperoxides are not completely inert to radical attack and, consequendy, react with radicals from the hydroperoxide to form solvent-derived radicals, either by addition to unsaturated sites or by hydrogen- or chlorine-atom abstraction. In equation 15, S—H represents solvent and S is a solvent radical. 

Alkoxy radicals from hydroperoxides can undergo a -scission reaction (eq. 2) to yield an alkyl radical and a ketone. The higher stabiUty of the generated alkyl radical compared to that of the parent alkoxy radical provides the driving force for this reaction, and the R group involved is the one that forms the most stable alkyl radical. 

Metal Deactivators. The abiUty of metal ions to catalyse oxidation can be inhibited by metal deactivators (19). These additives chelate metal ions and increase the potential difference between the oxidised and reduced states of the metal ions. This decreases the abiUty of the metal to produce radicals from hydroperoxides by oxidation and reduction (eqs. 15 and 16). Complexation of the metal by the metal deactivator also blocks its abiUty to associate with a hydroperoxide, a requirement for catalysis (20). 

The mechanoradical produced will react with the small amount of oxygen to form hydroperoxides these are subsequently utilised as radical generators in the second stage. The resulting hydroxyl radical (from hydroperoxide decomposition) abstracts a hydrogen from the substrate to form macroradical which, in turn, will react with more of the thiyl radical to form more bound antioxidant. The polymer bound antioxidant made in this way is very much more resistant to solvent leaching and volatilisation when compared to commercial additives (13). see Figure 2. 

In heterogeneous domains of oxidized PP, terminal dioxetane groups may be formed from 1,3-peroxyl hydroperoxides radicals in the sequence of reactions depicted in Scheme 7. 

If radicals are produced in the reactions of unimolecular hydroperoxide decomposition and the reaction of ROOH with hydrocarbon whose concentration at the initial stages of oxidation is virtually constant, the production of radicals from ROOH can be regarded as a pseudo-monomolecular process occurring at the rate V = [ROOH] = + iRH[RH]). The... 

Another factor complicating the situation in composition of peroxyl radicals propagating chain oxidation of alcohol is the production of carbonyl compounds due to alcohol oxidation. As a result of alcohol oxidation, ketones are formed from the secondary alcohol oxidation and aldehydes from the primary alcohols [8,9], Hydroperoxide radicals are added to carbonyl compounds with the formation of alkylhydroxyperoxyl radical. This addition is reversible. 

These data appeared to be very useful for the estimation of the relative O H bond dissociation energies in hydroperoxides formed from peroxyl radicals of oxidized ethers. All reactions of the type R02 + RH (RH is hydrocarbon) are reactions of the same class (see Chapter 6). All these reactions are divided into three groups RO + R (alkane, parameter bre = 13.62 (kJ moC1)172, R02 + R2H (olefin, bre = 15.21 (kJ mob1)1 2, and R02 + R3H (akylaromatic hydrocarbon), hrc 14.32 (kJ mol )12 [71], Only one factor, namely reaction enthalpy, determines the activation energy of the reaction inside one group of reactions. Also,... 

The kinetic study of cumyl hydroperoxide decomposition in emulsion showed that (a) hydroperoxide decomposes in emulsion by 2.5 times more rapidly than in cumene (368 K, [RH] [H20] = 2 3 (v/v), 0.1 N Na2C03) and (b) the yield of radicals from the cage in emulsion is higher and close to unity [19]. The activation energy of ROOH decomposition in cumene is Ed = 105 kJ mol-1 and in emulsion it is lower and equals Ed 74 kJ mol 1 [17]. 

The concurrent slow homolytic reaction gives rise to free radicals [14]. The occurrence of the homolytic reaction can be revealed by the consumption of free radical acceptors [8,15], CL [16], or NMR spectroscopy [17,18]. The introduction of phosphite into the hydroperoxide-containing cumene causes an initiation, pro-oxidative effect related to the formation of free radicals [6]. The yield of radicals from aliphatic phosphites is much lower (0.01-0.02%) than that from aromatic phosphites (up to 5%) [17]. The homolytic reaction of phosphites with hydroperoxide has a higher activation energy than the heterolytic reaction, which results in the predominance of the former reaction at elevated temperatures. 

On the other hand, the formation of radicals from hydroperoxides and ferrous ion is a reduction reaction apparently uncomplicated by any catalytic effect of the ferric ion produced.462... 

FIGURE 6 Speculative mechanism of Crl hydrocarbon biosynthesis from fatty acid hydroperoxides in algae. Homolytic cleavage of the hydroperoxide is assumed to give an allyl radical, which cyclizes to the thermolabile (1S,2R)-cyclopropane. The sequence is terminated by transfer of a hydrogen radical from C(16) to the -X-0 function. The cyclopropane rearranges to (6S)-ectocarpene as shown in Figure 4. 

The Cu+ catalyzes the formation of radicals from the cumene hydroperoxide, which then begins the polymerization of the TEGMA and TEGMA molecules with only one reactive end (Figure 19.7). Those with two active ends result in the formation of cross-linked materials. A similar reaction occurs with iron and several metals such as zinc, gold, silver, cadmium, magnesium, titanium, and alloys that contain any of these metals. 

There are no available data on the formation of hydroperoxides derived from DNA within cells. This is likely explained, at least partly, by the fact that DNA is a poorer target than proteins for OH radical as observed upon exposure of mouse myeloma cells to ionizing radiation . However, indirect evidence for DNA peroxidation within cells may be inferred from the measurement of final degradation products that may derive from thymine and guanine hydroperoxidation as the result of oxidation reactions mediated by OH radical and O2, respectively (Sections n.A.2 and n.E.2). It may be pointed out that the measurement of oxidized bases and nucleosides within DNA has been the subject of intense research during the last decade and accurate methods are now available . This includes DNA extraction that involves the chaotropic Nal precipitation step and the use of desferrioxamine to chelate transition metals in order to prevent spurious oxidation of overwhelming nucleobases to occur . HPLC coupled to electrospray ionization... 

In developing oxidation processes a major source of free radical formation was found to be degenerate chain branching. Among the products derived from the branching were intermediate peroxides ROOH. Formation of radicals from the hydroperoxides proceeded not only by monomolecular breakdown of hydroperoxides ... 

At Van Sickle s conditions of low temperatures and low conversions, branching routes A and B appear to be dominant since there is little alkenyl hydroperoxide decomposition. In our work above 100°C., the branching routes are supported by the nearly linear initial portions at low conversions for alkenyl hydroperoxide and polymeric dialkyl peroxide curves (see Figures 2, 3, and 4). The polymeric dialkyl peroxides formed under our reaction conditions include those formed by the branching mechanism postulated by Van Sickle (routes A and B) and those formed by the reaction of the alkenoxy and hydroxy radicals from alkenyl hydroperoxide thermal decomposition reacting further and alternately with olefin and oxygen (step C). The importance and kinetic fit of the sequential route A to C appears to increase with temperature and extent of olefin conversion owing to the extensive thermal decomposition of the alkenyl hydroperoxides above 100°C. 

The direct reaction of oxygen with the carbanion from dihydroanthracene does not seem likely. Russell (5) has indicated a preference for a one-electron transfer process to convert the carbanion to a free radical, which then reacts with oxygen to form an oxygenated species. Therefore, we considered a mechanism involving one-electron transfer to form a free radical from the carbanion, which would lead to the formation of anthraquinone and anthracene without having either the hydroperoxide or anthrone as an intermediate. 

The biperoxy radical produced by the ceric ion oxidation of 2,5-di-methylhexane-2,5-dihydroperoxide decays rapidly with first-order kinetics [k = ioio.e exp( -11,500 1000)/RT sec.1 = 180 sec."1 at 30°C. (30)]. After the first-order decay has run to completion, there is a residual radical concentration (—4% of the initial hydroperoxide concentration) which decays much more slowly by a second-order process. The residual second-order reaction cannot be eliminated or changed even by repeated recrystallization of the dihydroperoxide. This suggests that a small fraction of the biperoxy radicals react intermolecularly rather than by an intramolecular process and thus produce monoperoxy radicals. The bimolecular decay constant for this residual species of peroxy radical is similar to that found for the structurally similar radical from 1,1,3,3-tetra-methylbutyl hydroperoxide. Photolysis of the dihydroperoxide gave radicals with second-order decay kinetics which are presumed to be 2,5-hydroperoxyhexyl-5-peroxy radicals. 

---