Hydrogen Network Optimization

While preparing the optimization software, we first set up a superstmeture that connects every sink with every source, provided that the source pressure is greater than or equal to the sink pressure. Compressors are included as both sources and sinks. We formulate basic constraints such as balances on total flow rate and hydrogen flow rate, as well as any compressor limitations such as maximum power or maximum throughput. A whole host of other constraints can also be incorporated, such as limited space, no new compressors allowed, and the old favorite I don t want to spend any capital  

The ability to add constraints at will means that all practical considerations can be built in. The cost of adding a constraint can also be determined. For 

Another issue with purifiers is that different technologies have very different pressure requirements. A PSA unit gives a product pressure very close to the feed pressure, but the PSA residue pressure is extremely low. On the other hand, a membrane requires a large pressure drop in order to perform properly, the product pressure is much lower than the feed pressure, and the residue pressure is almost the same as the feed pressure. These issues need to be considered in the specific context of the refinery and can be handled easily using the approach described above. Ultimately, economics should determine the optimum trade-off between product purity, product pressure and hydrogen recovery. 

Purification expertise also saves time. Hydrogen network analysis experts work in parallel with purification experts to rapidly assess options and develop a project flow sheet. This is much more time-effective than having one company generate a small number of options using Pinch analysis and then sending the options to another company for cost quotes. With the parallel approach, more options are evaluated in less time, and both the network analysis engineers and the purification engineers see the entire picture. 

There is only spaee on the site for one new compressor and one new purifieation unit. 

---

Well, it s my conclusion based on the available data. And it s not uniquely my conclusion, either. A number of other scientists have already made the point that the only general conclusion that can be drawn is that there are many different ways to stabilize a protein. Two papers of note that emphasize this are by Daniel, Dines, and Petach, who state that there is currently no strong evidence that any particular interaction... plays a more important role in proteins that are stable at 100°C than in those stable at 50°C, and by Jaenicke and Bohm, who conclude that proteins are individuals that accumulate increments of stabilization in thermophiles these come from charge clusters, networks of hydrogen bonds, optimization of packing and hydrophobic interactions, each in its own way. ... 

Selection of an active-site model almost always leads to truncations of the hydrogen-bond network. Upon optimization of the active-site structure, this may lead to the formation of artificial hydrogen bonds that disrupt the structure. Freezing selected coordinates in the active-site model can prevent some of these hydrogen bonds to form. Another remedy could be to include more residues around the metal center, but larger QM models are much more expensive and there will probably still be truncated hydrogen bonds, although further away from the reaction center. 

Calculations of optimal hydrogen bonding and hydrogen bond networks... 

---