Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Current efficiency hydrogen

Analysis of the chlorine flows shows that the anode current efficiency is different from the cathode current efficiency. The current efficiency commonly used in discussing membrane cells is the caustic current efficiency, determined by the amount of hydroxide ion lost by leakage through the membranes into the anolyte. The hydrogen current efficiency, on the other hand, is nearly 100%. In other words, the electrode process is nearly quantitative, but the membranes allow some of the product of electrolysis to escape. [Pg.456]

The standard electrode potential for zinc reduction (—0.763 V) is much more cathodic than the potential for hydrogen evolution, and the two reactions proceed simultaneously, thereby reducing the electrochemical yield of zinc. Current efficiencies slightly above 90% are achieved in modem plants by careful purification of the electrolyte to bring the concentration of the most harmful impurities, eg, germanium, arsenic, and antimony, down to ca 0.01 mg/L. Addition of organic surfactants (qv) like glue, improves the quaUty of the deposit and the current efficiency. [Pg.174]

Selectivity of propylene oxide from propylene has been reported as high as 97% (222). Use of a gas cathode where oxygen is the gas, reduces required voltage and eliminates the formation of hydrogen (223). Addition of carbonate and bicarbonate salts to the electrolyte enhances ceU performance and product selectivity (224). Reference 225 shows that use of alternating current results in reduced current efficiencies, especiaHy as the frequency is increased. Electrochemical epoxidation of propylene is also accompHshed by using anolyte-containing silver—pyridine complexes (226) or thallium acetate complexes (227,228). [Pg.141]

The low current efficiency of this process results from the evolution of hydrogen at the cathode. This occurs because the hydrogen deposition overvoltage on chromium is significantly more positive than that at which chromous ion deposition would be expected to commence. Hydrogen evolution at the cathode surface also increases the pH of the catholyte beyond 4, which may result in the precipitation of Cr(OH)2 and Cr(OH)2, causing a partial passivation of the cathode and a reduction in current efficiency. The latter is also inherently low, as six electrons are required to reduce hexavalent ions to chromium metal. [Pg.119]

A side stream from the cathode product mixture is passed over a room temperature alumina bed to remove HF. The nitrogen/hydrogen ratio is estimated, and from this ratio and the known flow rate of the nitrogen reference stream, the current efficiency for hydrogen production is calculated. [Pg.535]

Over the range of 100 to 600 mA cm"2, the current efficiency for the production of hydrogen was 100%, with a standard deviation of 2%. Over the range of 100 to 600 mA cm-2, the current efficiency for the production of fluorine was 100% with a standard deviation of 2%. Essentially the same results were obtained with helium reference flows. [Pg.536]

The anode potential is so positive, due principally to the activation overpotential, that the majority of the impurity metals (Fe, Cu, Co, etc.) in the anode dissolve with the nickel sulfide. In addition, some oxygen is evolved (2 H20 = 02 + 4 H+ + 4 e ). The anodic current efficiency reduced to about 95% on account of this reaction. Small amounts of selenium and the precious metals remain undissolved in the anode slime along with sulfur. The anolyte contains impurities (Cu, Fe, Co) and, due to hydrogen ion (H+) liberation, it has a low pH of 1.9. The electrolyte of this type is highly unfit for nickel electrowinning. It is... [Pg.723]

Fig. 3. Current efficiency for hydrogen separation. Calculated overall energy efficiency vs. current density of hydrogen purification for conditions of Table 1 including reversible work O excluding reversible work. Fig. 3. Current efficiency for hydrogen separation. Calculated overall energy efficiency vs. current density of hydrogen purification for conditions of Table 1 including reversible work O excluding reversible work.
Rhodium and ruthenium complexes have also been studied as effective catalysts. Rh(diphos)2Cl [diphos = l,2-bis(diphenyl-phosphino)ethane] catalyzed the electroreduction of C02 in acetonitrile solution.146 Formate was produced at current efficiencies of ca. 20-40% in dry acetonitrile at ca. -1.5 V (versus Ag wire). It was suggested that acetonitrile itself was the source of the hydrogen atom and that formation of the hydride HRh(diphos)2 as an active intermediate was involved. Rh(bpy)3Cl3, which had been used as a catalyst for the two-electron reduction of NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) to NADH by Wienkamp and Steckhan,147 has also acted as a catalyst for C02 reduction in aqueous solutions (0.1 M TEAP) at -1.1 V versus SCE using Hg, Pb, In, graphite, and n-Ti02 electrodes.148 Formate was the main... [Pg.378]

The composition of the codeposition bath is defined not only by the concentration and type of electrolyte used for depositing the matrix metal, but also by the particle loading in suspension, the pH, the temperature, and the additives used. A variety of electrolytes have been used for the electrocodeposition process including simple metal sulfate or acidic metal sulfate baths to form a metal matrix of copper, iron, nickel, cobalt, or chromium, or their alloys. Deposition of a nickel matrix has also been conducted using a Watts bath which consists of nickel sulfate, nickel chloride and boric acid, and electrolyte baths based on nickel fluoborate or nickel sulfamate. Although many of the bath chemistries used provide high current efficiency, the effect of hydrogen evolution on electrocodeposition is not discussed in the literature. [Pg.199]

The intermittent operation of electrolyzers powered from a wind turbine is characterized by a dynamic power fluctuation with periods of varying overload, partial load, and shutdown. The operation of the electrolyzer below 10% of its nominal power remarkably reduced the current efficiency and the purity of the product gases, inducing the shutdown of the electrolyzer, which was programmed at a safety limit of 2 vol% hydrogen-in-oxygen [52],... [Pg.178]

If there are no detrimental organic side reactions, a cell current density in excess of the limiting current density - and as result a loss of current efficiency - may be acceptable for laboratory scale experiments. For example, a hydrogen evolution parallel to an electroorganic cathodic reduction can even be advantageous as it improves the mass transfer by moving gas bubbles and thus enhances the organic cathodic reduction. [Pg.34]


See other pages where Current efficiency hydrogen is mentioned: [Pg.1786]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.1786]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.705]    [Pg.567]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 ]




SEARCH



Current efficiency

Hydrogen efficiency

© 2024 chempedia.info