Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrodynamics asymmetry

The permeability coefficients, PD and PR, are influenced by hydrodynamics. Depending upon the geometric symmetry or asymmetry of stirring in the donor and receiver chambers, their values may be equal or unequal. To analyze these situations, let us define PAm, as the effective permeability coefficient of the ABLs therefore, the geometric average of the mass transfer resistance of the ABLs is... [Pg.255]

The plan of this chapter is the following. Section II gives a summary of the phenomenology of irreversible processes and set up the stage for the results of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics to follow. In Section III, it is explained that time asymmetry is compatible with microreversibility. In Section IV, the concept of Pollicott-Ruelle resonance is presented and shown to break the time-reversal symmetry in the statistical description of the time evolution of nonequilibrium relaxation toward the state of thermodynamic equilibrium. This concept is applied in Section V to the construction of the hydrodynamic modes of diffusion at the microscopic level of description in the phase space of Newton s equations. This framework allows us to derive ab initio entropy production as shown in Section VI. In Section VII, the concept of Pollicott-Ruelle resonance is also used to obtain the different transport coefficients, as well as the rates of various kinetic processes in the framework of the escape-rate theory. The time asymmetry in the dynamical randomness of nonequilibrium systems and the fluctuation theorem for the currents are presented in Section VIII. Conclusions and perspectives in biology are discussed in Section IX. [Pg.85]

The source of this 43% difference between the dry radius and the hydrodynamic radius is unlikely to be the increase in diameter due to bound water. It is more likely that the shape asymmetry of the enzyme (i.e., the approximation that the enzyme is effectively spherical) is the source of the above difference. ... [Pg.240]

These results make it clear that the forms of t]0 — rjs and Je° are completely independent of model details. Only the numerical coefficient of Je° contains information on the properties of the model, and even then the result depends on both molecular asymmetry and flexibility. Furthermore, polydispersity effects are the same in all such free-draining models. The forms from the Rouse theory cany over directly, so that t]0 - t]s, translated to macroscopic terms, is proportional to Mw and Je° is proportional to the factor A/2M2+, /A/w. Unfortunately, no such general analysis has been made for models with intramolecular hydrodynamic interaction, and of course these results apply in principle only to cases where intermolecular interactions are negligible. [Pg.36]

All factors related to the arrangement of the polymer chain in space are classified as tertiary structure. Parameters measurable directly (the radius of gyration RG, the end-to end distance h, the hydrodynamical radius RH, and the asymmetry in light scattering intensity) or indirectly (interaction parameters, the second virial coefficient A2) are related to the dimensions, such as size and shape of the polymer chain in a specific solvent under given conditions of temperature and pressure. For the exact determination of the coil size of macromolecules, it is necessary to ensure that measure-... [Pg.131]

The rotational diffusion constant in water at 25° and neutral pH as measured by electric birefringence (258) is 230 X 105 sec-1 or 0.73 X HT8 sec as a relaxation time. For a hydrodynamic ellipsoid of dimensions 66 X 22 A and a molecular weight of 14,000, the calculated relaxation tilde is 0.72 X 10-8 sec. However, the apparent asymmetry of the molecule from the X-ray structure corresponds to an axial ratio of no more than 2 1 rather than 3 1. [Pg.708]

Hydrodynamic mechanisms are those which produce particle interactions through the surrounding fluid due to hydrodynamic forces and the asymmetry of the flow field around each particle. These mechanisms, which are not dependent on the relative differences in acoustic particle entrainments, can act from distances larger than the acoustic displacement and have to be considered as the main mechanism in the agglomeration of monodispersed aerosols, where particles are equally entrained. There are two main types of hydrodynamic mechanisms, namely mutual radiation pressure [50] and the acoustic wake effect [51,52]. The radiation pressure is a second-order effect which produces a force on a particle immersed in an acoustic field due to the transfer of momentum from the acoustic wave to the particle. This force moves the particles towards the pressure node or antinode planes of the applied standing wave, depending on the size and density of the particles. The mutual radial pressure can be computed from the primary wave as well as from other wave fields of nearby scatters. In fact, it gives rise to particle interactions as the result of forces produced on two adjacent particles by a non-linear combination of incident and scattered waves. [Pg.154]

Two-fluid simulations have also been performed to predict void profiles (Kuipers et al, 1992b) and local wall-to-bed heat transfer coefficients in gas fluidized beds (Kuipers et al., 1992c). In Fig. 18 a comparison is shown between experimental (a) and theoretical (b) time-averaged porosity distributions obtained for a 2D air fluidized bed with a central jet (air injection velocity through the orifice 10.0 m/s which corresponds to 40u ). The experimental porosity distributions were obtained with the aid of a nonintrusive light transmission technique where the principles of liquid-solid fluidization and vibrofluidization were employed to perform the necessary calibration. The principal differences between theory and experiment can be attributed to the simplified solids rheology assumed in the hydrodynamic model and to asymmetries present in the experiment. [Pg.291]

In this review we have briefly discussed the theoretical and experimental aspects of both Newtonian and non-Newtonian viscosities of polymer solutions. To protein chemists one of the interesting developments is no doubt the re-examination of the (Newtonian) viscosity treatments of protein solutions. There are many assumptions involved in the effective use of intrinsic viscosity measurements for evaluating the asymmetry of the protein molecules, however attractive the conventional treatment may have appeared for the past two decades. Carefully interpreted, the intrinsic viscosity (at zero gradient) can still provide a reasonable estimate of the axial ratios of the protein molecules. The concept of equivalent hydrodynamic volume, sound in principle, has put the viscometry of protein solutions in a proper perspective, although the quantitative aspects of this new approach still... [Pg.388]

The excellent correlation between hydrodynamic volume and [ri]M) has become the basis of the universal calibration curve (UCC) for polymers. Although other size parameters, namely those dependent on Rg, have been suggested, the applicability of UCC has recently been verified for a variety of polymers including those with a high chemical and molecular weight asymmetry (e.g., miktoarm stars where arms are of different composition). ... [Pg.259]

Mellon D, Humphrey JAC (2007) Directional asymmetry in responses of local intemeurons in the crayfish deutocerebrum to hydrodynamic stimulation of the lateral antennular flagellum. J Exp Biol 210 2961-2968... [Pg.145]

The differences between Pitts (P) and Fuoss-Onsager (F-O) are first, the above mentioned omission by F-O of the effect of asymmetric potential on the local velocities of the solvent near the ions second, the use of the more usual boundary conditions 5.2.28b by F-O compared to the P assumption that perturbations cease to be important at r = a. Pitts, Tabor and Daly, who have analysed in detail both treatments, concluded that the discrepancy due to the different boundary conditions is small but has the effect of reducing ionic interactions in the P treatment with respect to the F-O. This is confirmed by the analysis of data with both theories. Usually P requires a smaller value of the a parameter than F-O. The third discrepancy between the theoretical treatments is in the expression of Vj, in eqn. 5.2.5, for which F-O add a term which involves the effect of the asymmetry of the ionic atmosphere upon the central ion surrounded by such atmosphere. The last difference lies in the hydrodynamic approaches and the corresponding boundary conditions. P imposes the condition that the velocity of the smoothed... [Pg.540]

When the sphere is solvated, the radius, r sphere, iS replaced by the hydrodynamically effective radius, r. In addition, deviations from spherical shape can be described by an asymmetry factor fA =/d//sphere. Thus, the coefficient of friction of a solvated particle of any given shape is given by... [Pg.255]

The diffusion coefficient D (at c 0) is related to the frictional coefficient /d [see equation (7-21). The coefficient fjy and, thus, D depend on a series of molecular quantities, as can be seen from the following reasoning. According to Stokes law, the frictional coefficient /sphere of an unsolvated sphere of homogeneous density is /sphere = Tif/iTsphere where is the solvent viscosity. In a solvated sphere, the hydrodynamically effective radius takes the place of the radius Tsphere- The deviation of the particle shape from that of an unsolvated sphere is described by an asymmetry factor /a = /nZ/sphere- Thus, the frictional coefficient fjj of a solvated particle of any given shape is, for c 0,... [Pg.256]

It is naive to correlate Kq directly with molecular weight because it is apparent that the relationship actually exists between the retention volume of a molecule and its hydrodynamic size rather than its molecular weight. The radius of a molecule in solution, relative to its molecular weight, is influenced by its degree of hydration, its molecular asymmetry, and, occasionally, its ionic and/or hydrophobic character. [Pg.51]

The second major variable determining the hydrodynamic volume of a molecule is its shape. The radius of gyration of a spherical polymer is less than that of a linear polymer of the same molecular weight. It can be seen in Fig. 5 that linear sulfonated polystyrenes (SPSs) do not penetrate the pores as much as globular proteins of the same molecular weight. Table 1 lists the radii of gyration for molecules with varying asymmetry. As the shape of the 500,000-Da model is... [Pg.53]

The preceding survey suggests that the binary mixture of GB fluid has not been studied so far by simulation or numerical methods although, as already mentioned, this is important because real systems are more likely to possess either size, shape, or interaction asymmetry, or any combination of them. The veriflcation of hydrodynamic relations is important for uncovering the nature of solute-solvent interactions in these more complex but model systems. This will certainly help to understand the composition dependence of the binary mixture of GB fluids. One expects in these studies a high degree of nonlinearity in composition dependence because asymmetric interaction-induced nonideal solution behavior has been observed for LJ mixtures of size-symmetric particles [22,23]. [Pg.22]


See other pages where Hydrodynamics asymmetry is mentioned: [Pg.281]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.6277]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.6276]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.63]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.86 , Pg.89 ]




SEARCH



Asymmetrie

Asymmetry

© 2024 chempedia.info