Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrocarbon conversion, deactivation coking

Although the reaction classes discussed earlier are sufficient to describe the hydrocarbon conversion kinetics, an understanding of the elementary reaction sequence is needed to describe catalyst deactivation. Several of the overall reactions require formation of olefinic intermediates in their elementary reaction sequence. Ultimately, these olefinic intermediates lead to coke formation and subsequent catalyst deactivation. For example, the ring closure reaction... [Pg.200]

In hydrocarbon conversion over zeolite catalysts, the formation and retention of heavy products (carbonaceous compounds often called coke ) is the main cause of catalyst deactivation. 5X 77 XI1 These carbonaceous compounds may poison or block the access of reactant molecules to the active sites. Moreover, their removal, carried out through oxidation treatment at high temperature, often causes a decrease in the number of accessible acid sites due to, e.g., zeolite dealumination or sintering of supported metals. [Pg.62]

Heterogeneous catalysts for hydrocarbon conversion may require metal sites for hydrogenation-dehydrogenation and acidic sites for isomerisation-cyclisation and these reactions may be more or less susceptible to the effect of carbonaceous overlayers depending on the size of ensembles of surface atoms necessary for the reaction. In reality we must expect species to be transferred and spilled-over between the various types of sites and if this transfer is sufficiently fast then it may affect the overall rate and selectivity observed. If there is spillover of a carbonaceous species [4] then there may be a common coke precursor for the carbonaceous overlayer on the two types of site. Nevertheless, the rate of deactivation of a metal site or an acidic site in isolation may be very different from the situation in which both types of site are present at a microscopic level on the same catalyst surface. The rate at which metal and acid sites deactivate with carbonaceous material may of course not be identical. Indeed metal sites may promote the re-oxidation of a carbonaceous species in TFO at a lower temperature than the acid sites would allow on their own and this may allow differentiation of the carbonaceous species held on the two types of site. [Pg.320]

Coking, widely experienced in the catalysis of hydrocarbon conversion (7), can deactivate both metallic and acid catalytic sites for hydrocarbon reactions (2). Accumulation of such carbonaceous deposits affects selectivity in hydrocarbon conversion (5). Adsorbed ethene even inhibits facile o-p-Hj conversion over Ni or Pt (4 ), the surface of which it appears is very nearly covered at lower temperatures in such deposits. H spillover may enhance hydrocarbonaceous residue formation (6). Accumulated carbonaceous residues can be removed by temperature programmed oxidation, reduction and hydrogenation TPO, TPR, TPH, etc (7) as part of catalyst regeneration. [Pg.91]

The objective of this book is to serve as a practical reference work on testing for the main hydrocarbon-conversion processes applied in oil refineries catalytic cracking, hydroprocessing, and reforming. These fields were combined because of the clear analogies and congruence between the areas, such as deactivation of active sites by coke, mass-transfer phenomena of hydrocarbons into solid catalysts, hydrocarbon chemistry and reaction kinetics, and downscaling of commercial conditions to realistic small-scale tests. [Pg.464]

Coke formation on the metallic surface can occur during the hydrocarbon conversion. The Pt and Pt-Au catalysts deactivates steadily at 623 K, and the catalytic decay followed the second order hyperbolic relation [5]. In order to make a more quantitative analysis of the deactivation... [Pg.423]

Methane CPO has been intensively studied to select new advanced catalysts able to maximize hydrocarbon conversion, hydrogen yield and especially to control catalytic deactivation phenomena, strictly connected to coke deposition problem, similar to SR process [18-23]. The role of transition metal-based catalysts in methane CPO reaction mechanism has been detailed [24], evidencing that fuel dissociation step is crucial for a viable overall process rate at reasonable temperatures, as expected taking into account the stability of methane molecule. [Pg.42]

Figure 11.19 shows the process flow sheet for a pilot-scale fluidized bed gasifier, capable of processing some 20 kg/h of biomass feed, coupled with a thermal cracker and reformer reactor. The reformer is loaded with fluidizable nickel-based reforming catalyst and fitted with gas analysis ports at its inlet and outlet. The system has been used to evaluate catalyst activity and the decay of hydrocarbon conversion with time from a slip stream sample of the raw fuel gas. In this way, it is possible to quantify the frequently reported phenomenon of commercial catalyst deactivation, sometimes quite rapid, from high activity of fresh samples to lower residual activity brought about by various factors, including the presence of poisons (sulphur, chlorine) and coke formation. [Pg.361]

In methanol conversion over molecular sieves having three-dimensional pore and cage structures, methyl benzene is recognized as a reactive intermediate that can enhance the reaction rate, and the bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons show very low activity in prompting methanol conversion. Actually, both the bicyclic and polycycHc aromatic hydrocarbons can be coke species during catalyst deactivation in MTO process over molecular sieves (Wei et al., 2012a). The formation of polycycHc aromatic... [Pg.305]

Finally, PILC, REY-PILC, and a commercial equilibrium catalyst were evaluated at near constant conversion using a heavier feed, hydrotreated resid. The product yields are shown in Table III. Steam deactivated (D), REY-PILC, produced the same gasoline selectivity, LCO/HCO ratio, and coke yield as calcined PILC. The equilibrium catalyst which represents a more severely deactivated (E) sample had higher gasoline selectivity, lower coke yield, and lower HCO/LCO ratio. The higher coke yield of REY-PILC could be due to occlusion of high molecular weight hydrocarbons in the microstructure of the pillared clay. [Pg.263]

Catalyst mass flowrates exceeding about 1600 Ib/ft -min (7800kg/m -min) results in poor steam/catalyst contacting, flooded trays, insufficient catalyst residence time, and increased steam entrainment to the spent catalyst standpipe. This is reflected by the stripper efficiency and catalyst density shown in Figure 7.10. The primary concern is hydrocarbon entrainment to the regenerator leading to loss of product, increased catalyst deactivation, increased delta coke and potential loss of conversion and total liquid yield, and feed rate limitation. A rapid decrease in stripper bed density is an indication that... [Pg.115]

Fig. 6 Schematic drawing of ZSM5 catalyst bed deactivation. View of the fused silica reaction tube at about 40 % of catalyst life time. Black zone (I) of deactivated catalyst particles covered with coke ("methanol coke"). Small dark reaction zone (II) in which methanol conversion to 100 % occurs. Blue/grey zone (III) of active catalyst on which a small amount of "olefin coke" produced by the olefinic hydrocarbon product mixture has been deposited on the crystallite surfaces. The quartz particles before and behind the catalyst bed (zones 0) remain essentially white. Fig. 6 Schematic drawing of ZSM5 catalyst bed deactivation. View of the fused silica reaction tube at about 40 % of catalyst life time. Black zone (I) of deactivated catalyst particles covered with coke ("methanol coke"). Small dark reaction zone (II) in which methanol conversion to 100 % occurs. Blue/grey zone (III) of active catalyst on which a small amount of "olefin coke" produced by the olefinic hydrocarbon product mixture has been deposited on the crystallite surfaces. The quartz particles before and behind the catalyst bed (zones 0) remain essentially white.

See other pages where Hydrocarbon conversion, deactivation coking is mentioned: [Pg.201]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.250]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 , Pg.92 , Pg.93 , Pg.94 , Pg.95 , Pg.96 ]




SEARCH



Conversion hydrocarbon

Hydrocarbon coking

Hydrocarbon conversion, deactivation

© 2024 chempedia.info